• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is Nu-Who Really a "Kelvin" Timeline?

back on topic..

I think the Classic era Had what we could tell, no real BIG universal changes, where timelines were concerned. Some small pockets of things happening, but for the most part, and probably because the Time Lords kept all that in check, up to the 1996 movie, excluding comics and novella, The Classic era was for the most part stable in terms of time line. The Castrovalva Incident was entropy taking out a significant portion of the known universe, while other then that, the time line of all the events we could tell were in tact.

With STAR TREK the Kelvin reboot, the universe was changed by one Seminole event, leading to a new time line where things were similar to the original, yet different. I am not saying it's proof, however one could make an argument that the Changes to the universe via the time war, made a Kelvin timeline that the new series picked up with, and that would explain a lot of differences in the Doctor's TARDIS ala The Christmas special showing the David Bradley TARDIS being much different to the original Hartnell version. The Tenth planet console room looked a lot different and did not include the hexagon roundels like the Curator's under-gallery.

So I can compile a lot of differences which could make a case for a Kelvin timeline, but then again, This is a thread about why it could, why it can't it doesn't matter, if this is prime timeline, the changes can be blamed on the time war, and yet making this Nu-Who a Kelvin universe can also work, and too can be blamed on the time war.

The implication of which, either way probably ends up with the same result. But then again, that does leave open a universe somewhere out there, were the time war never happened, and the classic universe kept going according to pattern.. I wonder if the Doctor ended at his final regeneration and without a War Doctor, and so on, the Classic Doctor probably would have regenerated into very different people.

All the same, the most nagging thing in my mind from NuWho is the Curator.. Even the back of the toy package has the quote about wearing old faces, but just the favourites, but then again if they were ever to take the series back to a familiar face and it be a recast of Tom Baker (like a David Bradley) who the heck could pull off a successful Young Tom Baker?? I am stumped here.. I can't see anyone who has that type of cadence and drawl in their speech to pull off his subtle pauses and quick whit comments. IS there a British Actor out there that could possibly pull that off??? Who knows. But if NuWho is now a Kelvin time line, that would explain Clara being involved all the way back to the 1st Doctor, which never really happened in the classic time line. If the new timeline rewrites classic Whovian history, is that not then creating a new time line and universe? I am perplexed by canonicity terms of those who say the new show is canon, and yet if you know about how time is supposed to work, then there should have been multiple new time lines since the 1996 movie that have happened since the time war. Clara, and so on... in NuWho. It's like a paradox.. Both could be true, like a quantum particle, but only one choice leads to a solidified path. So I put it like this for the sake of pondering the thread question. Had the Time War not occurred would the Whovian universe be the same as the classic, or could they have moved into the new series with a successful continuation? The Time War was a great plot, don't get me wrong. It made for a fascinating story to follow, last of the time lords, the death of Gallifrey and the Daleks being all but wiped from existence.

I just like to hypothesize on things like this as an amusing idea.. If NuWho is a Kelvin timeline then what did the prime time line continue as? Did the Doctor kick off after 12? Who would inherit the Doctor's Type 40? Would the show go on without the Doctor? Or would they have given him more Regens again, but happen differently? Would they have brought back the Rani? ( miss her) and what would The Imperial Daleks look like? Would the Daleks still be in a Civil War like the Sontarans and Rutans eternal struggle? Who knows.. I know one thing.. I would love to see the New series give us a classic and yet (facially Updated) Black and silver suited Sontaran. I Also preferred the 80s Cybermen the best.. love to see them back. As freaky as the 10th Planet version was as Bill, I would prefer them give us a slightly updated and full human body with augmented strength and hands 80s Cybers.. I like them more so then the super robots with brain of a human ver. Seems too robotic and not enough Cyber-humanoid. when you think of Cyber-Men it almost implies actual bodies, just cyber enhanced, not a robot-human head cyber combo. I always thought that the 80s Cybermen were allot more freaky because of that. Especially that clear mouth piece where you could see the human mouth moving under the helmet.
 
It's a time travel show, things get changed and rewritten all the time. But from the Doctor's personal timeline, the only one that matters, it's all been the same one. He just remembers the original version, not that it even matters. Getting obsessed with the timelines of Doctor Who is a fruitless endeavor since it's going to be changed by something later, the only thing that won't is the Doctor since he, now she, is the only character we've been with all the way through.
 
It's a time travel show, things get changed and rewritten all the time. But from the Doctor's personal timeline, the only one that matters, it's all been the same one. He just remembers the original version, not that it even matters. Getting obsessed with the timelines of Doctor Who is a fruitless endeavor since it's going to be changed by something later, the only thing that won't is the Doctor since he, now she, is the only character we've been with all the way through.

This, trying to make Doctor Who all add together is a recipe for making your head explode, lol
 
back on topic..

I think the Classic era Had what we could tell, no real BIG universal changes, where timelines were concerned. Some small pockets of things happening, but for the most part, and probably because the Time Lords kept all that in check, up to the 1996 movie, excluding comics and novella, The Classic era was for the most part stable in terms of time line. The Castrovalva Incident was entropy taking out a significant portion of the known universe, while other then that, the time line of all the events we could tell were in tact.

With STAR TREK the Kelvin reboot, the universe was changed by one Seminole event, leading to a new time line where things were similar to the original, yet different. I am not saying it's proof, however one could make an argument that the Changes to the universe via the time war, made a Kelvin timeline that the new series picked up with, and that would explain a lot of differences in the Doctor's TARDIS ala The Christmas special showing the David Bradley TARDIS being much different to the original Hartnell version. The Tenth planet console room looked a lot different and did not include the hexagon roundels like the Curator's under-gallery.

So I can compile a lot of differences which could make a case for a Kelvin timeline, but then again, This is a thread about why it could, why it can't it doesn't matter, if this is prime timeline, the changes can be blamed on the time war, and yet making this Nu-Who a Kelvin universe can also work, and too can be blamed on the time war.

The implication of which, either way probably ends up with the same result. But then again, that does leave open a universe somewhere out there, were the time war never happened, and the classic universe kept going according to pattern.. I wonder if the Doctor ended at his final regeneration and without a War Doctor, and so on, the Classic Doctor probably would have regenerated into very different people.

All the same, the most nagging thing in my mind from NuWho is the Curator.. Even the back of the toy package has the quote about wearing old faces, but just the favourites, but then again if they were ever to take the series back to a familiar face and it be a recast of Tom Baker (like a David Bradley) who the heck could pull off a successful Young Tom Baker?? I am stumped here.. I can't see anyone who has that type of cadence and drawl in their speech to pull off his subtle pauses and quick whit comments. IS there a British Actor out there that could possibly pull that off??? Who knows. But if NuWho is now a Kelvin time line, that would explain Clara being involved all the way back to the 1st Doctor, which never really happened in the classic time line. If the new timeline rewrites classic Whovian history, is that not then creating a new time line and universe? I am perplexed by canonicity terms of those who say the new show is canon, and yet if you know about how time is supposed to work, then there should have been multiple new time lines since the 1996 movie that have happened since the time war. Clara, and so on... in NuWho. It's like a paradox.. Both could be true, like a quantum particle, but only one choice leads to a solidified path. So I put it like this for the sake of pondering the thread question. Had the Time War not occurred would the Whovian universe be the same as the classic, or could they have moved into the new series with a successful continuation? The Time War was a great plot, don't get me wrong. It made for a fascinating story to follow, last of the time lords, the death of Gallifrey and the Daleks being all but wiped from existence.

I just like to hypothesize on things like this as an amusing idea.. If NuWho is a Kelvin timeline then what did the prime time line continue as? Did the Doctor kick off after 12? Who would inherit the Doctor's Type 40? Would the show go on without the Doctor? Or would they have given him more Regens again, but happen differently? Would they have brought back the Rani? ( miss her) and what would The Imperial Daleks look like? Would the Daleks still be in a Civil War like the Sontarans and Rutans eternal struggle? Who knows.. I know one thing.. I would love to see the New series give us a classic and yet (facially Updated) Black and silver suited Sontaran. I Also preferred the 80s Cybermen the best.. love to see them back. As freaky as the 10th Planet version was as Bill, I would prefer them give us a slightly updated and full human body with augmented strength and hands 80s Cybers.. I like them more so then the super robots with brain of a human ver. Seems too robotic and not enough Cyber-humanoid. when you think of Cyber-Men it almost implies actual bodies, just cyber enhanced, not a robot-human head cyber combo. I always thought that the 80s Cybermen were allot more freaky because of that. Especially that clear mouth piece where you could see the human mouth moving under the helmet.
Dude, it's just an old TV show and no-one gave a fig about consistency back in those days. The BBC didn't even think it was worth preserving the video tapes for posterity. Why don't you direct your enormous intellect - apparently, you're one of the five smartest people on the Earth - to solving real-world problems instead of wasting your time around here?
 
Dude, it's just an old TV show and no-one gave a fig about consistency back in those days. The BBC didn't even think it was worth preserving the video tapes for posterity. Why don't you direct your enormous intellect - apparently, you're one of the five smartest people on the Earth - to solving real-world problems instead of wasting your time around here?
LMAO!
Simple..
Choice..
There's more to enjoy in life then working on problems that others are already working on. I myself have a few patents I AM interested in getting done. I would love to pick up, when I have funding, where Tesla left off on his free wireless energy machine. Sadly, I think the Big Government and Big Oil would shut it down. As they did with Tesla almost a century ago. His work stolen and missing. Free energy would change the world, but put a lot of wealthy families that have a strangle hold on public Policy and geo-political associations out of business.

Tesla was brilliant and died penny less. who wants that..not I.

Besides there are more then 5 people in the world who are smarter then I. Not all high IQ people end up in Mensa, or are lucky or wealthy enough to be properly educated, in some cases, families don't know what they see. They don't recognize their child has a smart mind, and so I believe there are many many smart people out there who have maybe been misdiagnosed with ADD, or ADHD, and Asbergers, or Autism, and are drugged up as a result. Good Will Hunting was a great movie that shone light on this subject in a somewhat limited way. I urge you tho to check out the book the Curse of the High IQ by Aaron Clarey for more in-depth analysis. If society were better able to reach these smart kids and recognize them, test them, instead of misdiognosing them and drugging them up, the world may be a better place for us all.

What I find funny is most people assume a Genius is a Math whiz, while for the most part an aptitude in that is common, it doesn't mean every genius likes Maths, or even any of the sciences. Some geniuses are only interested in wealth creation. Some get lucky like Mark Zuckerberg.. Elon Musk, I wouldn't call a genius, as so much as a manager of Geniuses.

As for Doctor Who, my draw to the genre is purely technological and in pondering the implications of time travel and if there's any inspirational physics there that I could ponder in a real world sense. Most of the show is no where near science, but in science fiction, should there be a leap in technological know how, then maybe some of the concepts there would become a reality, similar to how Star Trek inspired many devices we have today.

Doctor Who shares this same inspirational imaginary universe, which may some day lead to great advancements in technology based on what some future genius sees in the show. As far as coming up with something to help the world, I have a few patents I want to get in place, mainly as a means of wealth accumulation.

After which I have a design I want to put into brick and mortar, a building that is also a machine. It's gonna take a lot of money to make it reality, as the building would be capable of harmonizing with the Earth's natural resonance vibration. A home of sorts and lab that I want to build in the West of the US and in a mountainous area.

However, I may have taken your comments off on a tangent and you may be implying I leave here all together because I have a view that differs from standard ideological crowd psychology. To that, I say no.. Sorry I am also a fan, why should I have to be silenced simply because I don't think there's a good reason for the new series focus on Millennial Identity Politics. Bottom line, If they just tell great stories, Jodie will do fine (her acting such as it is).

Is it me, or is US treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin a dead ringer for Gary Schandling...LMAO! He even talks like Gary, rest in peace Mr. Schandling, your comedy was well recieved.
 
Last edited:
It's a time travel show, things get changed and rewritten all the time. But from the Doctor's personal timeline, the only one that matters, it's all been the same one. He just remembers the original version, not that it even matters. Getting obsessed with the timelines of Doctor Who is a fruitless endeavor since it's going to be changed by something later, the only thing that won't is the Doctor since he, now she, is the only character we've been with all the way through.

Ah, I see what your saying. The universe around the Doctor can change a billion times over, and yet as the audience we see the Doctor remain the same person, so we see the changes but it's not a Kelvin timeline because the central figure we follow doesn't change and his past is still canon, even with future changes to his past, it's the same canon. I get that. I'm not hung up on continuity per se' rather, I just think it's fun to contemplate the implications of canonicity in the terms of NuWho vs Classic.
 
LMAO!
Simple..
Choice..
There's more to enjoy in life then working on problems that others are already working on. I myself have a few patents I AM interested in getting done. I would love to pick up, when I have funding, where Tesla left off on his free wireless energy machine. Sadly, I think the Big Government and Big Oil would shut it down. As they did with Tesla almost a century ago. His work stolen and missing. Free energy would change the world, but put a lot of wealthy families that have a strangle hold on public Policy and geo-political associations out of business.

Tesla was brilliant and died penny less. who wants that..not I.

Besides there are more then 5 people in the world who are smarter then I. Not all high IQ people end up in Mensa, or are lucky or wealthy enough to be properly educated, in some cases, families don't know what they see. They don't recognize their child has a smart mind, and so I believe there are many many smart people out there who have maybe been misdiagnosed with ADD, or ADHD, and Asbergers, or Autism, and are drugged up as a result. Good Will Hunting was a great movie that shone light on this subject in a somewhat limited way. I urge you tho to check out the book the Curse of the High IQ by Aaron Clarey for more in-depth analysis. If society were better able to reach these smart kids and recognize them, test them, instead of misdiognosing them and drugging them up, the world may be a better place for us all.

What I find funny is most people assume a Genius is a Math whiz, while for the most part an aptitude in that is common, it doesn't mean every genius likes Maths, or even any of the sciences. Some geniuses are only interested in wealth creation. Some get lucky like Mark Zuckerberg.. Elon Musk, I wouldn't call a genius, as so much as a manager of Geniuses.

As for Doctor Who, my draw to the genre is purely technological and in pondering the implications of time travel and if there's any inspirational physics there that I could ponder in a real world sense. Most of the show is no where near science, but in science fiction, should there be a leap in technological know how, then maybe some of the concepts there would become a reality, similar to how Star Trek inspired many devices we have today.

Doctor Who shares this same inspirational imaginary universe, which may some day lead to great advancements in technology based on what some future genius sees in the show. As far as coming up with something to help the world, I have a few patents I want to get in place, mainly as a means of wealth accumulation.

After which I have a design I want to put into brick and mortar, a building that is also a machine. It's gonna take a lot of money to make it reality, as the building would be capable of harmonizing with the Earth's natural resonance vibration. A home of sorts and lab that I want to build in the West of the US and in a mountainous area.

However, I may have taken your comments off on a tangent and you may be implying I leave here all together because I have a view that differs from standard ideological crowd psychology. To that, I say no.. Sorry I am also a fan, why should I have to be silenced simply because I don't think there's a good reason for the new series focus on Millennial Identity Politics. Bottom line, If they just tell great stories, Jodie will do fine (her acting such as it is).

Is it me, or is US treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin a dead ringer for Gary Schandling...LMAO! He even talks like Gary, rest in peace Mr. Schandling, your comedy was well recieved.
Tesla certainly wasn't a genius when it came to economics - he would have been distributing energy for free without any means of measuring usage - that would run afoul of the capitalist system besides running the operator into bankruptcy.
 
Remember you should use correct pronouns, you should be saying "she" and "her" for the Doctor and not "him" or "his". She may have been a male in her past, but right now she's a woman and is still the same person, so all those old Doctors are really still her, and it's inappropriate, just a reminder. :)

Reading so many messages in here and also how you derailed your own thread so quickly and so violently, my strong feeling is this whole concept is a thinly veiled attempt to delegitimize our new Doctor and say she isn't really the Doctor, which is really rather vile. I don't know enough of course about how time travel mechanics work or anything, but I've read a lot of peoples' posts and it really seems not much difference is really made.

So if you're wanting to say there are two Doctors, because of some sort of parallel universe split or something, I feel we should clear up now that even in your "original" timeline, the Doctor's current incarnation is still a woman? I feel if we can just settle that it'd be so much easier to entertain your idea without a sinister ulterior motive?

Please do remember whenever talking about the Doctor to use her correct pronouns! Even when talking about her previous incarnations, her present being is female, so like even when you're talking about the first Doctor you should be saying like "When she was played by X actor (I don't know his name, lol), she did such and such and her personality was like so", etc, you know what I mean? Thank you kindly!
 
I've been going back and forth on this subject for awhile now. IT'S BEEN NAGGING my subconscious ever since the reboot of the show occurred. I could say that I could rationalize the differences of the Nu series and blame it all on the Time War.. Retcon of events, and future events compounding past classic series canon, Clara, and The difference with the Daleks, Clara, and Clara (rolls eyes), and so on.. By rationalizing the time war as the culprit, I can remain calm..safe.. comfortable in knowing the universe is just kooky because of those crazy Gallifreyans.. But when you really start to think about it, the idea of the Nu-Who series being actually set in an alternative reality, or a "Kelvin" like continuity, the inconsistencies become apparent. The main factor, the clincher for me is the latest Christmas special..

NuWho is not a Kelvin timeline---its just a franchise that plays fast and loose with history and whatever serves the stories at any moment. For example, so-called "classic Who" have episodes where the Davison era referred to events from the Pertwee or Baker runs, but it was arguably as loose as the Davros/Sarah Jane scene in "Journey's End"---a reference/nod to old the original series. In other words, it all comes off like fan service when the entire franchise has never handed down a strict set of rules about the integrity of one series to another. That applies to the Doctor's beliefs, as we have witnessed the Doctor willing to "take it to" adversaries with a generally more world-weary, experienced, arguably darker personality (Pertwee and Eccleston immediately come to mind), while others tripped over themselves to avoid direct conflict and/or act aggressively, even though they are all supposed to be--at the heart of it all--the same person.

Know what? I'm beyond pissed...
I challenge you to personal combat for your words....
Name a time and place to lose your legs...
I'll be there...

And I'm not kidding,,,,I have financial resources to meet you when and where...
This old man will teach you RESPECT

Surprise Me....
(And no, I'm as much of Ship as you are...that's the lesson. Did
Yaisuah die for nothing?)

Threatening someone (you do not know) with violence.... certainly not acceptable as an honest statement and not as a "joke" either.
 
Remember you should use correct pronouns, you should be saying "she" and "her" for the Doctor and not "him" or "his". She may have been a male in her past, but right now she's a woman and is still the same person, so all those old Doctors are really still her, and it's inappropriate, just a reminder. :)

Reading so many messages in here and also how you derailed your own thread so quickly and so violently, my strong feeling is this whole concept is a thinly veiled attempt to delegitimize our new Doctor and say she isn't really the Doctor, which is really rather vile. I don't know enough of course about how time travel mechanics work or anything, but I've read a lot of peoples' posts and it really seems not much difference is really made.

So if you're wanting to say there are two Doctors, because of some sort of parallel universe split or something, I feel we should clear up now that even in your "original" timeline, the Doctor's current incarnation is still a woman? I feel if we can just settle that it'd be so much easier to entertain your idea without a sinister ulterior motive?

Please do remember whenever talking about the Doctor to use her correct pronouns! Even when talking about her previous incarnations, her present being is female, so like even when you're talking about the first Doctor you should be saying like "When she was played by X actor (I don't know his name, lol), she did such and such and her personality was like so", etc, you know what I mean? Thank you kindly!
The show has been extremely clear that the Doctor who is on the show is the same Doctor who first appeared in 1963. Trying to pretend otherwise is just ignoring what's been presented on screen. And yeah, the Doctor is a she now. Based on other Time Lords, they all seem to be gender fluid so they immediately identify as their current gender without any unease or difficulty.
DOCTOR: She was my first friend, always so brilliant, from the first day at the Academy. So fast, so funny. She was my man crush.

BILL: I'm sorry?

DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly sure that I was, too. It was a long time ago, though.

BILL: So, the Time Lords, bit flexible on the whole man-woman thing, then, yeah?

DOCTOR: We're the most civilised civilisation in the universe. We're billions of years beyond your petty human obsession with gender and its associated stereotypes.

BILL: But you still call yourselves Time Lords?

DOCTOR: Yeah. Shut up.

GASTRON: Med team to sector fifty two, extraction chamber seven. Regeneration in progress.

(The regeneration ends, and where a white man had fallen, a black woman gets up.)

GASTRON: Are you all right, sir? Oh, er, sorry, ma'am.

GENERAL: Oh, back to normal, am I? The only time I've been a man, that last body. Dear Lord, how do you cope with all that ego?

So the Doctor is a she now, so it's best we all accept that and go with it. I personally think she's going to be great.
 
The show has been extremely clear that the Doctor who is on the show is the same Doctor who first appeared in 1963. Trying to pretend otherwise is just ignoring what's been presented on screen. And yeah, the Doctor is a she now. Based on other Time Lords, they all seem to be gender fluid so they immediately identify as their current gender without any unease or difficulty.




So the Doctor is a she now, so it's best we all accept that and go with it. I personally think she's going to be great.

Such a simple concept that seems to cause such difficulty for so many
 
DOCTOR: Yeah, I think she was a man back then. I'm fairly sure that I was, too. It was a long time ago, though.
I feel your line here is so very, very interesting. If she's only "fairly sure" she was a man then, she's not 100% sure, which to me says she's been a woman before because she can't remember absolutely certainly if she was a man or not at a certain time, if I'm thinking this through right?

Thank you so very kindly for posting those quotes, I found them very interesting and insightful in helping me understand some background before really getting into it.
 
Such a simple concept that seems to cause such difficulty for so many
I find it an extremely simple concept to grasp, I guess it's just too much for certain minds.

I feel your line here is so very, very interesting. If she's only "fairly sure" she was a man then, she's not 100% sure, which to me says she's been a woman before because she can't remember absolutely certainly if she was a man or not at a certain time, if I'm thinking this through right?

Thank you so very kindly for posting those quotes, I found them very interesting and insightful in helping me understand some background before really getting into it.
It's been hinted that the Doctor regenerated before the First Doctor. Although since he seemed to act like his regeneration into the second was his first, I guess it's possible that as children they shift around a bit and that it doesn't really count as a regeneration. Sort of like how Romana went through different forms before settling on her second form. Like they gain the ability to regenerate and it causes temporary regenerations for a brief period before going back to the form they were born as. That would explain the Doctor's confusion over her gender as a child. Time Lord puberty is probably awkward on levels most humans can't imagine.
 
That would explain the Doctor's confusion over her gender as a child. Time Lord puberty is probably awkward on levels most humans can't imagine.
That’s an intriguing and plausible theory. For me though, I heard 12 saying 1) he’s so old that he might not remember, and 2) it really doesn’t matter now.
 
I disagree about the pronoun thing. The Doctor was a 'he' when he was a he and is a 'she' now. Context.
 
I am sure you believe all this is an injustice. Judging by your little Sinclair Blurb signature there, a raging leftist is probably what some might call one such as you. I'm not saying you are, just making the observation, someone could get that impression by this post, and I am sure you have more then enough drones who agree with this stance. I however just have one point to make on this post..

so in the post you cite all these studies and such on representation.. and how there is inequality, and yet when a female lead is chosen, the notion that this is somehow "justice" for a precieved inadequate parity is also presented. What is funny is how it is stated that if a female lead or any other lead then a white male is chosen, then using the stats and so on you feel justified in this belief. I think what perplexes me is the ignorance of historical context, and the idea that it shouldn't matter who is chosen, except when it's a white male, then it's somehow bad.. In any other way casting is done, it is considered good.. regardless of the person's talent or ability.

Parity is great, and surely needed in some instances, but to force it and to the detriment of the talented and capabale then you are really saying it doesn't matter a person's skill, or ability. We only want a certain race, color, or gender, or political POV. that seems very much like racism does it not?? Justifications for it aside.. because they don't matter.

on the fundamental level what you advocate for is IMHO wrong. We should look at all people in terms of their capability and not their gender, race, orientation, and political leanings. Flipping that is what has led to historical acts of violence and scape goating a particular group, Like the Democratic Party did in the 60s-70s against Black People and inventing the KKK to keep them from voting. I would think someone with the time to research and provide all those stats would also know the difference and thru the lense of history see the folly of such ideology. IN FACT I would say that the modern flipping of making gender and race first as well as orientation, can still lead to violence against one group in particular, which you eloquently mock with your funny little white male pic. Nice to see that there's still an unprotected class of citizen out there, and you enjoy making light of the circumstance because you use history to say it should matter. As if there's a justification to take from one group and give to another, which is just creating another group with a grievance, and the cycle continues. What's funny is how history and stats can be twisted to be used to somehow solidify someone's position as true and accurate. Again, I say that your numbers don't take into account anything other then representation. It does not take into account industry trends, demographics in the trends, and political or bias reasoning that can come with casting. I take what you have placed here, with your nice little pie chart too, with a grain of salt.

I urge anyone who is curious to do their own research, and see if there are other underlying factors that would support or not support this supposition. I don't take anything for face value anymore, and really in my opinion, no body should.
You make some excellent points here :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top