it's sexist!

[uniderth]

I don;t think there's anything wrong with it. We obviously don't liuve in a very tolerant society if we say a guy can oogle a girl or the women can't wear short skirts. Why is a woman staying and home and cooking and cleaning for her husband, a bad thing? Does every woman have to be a "Hillary-Clinton-pants-suit-executive-look-at-me-the-wrong-way-and-I-sue-you-for-sexual-harrasment?" That sort of attitude towards women seems very negative and lacking tolerance.

Besides there were uniforms for women that had pants. I always assumed they were for the Mormon crew members.

 

[Keith1701]

Heh, I actually thought of everything all of you said(60s era, fashion, feminity, women being on the bridge in the first place, etc.) as I was writing it. I posted it anyway because I knew it'd be an interesting discussion even though I had massive holes in my own argument.

It still irked me, though, all things considered.

There is nothing wrong with sexy in the 60's or now!!!!

 

[ROBE]

On the issue of pants or trousers women like Hillary Clinton always fail to realise one important thing. Trousers look fine on women for casual clothing, however for uniforms or suits they make them look like:
1) Charlie Chaplin
2) A butch lesbian
3) A butch lesbian Charlie Chaplin

Skirts look better with suits and uniforms, maybe it would be President Hillary Clinton now if she realised this.