Is There a feud in Star Trek XII?

[Trekkie2]

Didn't K in Men In Black say that the National Inquirer was one of the "hot sheets" for identifying alien life on this planet?

Seriously, the feud is between Pine and Quinto, and the
Spirk love thing is off now.

I did notice when Pegg was doing that video, he does appear to have a shiner. Maybe the Scotty/Keenser thing is off too.

 

[Balrog]

we can only pray we never ever ever hear from voyager again.

Come on, evil Janeway would be great.

That was Equinox PT. 2.

 

[Set Harth]

Seriously, the feud is between Pine and Quinto, and the
Spirk love thing is off now.

I did notice when Pegg was doing that video, he does appear to have a shiner. Maybe the Scotty/Keenser thing is off too.

That paves the way for Scotty/Spock and Kirk/Keenser.

 

[Sector 7]

I miss the Weekly World News. While I didn't buy it, the over the top cover stories were usually good for a laugh while I was waiting in line at the grocery checkout.

Those "My baby is an alien!" covers were always good for a real life LOL!!

I understand its Pegg and Keenser. Didn't you see the latest Pegg video?

Well, Deep Roy (who plays Keenser) is probably the greatest Kenyan-born-little-person-of-Indian-descent actor of all time, so I can totally understand him having a prima donna attitude.

Because of his Indian heritage, Deep Roy was cast as the new Khan. The rift is because Pine was laughing every time he should have been yelling, "Kha-a-a-n!!" Deep Roy hates being laughed at...

 

[Nerys Myk]

I'm reminded of a 'shop I did for a the STXI caption contest a few years back.

 

[M'Sharak]

Would the Vulcan-human baby look anything like Bat Boy?

 

[Nerys Myk]

Would the Vulcan-human baby look anything like Bat Boy?

As played by a young Clint Howard.

 

[Therin of Andor]

I did notice when Pegg was doing that video, he does appear to have a shiner. Maybe the Scotty/Keenser thing is off too.

How did Deep Roy reach his eye?

 

[M'Sharak]

I did notice when Pegg was doing that video, he does appear to have a shiner. Maybe the Scotty/Keenser thing is off too.

How did Deep Roy reach his eye?

Keenser was always climbing on top of stuff, right?

 

[Kanenas]

For everyone bashing The Enquirer, don't forget that they were 100% CORRECT about the John Edwards story. While everyone (including me) laughed, they actually did some good reporting and got it right. (funny they weren't mentioned at Pulitzer time for doing actual reporting).

The Enquirer may have beaten the others to the punch by being the first to identify Edwards by name on 10 October 2007, but the rumor had already been making the rounds for several weeks, at that point, and a lot of people were on the trail.

Besides, calling the National Enquirer a gossip-trash tabloid which routinely publishes wholly-invented stories as fact is neither bashing nor is it exaggeration. Such stories are their stock-in-trade, and it is that justly-earned reputation for dubious "news" which casts some doubt upon the veracity of a report that two (as yet-unnamed) actors have been feuding on the set of the Star Trek movie currently in production. I personally will be very surprised if there turns out to be any truth to the rumor.

<snip>

we can only pray we never ever ever hear from voyager again.

Show me on this doll where the bad Voyager touched you.

Seriously: if a show isn't to your liking, just stop watching; it really is that simple. If you're still trawling around internet forums not even dedicated to that series and posting drive-by swipes about it more than ten years after the show's cancellation, I don't know what else to say to you but "Don't do that here - you're in the wrong damn forum."

You are correct, I did stop watching voyager after giving it a chance because it was under the star trek franchise. The consensus outside of this form supports the "weakest link" in the franchise principle.

that said. I am curious as to whether there is a real fued on the set or this is another PR stunt. Actors and Actresses show up, read their lines, go home, editors edit, special effects fix and presto instant popcorn seller. (and if someone pisses Abrams off then they get replaced unceremoniously)

 

[M'Sharak]

...

that said. I am curious as to whether there is a real fued on the set or this is another PR stunt. Actors and Actresses show up, read their lines, go home, editors edit, special effects fix and presto instant popcorn seller. (and if someone pisses Abrams off then they get replaced unceremoniously)

Personally, I'm inclined to doubt that there's anything to this supposed feud which rises even to the level of "stunt". My bet, at this point, would be on the whole thing being no more than the invention of an Enquirer staff writer. (If I were one to bet on such things, anyway.)

 

[Tom]

That's a good question. If anything, these people are even less important than the VOYAGER and ENTERPRISE actors.

Of course, I don't follow new shows unless something interesting comes to DVD, so, what do I know?

Have any of the Enterprise or Voyager actor been the leads in major film releases?

Not that I'm aware of. I just meant that I'm more familiar with them that I am the cast of XI, outside of their Star Trek work. But, who knows? Maybe that'll change.

Scott Bakula has had the lead in quite a few movies in his almost 30 year career. While most I would not consider major, films like Necessary Roughness did pretty well when they came out.

 

[TimeTraveler]

According to Alex Kurtzman, the Enterprise crew still isn't cozy with each other in the next film.

http://www.fansshare.com/news/alex-kurtzman-teases-star-trek-2-plot/

 

[shapeshifter]

Finally, another bone is tossed our way.

 

[Eno]

Never believe holywood stories. Just look at the manipulation so far...this thread is evidence of it. Everyone is discussing the new film.

 

[Ssosmcin]

As for the Enquirer's veracity, I do remember reading an article in 1989 spilling the beans about the "plot of Star Trek V." It detailed plot spoilers and scenes that sounded so unrealistic and over the top that I laughed heartily when I read it. Weeks later, I sat in horror as each scene described in the article unspooled before me. The report was 100% accurate.

So, you never know…

 

[Balrog]

^ Yeah, but that was a spoiler about the movie. Who gives a crap if the nucrew gets along or not. They are actors getting paid a good amount of dough to do a job. I don't care if they hang out go fishing drink beers be buddy-buddy chums about it.

It's exactly like the whole Shatner thing. So he was supposedly a tool at work. He did his job, though. Kirk is still one of my favorite childhood characters. And he got called out on it by his castmates. Fine. But you know what? That they still bitch and bitch and bitch about it after all these years, it's just whining now. It's a just a job. Get over it (I mean the actors should get over it and not anyone here, of course ).

 

[Therin of Andor]

It's exactly like the whole Shatner thing. So he was supposedly a tool at work. He did his job, though.

He also supposedly deliberately ruined guest actors' takes so the one the editor had to end up using was his closeup. That's not "doing his job".

That they still bitch and bitch and bitch about it after all these years, it's just whining now. It's a just a job. Get over it (I mean the actors should get over it and not anyone here, of course ).

A reporter, or a convention attendee, asks them: "What was Shatner like to work with?"

Do you want them to (a) lie, (b) tell the truth, or (c) say "No comment"? Any of those choices will sound negative to someone.