I dunno, Time doesn't usually report on gossip...
Is There a feud in Star Trek XII?
- Thread starter ralph
- Start date
I dunno, Time doesn't usually report on gossip...
So, allegedly two actors are at each other's throats, but there's nothing indicating which two?
Sweet fuck, does no one want to say anything about this movie? Or is Abrams so draconian that he thinks revealing which two actors don't get along will ruin the plot and cost him a minimum of $060,000 at the box office?
Whoever it is must be wearing a black t-shirt...
Sweet fuck, does no one want to say anything about this movie? Or is Abrams so draconian that he thinks revealing which two actors don't get along will ruin the plot and cost him a minimum of $060,000 at the box office?
Whoever it is must be wearing a black t-shirt...
The only reason this is being discussed here is because there is nothing else to talk about 
Count yourself as lucky.
Yes I also am forbidden from seeing this wonderful news source.
Don't feel too deprived, either of you. The National Enquirer is one of the oldest continuously-published gossip-trash tabloids in the U.S. (and not at all above inventing stories out of whole cloth in order to fill column space) but it's never ever fooled anyone into believing that it was an example of either good writing or good journalism.
Here's the pertinent bit, quoted:
National Enquirer said:
Their covers were way better than anything the Enquirer had to offer. The WWW is still an online presence, but it isn't quite the same as laughing out loud in the checkout line.
Well, to be fair, they were the ones that uncovered the John Edwards affair, effectively ruining his career. But the fact that they were the ones that revealed the scandal was itself a news story, too. The Pulitzer Prize Board even said the Enquirer was eligible for consideration (though obviously it didn't nab a nomination). In all, the John Edwards affair paradoxically only highlighted tabloid's reputation as a trashy gossip rag.
For everyone bashing The Enquirer, don't forget that they were 100% CORRECT about the John Edwards story. While everyone (including me) laughed, they actually did some good reporting and got it right. (funny they weren't mentioned at Pulitzer time for doing actual reporting).
Wander into any Australian newspaper outlet. This is the paper that often features a headline such as "I had an alien's baby!"
I don't exist outside of the internet so this isn't possible for me.
The Enquirer may have beaten the others to the punch by being the first to identify Edwards by name on 10 October 2007, but the rumor had already been making the rounds for several weeks, at that point, and a lot of people were on the trail.
Besides, calling the National Enquirer a gossip-trash tabloid which routinely publishes wholly-invented stories as fact is neither bashing nor is it exaggeration. Such stories are their stock-in-trade, and it is that justly-earned reputation for dubious "news" which casts some doubt upon the veracity of a report that two (as yet-unnamed) actors have been feuding on the set of the Star Trek movie currently in production. I personally will be very surprised if there turns out to be any truth to the rumor.
Show me on this doll where the bad Voyager touched you.
Seriously: if a show isn't to your liking, just stop watching; it really is that simple. If you're still trawling around internet forums not even dedicated to that series and posting drive-by swipes about it more than ten years after the show's cancellation, I don't know what else to say to you but "Don't do that here - you're in the wrong damn forum."
Well, Deep Roy (who plays Keenser) is probably the greatest Kenyan-born-little-person-of-Indian-descent actor of all time, so I can totally understand him having a prima donna attitude.
Last edited:
Similar threads
