• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is it time to put Star Trek to rest?

I can’t accept it’s anything but, but they are just so coy about it. SNW bears every single hallmark of being a reboot… but we are told otherwise so apparently that’s us told.

I watch SNW as a reboot in my mind and it doesn’t lessen it. It enriches it.
You lose the baggage as well. That baggage isn't always good for the types of stories they want to tell, in my opinion.
 
That’s just it though. We didn’t have to imagine because they made it explicit, repeatedly, that TOS did look like that in TNG, then DS9, then ENT. It was honored, lampshaded and celebrated as looking like it did.

Now we are told it didn’t look like that actually and… well, here we are.
Looks like. Surface level stuff. The two stories cannot plausibly co-exist if the classic Enterprise went to the edge of the galaxy twice and the centre of the galaxy twice, when that's half of Voyager's 75 year journey. But because they crossed over, you accept it blindly.
It wasn't like they were asking us to believe the two were taking place at the same time. They were a hundred years apart.
But content-wise, they don't make any sense. discovery at least classified the spore drive at the end of season two:lol:
 
Looks like. Surface level stuff. The two stories cannot plausibly co-exist if the classic Enterprise went to the edge of the galaxy twice and the centre of the galaxy twice, when that's half of Voyager's 75 year journey. But because they crossed over, you accept it blindly.

Because they accept each both exist independent of each other, partially due to the gap of time between the two.

If I'm thinking about TOS while watching Voyager, then the writers of Voyager are doing it wrong. That boils down my biggest issue with what CBS does, I spend more time thinking about past Trek when watching new Trek.
 
Looks like. Surface level stuff. The two stories cannot plausibly co-exist if the classic Enterprise went to the edge of the galaxy twice and the centre of the galaxy twice, when that's half of Voyager's 75 year journey. But because they crossed over, you accept it blindly.

I think ‘accept blindly’ is a double edged sword here personally. There’s plenty accepting blindly what CBS says is right, even when it runs contrary to what they are actually putting onscreen.
 
Garak: "My dear doctor, they're all Prime."
Bashir: "Even the Kelvin timeline?"
Garak: "Especially the Kel..."



No... no, I just can't. Even I can't make this joke with a straight face.
Great things that the Kelvin films gave to the Prime universe.
DBz60Di.jpeg
 
Looks like. Surface level stuff. The two stories cannot plausibly co-exist if the classic Enterprise went to the edge of the galaxy twice and the centre of the galaxy twice, when that's half of Voyager's 75 year journey. But because they crossed over, you accept it blindly.

But content-wise, they don't make any sense. discovery at least classified the spore drive at the end of season two:lol:
Isn't that just "speed of plot"? There are bound to be stories from TNG that couldn't possibly exist with other TNG episodes if travel speed had to remain precise.

(Just remembered how the Enterprise-E got from the Romulan Neutral Zone, to Earth, in time for the same battle they just heard on the wireless)
 
Last edited:
Indeed, yes. I think "blind acceptance" is something needing careful consideration as a phrase. Each person takes Trek by their own measure, just like other art. One person I heard about acted out Shakespeare with their GI Joe action figures.

To me, TOS is entire incompatible with later Trek. It goes faster, things are way more unknown, and rarely do any of the discoveries in TOS matter down the road. So, why connect to TMP, going forward.

So, I take continuity with a grain of salt or twelve. Because Trek only felt like one big happy fleet between TNG-VOY-DS9, and somewhat with the TOS films.
 
Looks like. Surface level stuff. The two stories cannot plausibly co-exist if the classic Enterprise went to the edge of the galaxy twice and the centre of the galaxy twice, when that's half of Voyager's 75 year journey. But because they crossed over, you accept it blindly.

But content-wise, they don't make any sense. discovery at least classified the spore drive at the end of season two:lol:

One of those stories also had a 78 deck tall Enterprise. And I love TAS but The Magicks of Megas-tu is not the most scientifically rigorous of stories. But it might be more than Star Trek V.

Isn't that just "speed of plot"? There are bound to be stories from TNG that couldn't possibly exist with other TNG episodes if travel speed had to remain precise.

If you think you can "fall into the sun" for a Goldilocks' planet orbit in a single 15 minute act of a show, you can probably be forgiven for thinking you can get around the galaxy pretty quick.
 
I never understood the Robau thing. He’s just a random bald guy who dies in 5 minutes.

Which I suppose is the point of the joke?

Maybe you had to be there.
Some other captains/commodores we’ve seen for five or so minutes:

Styles
Harriman
Stocker
A bunch of vaguely remembered ones in BermanTrek.

Robau seems rather more impressive. Cuz he’s a badass. 😉

(But, to be fair, while I enjoy the memes, I can see where their appeal is not universal).
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top