So what? That doesn't mean the end of the b&m store, as you people keep implying. It means that the b&m store needs to adapt itself to play to it's strengths: primarily breadth of stock and customer service.
No, it doesn't mean the end of the brick and mortar store, but it does validate my point that millions of people
are taking advantage of this new way of renting media, and that not as many people have a problem with this as you seem to think they do. As for playing to it's strengths, Netflix has solid customer service and a
humongous breadth of stock.
Far easier for SOME. Others either lack the infrastructure to take advantage of it, or otherwise lack the DESIRE to do so.
I think your argument would have weight if this were the mid 1990's, but when it comes to Netflix, most people already have the infrastructure to utilize it. All you need is a PC with access to the internet, and a mailbox (and of course a DVD player).
Once again, we've been told "[tech] will mean the end of [conventional equivilant]" time and again, and 95%+ of the time this has not turned out to be the case. The weight of historical evidence is against you.
Yet I have said no such thing. As for the weight of historical evidence, you must remember that technology always moves forward, and history always moves backward. You could have said historical evidence was against the idea of people wanting to carry around a cellular phone when they have perfectly good phones at home. Now, you can watch movies on your cell phone, navigate anywhere in the world, share pictures, videos, chat with people across the globe and have live visual teleconferences between a group of people ten thousand miles apart, all in real time, using nothing more than a small device in the palm of one's hand.
Netflix has changed the game. Blockbuster can't keep up, and brick and mortar chains will need to adapt or die, and unfortunately, to adapt they'll need to sink tons of money into a rapidly changing medium.
J.