Have I noticed a drop off in interest for this show here and pretty much everywhere?
It's still the #1 show on television. The reason as to why no one in here is talking about it is because we're growing older and Star Trek (the reason this site exists) isn't attracting any new audience so the ST/AI "audience overlap" shrinks every season.
Word.
I like AI. It's great drama and I never watched it or understood it until season 4. Even if you believe all of the nonsense sputed by Vote For the Worst which I grant probably has some merit but has never been verified... SFW?
Enjoy it for what it is. For it being as fixed as its claimed to is how the hell do you explain Taylor Hicks or Ruben Studdard or Fantasia?
AI is fun because you get to watch people follow their dreams and be given a chance based on merit and talent to succeed and you take the journey with them. That's why it's enjoyed more success here than it has anywhere else because as clichéd as it sounds, it's representative of what we hope the American Dream is.
I've never found a reason to not like or dismiss AI offhand other than curmudgeonly cynicism but that seems to be par for the course quite often especially here.
People here tend to dismiss all reality shows as having no merit the same way that non-Trek fans dismiss Star Trek and sci fi as foolish. Neither stereotype is fair.
Just my two cents.
Doubtful.It's still the #1 show on television. The reason as to why no one in here is talking about it is because we're growing older and Star Trek (the reason this site exists) isn't attracting any new audience so the ST/AI "audience overlap" shrinks every season.
Word.
I like AI. It's great drama and I never watched it or understood it until season 4. Even if you believe all of the nonsense sputed by Vote For the Worst which I grant probably has some merit but has never been verified... SFW?
Enjoy it for what it is. For it being as fixed as its claimed to is how the hell do you explain Taylor Hicks or Ruben Studdard or Fantasia?
AI is fun because you get to watch people follow their dreams and be given a chance based on merit and talent to succeed and you take the journey with them. That's why it's enjoyed more success here than it has anywhere else because as clichéd as it sounds, it's representative of what we hope the American Dream is.
I've never found a reason to not like or dismiss AI offhand other than curmudgeonly cynicism but that seems to be par for the course quite often especially here.
People here tend to dismiss all reality shows as having no merit the same way that non-Trek fans dismiss Star Trek and sci fi as foolish. Neither stereotype is fair.
Just my two cents.
The thing is not based on merit, not at the very beginning anyway. To make room for all the contestant that haven't a chance of getting past the judges, the ones that are there to be made fun of and for the audience to laugh at because these poor people are led to believe they can sing, are taking the place of someone who can sing and has a chance of at least going to Hollywood.
It's based on merit. What you see on TV isn't the only round of judging in the cities. People go through and sing/perform for a group of off camera "judges" (read as: producers) who deem someone either good enough to get through to see Randy, Paula, Simon, and the other one so they can eventually go on to Hollywood...or they deem them bad enough to see the on air judges so it'll make good TV.
It's based on merit. What you see on TV isn't the only round of judging in the cities. People go through and sing/perform for a group of off camera "judges" (read as: producers) who deem someone either good enough to get through to see Randy, Paula, Simon, and the other one so they can eventually go on to Hollywood...or they deem them bad enough to see the on air judges so it'll make good TV.
Jackpot, Squiggy and more succinct than me.
It's based on merit. What you see on TV isn't the only round of judging in the cities. People go through and sing/perform for a group of off camera "judges" (read as: producers) who deem someone either good enough to get through to see Randy, Paula, Simon, and the other one so they can eventually go on to Hollywood...or they deem them bad enough to see the on air judges so it'll make good TV.
Jackpot, Squiggy and more succinct than me.
That they let in people who are only for good TV, is proof enough that the producers do not let people through based on merit. Who is to say that those rejected in favor of those who make good TV do not have any chance? Did William Hung ever have a chance, or did he take the one of the few places that a good singer could have taken?
Thousands go for the first round auditions, after a few days that's whittled down to down to just enough for the 3 judges to see over 2 or 3 days. Can anyone really say that out of thousands, a few more good singers could not have been found to fill those spots?
Jackpot, Squiggy and more succinct than me.
That they let in people who are only for good TV, is proof enough that the producers do not let people through based on merit. Who is to say that those rejected in favor of those who make good TV do not have any chance? Did William Hung ever have a chance, or did he take the one of the few places that a good singer could have taken?
Thousands go for the first round auditions, after a few days that's whittled down to down to just enough for the 3 judges to see over 2 or 3 days. Can anyone really say that out of thousands, a few more good singers could not have been found to fill those spots?
You've made the same point twice and it doesn't change what Squiggy and I both said. Those people that don't make it never had a spot to begin with, period. There's good and there's retarded and if you don't fall into one of those categories you aren't making it on the show. You assume that the retards are taking the spot of a better singer. They aren't. The spot never existed. There's is no in between category of better than retarded but not as good as the really good singers who made it.
That they let in people who are only for good TV, is proof enough that the producers do not let people through based on merit. Who is to say that those rejected in favor of those who make good TV do not have any chance? Did William Hung ever have a chance, or did he take the one of the few places that a good singer could have taken?
Thousands go for the first round auditions, after a few days that's whittled down to down to just enough for the 3 judges to see over 2 or 3 days. Can anyone really say that out of thousands, a few more good singers could not have been found to fill those spots?
You've made the same point twice and it doesn't change what Squiggy and I both said. Those people that don't make it never had a spot to begin with, period. There's good and there's retarded and if you don't fall into one of those categories you aren't making it on the show. You assume that the retards are taking the spot of a better singer. They aren't. The spot never existed. There's is no in between category of better than retarded but not as good as the really good singers who made it.
I made it twice because it is correct. You cannot say people are brought before the judges based on merit and then turn around and say they are also let in because they make good TV. That is not merit.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.