• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Is (guess who) a (insert something) Sue? (Spoilers)

Is Yoda a Baby Sue?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Of course not, there's a perfectly established canon precedent

  • Well, isn't this a turn around?


Results are only viewable after voting.
In my mind Luke touched the Force in that moment, let it take the shot.. put his faith in it. For that brief moment the Force guided him. Didn't mean he was trained.. or could hone it constructively or fight with it.. it means he just took that leap of faith which is what Ben urged him to do, what Vader was concerned about at the conference room, and was the whole point of the film
Doesn't change the fact that it is a massive leap of faith in terms of the story.

No different than Rey, a person who has to live by her instincts in order to survive.

In agreement with Campe98: "Repeat to yourself 'it's just a show, I should really just relax.'" The MST3K mantra lives forever. If you're unable to do this, then write a fix-it fic.
Also this.
 
I get what the film is trying to say. But it doesn't change everything that happened before that. Any event that Luke had gone through it that movie would have been enough to destroy him. We're talking really emotionally traumatic events. Think about if you saw the people who raised you how Luke did when you returned to the homestead. Do you really think after a twenty minute drive that you'd be able to just go ahead and keep going without a moment of doubt? Maybe for a moment, but the time you got to the airport bar, you'd be in the corner in the fetal position, sobbing your eyes out. It is completely unrealistic. Yet we accept it, which is perfectly okay for a movie. Is what I'm saying making sense?
i am just saying he had faith in the moment he took the shot. I mean people that write these movies -- the good writers usually know their audience a little bit. Like in Back to the Future, they could have had Marty.. realistically wand reasonably in his dillemma.. they could have had him sulking in a fetal position at night at Doc's place panicking about his own existence. But that was not the type of film they were making.. they were making a cool fish out of water comedy with a dash of sci fi and a lot of wit, so the parts of the story they chose to show reflect what they were trying to so. similarly they could have had Luke dwell in the darkness but instead they wanted to recreate the old pulp sci fi serials and show a guy that was on his first adventure and probably didn't even realize how dangerous a situation he was in because he was so eager for adventure. This is addressed in the next film when Dak is basically what Luke was.. a guy that feels that he can take on the whole empire himself.. but even by that point in the film Luke knew that it wasn'; so simple , having been nearly killed, and frostbitten, rescued and now knowing what they were up against .

The thing I most appreciate about the original Star Wars.. is that it knows exactly what kind of film it is.. and doesn't let itself become bogged down .. doesn't look at any of the material from a cynical POV.
 
i am just saying he had faith in the moment he took the shot. I mean people that write these movies -- the good writers usually know their audience a little bit. Like in Back to the Future, they could have had Marty.. realistically wand reasonably in his dillemma.. they could have had him sulking in a fetal position at night at Doc's place panicking about his own existence. But that was not the type of film they were making.. they were making a cool fish out of water comedy with a dash of sci fi and a lot of wit, so the parts of the story they chose to show reflect what they were trying to so. similarly they could have had Luke dwell in the darkness but instead they wanted to recreate the old pulp sci fi serials and show a guy that was on his first adventure and probably didn't even realize how dangerous a situation he was in because he was so eager for adventure. This is addressed in the next film when Dak is basically what Luke was.. a guy that feels that he can take on the whole empire himself.. but even by that point in the film Luke knew that it wasn'; so simple , having been nearly killed, and frostbitten, rescued and now knowing what they were up against .

The thing I most appreciate about the original Star Wars.. is that it knows exactly what kind of film it is.. and doesn't let itself become bogged down .. doesn't look at any of the material from a cynical POV.

I get what you're saying. What I'm saying is that most of us just accept ANH for what it is, despite that. But you're continually claiming all of this stuff about verisimilitude, which means the appearance of being real. Dude, there is nothing real about that. And there's nothing cynical about believing that in reality, people would crumble if those events happened to them. We just accept it because the story would stop if we didn't. And that's fine. The point I'm making is: People accept what happened as much to Rey as it did to Luke because the story would stop if you didn't. There's nothing more than that. I'm not lessening ANH. I understand what both films are trying to do. I'm just saying that the verisimilitude you claim to cherish, at least for me, isn't there. This is a science fantasy saga. And I'm okay with the level of suspended belief I have to apply in order to enjoy it. That's all I'm saying.
 
The thing I most appreciate about the original Star Wars.. is that it knows exactly what kind of film it is.. and doesn't let itself become bogged down .. doesn't look at any of the material from a cynical POV.
That ship has long sailed, and under the guidance of Lucas no less. And you noted it well, that Luke had grown from wide eyed to a little more introspective and cautious. Characters grow and change and become more. They go through challenges and pain, depression and difficulty.

Despite wanting to recreate old serials, Lucas also wanted a very lived in universe, with characters who were highly believable, and relatable. Guess what? I relate very strongly to Luke in TLJ. That's not a weakness or a failing of the film or giving in to cynicism. That is a strength of a character for me to connect with in a powerful way.

One simply cannot remain on the adventure high forever. And Luke's journey is the foundational mythic arc that has been present in tales like "Morte de Arthur," "Robin Hood" as well as Greek heroes like Achilles and Odysseus.

Star Wars is no longer just the pulp serials. It has grown to far more.
 
I get what you're saying. What I'm saying is that most of us just accept ANH for what it is, despite that. But you're continually claiming all of this stuff about verisimilitude, which means the appearance of being real. Dude, there is nothing real about that. And there's nothing cynical about believing that in reality, people would crumble if those events happened to them. We just accept it because the story would stop if we didn't. And that's fine. The point I'm making is: People accept what happened as much to Rey as it did to Luke because the story would stop if you didn't. There's nothing more than that. I'm not lessening ANH. I understand what both films are trying to do. I'm just saying that the verisimilitude you claim to cherish, at least for me, isn't there. This is a science fantasy saga. And I'm okay with the level of suspended belief I have to apply in order to enjoy it. That's all I'm saying.
No sarcasm or irony.. ty for the kind words. :)
 
In my mind Luke touched the Force in that moment, let it take the shot.. put his faith in it. For that brief moment the Force guided him. Didn't mean he was trained.. or could hone it constructively or fight with it.. it means he just took that leap of faith which is what Ben urged him to do, what Vader was concerned about at the conference room, and was the whole point of the film

Right. A great shot. One in a million. Could he have done it again right after? Was that the only exhibition of the Force Luke displayed in Episode IV?

At the start of Episode V, Luke has trouble moving a small lightsaber from a snow bank to his hand. He puts a tremendous amount of effort into the feat and it's noticeable.

Rey on the other hand... seems to call upon the Force multiple times in Episode VII and even does the manipulating weak minds Jedi trick without ever seeming to have encountered a Force user at all and has had absolutely no training. Oh, and let's not forget Luke's lightsaber calling to her like she's something special.
 
Right. A great shot. One in a million. Could he have done it again right after? Was that the only exhibition of the Force Luke displayed in Episode IV?

At the start of Episode V, Luke has trouble moving a small lightsaber from a snow bank to his hand. He puts a tremendous amount of effort into the feat and it's noticeable.

Rey on the other hand... seems to call upon the Force multiple times in Episode VII and even does the manipulating weak minds Jedi trick without ever seeming to have encountered a Force user at all and has had absolutely no training. Oh, and let's not forget Luke's lightsaber calling to her like she's something special.
I think we are agreeing on the point (but disagreeing with most of the other people here).
I think he was able to use the Force a bit.. again the force was mainly using him, when he deflected the shots from the remote.

it's my favorite film and how the Force was used to tell a story was perfect. throughout the film we get so much imagery of how large scale the empire.. particularly the Death Star is, yet Vader knew that it was nothing compared to the Force and he was right.
It was a lucky shot, but it was still just a shot, regardless of whether there were five people on the Death Star or five thousand. I hate when people use the shot Luke took as a way to call him a mary sue. It's the whole point of the film.
 
He is what he is.
Exactly. Observing that Luke did something pretty much impossible or calling him a wish fulfillment character/Mary Sue doesn't somehow make the film less enjoyable. It simply establishes what the world of SW is like and about in terms of storytelling. And Rey fits right in to that world building, just like Luke.
 
Exactly. Observing that Luke did something pretty much impossible or calling him a wish fulfillment character/Mary Sue doesn't somehow make the film less enjoyable. It simply establishes what the world of SW is like and about in terms of storytelling. And Rey fits right in to that world building, just like Luke.

I'd prefer the term 'Mary Sue' just be dropped entirely. It really doesn't do the fanbase any good to constantly be in these pissing matched instead of celebrating how great the franchise is.
 
I'd prefer the term 'Mary Sue' just be dropped entirely. It really doesn't do the fanbase any good to constantly be in these pissing matched instead of celebrating how great the franchise is.
Fair enough. I think wish fulfillment/"everyman/woman/person" type character is perhaps a better term. A blank slate with which the audience can identify with and engage with.
 
REy is not even a character.. she's an agenda playing out on screen
ryFlqhz.jpg


Just when the discussion was moving in a semi-reasonable direction...we go back to the conspiracy theory garbage. Rey is like Luke is like Anakin. The only difference is in the individual audience member's minds.
 
Ni the only real difference was that Luke had challenges that he wasn't flawless.. that he was a typical hero. Rey is flawless.. and was KK's agenda playing out on screen.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top