Yeah, she never fired phasers or torpedoes at people!
Most every episode she orders her friends and crew to possibly murder and maim people and no one thinks to question those orders...
Okay now you're just making stuff up...
But in comparison ordering some one to kill seems less troublesome than ordering someone to save. As if it's more annoying to be alive than dead. I was more talking about how her crew reacts to these two starkly disparate orders than that Janeway was wrong in giving either of them and if her crew was "allowed" to conscientiously object.
Sisko is toying with a full glass of scotch.
SISKO
This morning, at oh-eight-hundred
hours, station time... the Romulan
Empire formally declared war
against the Dominion. They've
already struck fifteen bases along
the Cardassian border.
(beat)
So it's a huge victory for the
good guys... perhaps the turning
point of the entire war. There's
even a "Welcome to the Fight"
party in the wardroom tonight.
(beat)
I lied. I cheated. I bribed men
to cover up the crimes of other
men. I was an accessory to
murder. But most damning of
all... I think I can live with it.
SISKO (Cont'd)
And if I had to do it all over
again... I would. Garak was right
about one thing -- a guilty
conscience is a small price to pay
for the safety of the Alpha
Quadrant. So I'll learn to live
with it.
He almost takes a drink, then firmly sets it aside and
pushes it away.
SISKO
Because I can live with it.
He glares into the lens and we're not sure if he's
trying to convince us or himself.
SISKO
I can live with it.
Sisko stares into the camera for a long beat.
SISKO
Computer -- erase that entire
personal log.
It's not that Janeway made the wrong choice. it;s that there was no right chioce
and Janeway pretended that she had made the right choice or worse yet, she thought that she was wright and it was impossible for it to be otherwise.
wwwhhhhooooaaaa....Yeah, she never fired phasers or torpedoes at people!
No more or less than the other captains.
Why didn't they just store Tulix's personality in the holomatrix, as they did with that Vidian doctor The Doctor wined and dined?
I think the problem is with philosophy and not so much the writers...what is Janeways philosophy? in one hand there is the prime directive which to me reeks of deontology (thou shalt not interfere no matter what the consequence) but then often she chooses to save her friends in the name of utilitarianism (if I save my friend B'Elanna her skills in engineering will help all of us) The problem is that no philosophy is right. You can't deal in absolutes without having conflicts...The most ethical species would be the Borg because they never stray from thier morality.
As far as I'm concerened, none of the Star Trek captains are better than the other. Each had their strengths and weaknesses - Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway and Archer.
But Janeway receives the most criticism. In fact, Trek fans love bashing her character. But she is a woman and I understand. A female has no business being the lead in a science fiction show that features a cast portraying military personnel. At least I suspect that is how many of the fans feel.
I think the problem is with philosophy and not so much the writers...what is Janeways philosophy? in one hand there is the prime directive which to me reeks of deontology (thou shalt not interfere no matter what the consequence) but then often she chooses to save her friends in the name of utilitarianism (if I save my friend B'Elanna her skills in engineering will help all of us) The problem is that no philosophy is right. You can't deal in absolutes without having conflicts...The most ethical species would be the Borg because they never stray from thier morality.
I'm going to be insulting here. Chances are I'll be banned from this forum after I say this. The above statement, in my opinion, is the biggest piece of bullshit I have ever read about Janeway, hands down. And I have read a great deal of bullshit.
The only philosophy I have ever spotted by any of the Trek captains was their loyalty to Starfleet, the Federation and the so-called perfection of humanity. That's it. And I've noticed that they would resort to nearly anything to maintain this view.
As far as I'm concerened, none of the Star Trek captains are better than the other. Each had their strengths and weaknesses - Kirk, Picard, Sisko, Janeway and Archer.
But Janeway receives the most criticism. In fact, Trek fans love bashing her character. But she is a woman and I understand. A female has no business being the lead in a science fiction show that features a cast portraying military personnel. At least I suspect that is how many of the fans feel.
I'm going to be insulting here. Chances are I'll be banned from this forum after I say this. The above statement, in my opinion, is the biggest piece of bullshit I have ever read about Janeway, hands down. And I have read a great deal of bullshit.I think the problem is with philosophy and not so much the writers...what is Janeways philosophy? in one hand there is the prime directive which to me reeks of deontology (thou shalt not interfere no matter what the consequence) but then often she chooses to save her friends in the name of utilitarianism (if I save my friend B'Elanna her skills in engineering will help all of us) The problem is that no philosophy is right. You can't deal in absolutes without having conflicts...The most ethical species would be the Borg because they never stray from thier morality.
The only philosophy I have ever spotted by any of the Trek captains was their loyalty to Starfleet, the Federation and the so-called perfection of humanity. That's it. And I've noticed that they would resort to nearly anything to maintain this view.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.