I'm particularly intrigued to see that the "Vulcan mind meld" term came from De Forest Research's notes. It's an odd anomaly, since TOS had never used that term prior to "Spectre" and "Elaan of Troyius," instead using terms like mind probe, mind touch, mind fusion, and mind link. (In the first season, it was only called "a Vulcan technique.") "Mind meld" was never used at all in TAS (which favored "mind touch" IIRC), and wasn't standardized until the movies, which were probably following the lead of The Making of Star Trek, which was written around this same time and also used "meld" for it. So basically that De Forest note was the first time it was ever used, making it strange that they cited it as the standard term.
I've never been quite clear on the whole business about the pseudonym to get around Coon's contract with Universal. Was Coon actually lying to Universal and breaching his contract? Would he have gotten in trouble if they found out? Or was it more of a polite fiction where Universal knew the truth but let Coon get away with it as long as everyone kept up appearances?
This is completely speculative, but maybe “mind meld” was the standard terminology in scene description and the like, even if dialogue was more variable.
Yeah...I just changed the to the same one you shared link. It had worked fine until just this morning!
I'm gay but man I cannot take my eyes off Cyd Charisse in the club dance scene. She's mesmerizing, and almost spider-like.
So I pulled up the de Forest Research reports on "Spock's Brain" since one of the "Spectre" reports refers the Coon re-using a term in both with different meanings.If we have the de Forest reports for “Spock’s Brain” that might also provide a clue since they refer to it in these notes.
Nope. My IRL name is Maurice also, Never heard of this Doug Dannger guy before, but I've been known to quote Nick Danger on occasion.Taking that into consideration, and that you care ferret out Star Trek facts in a journalistic fashion.... Are you Doug Dannger? (Phil Hendrie fans will get the reference)
Thanks Mike! Like many, we wished Cushman's books had been the last word. It would be a lot less work for us if they were, because we could just focus on our mission to put Star Trek in its historical context especially as far as the actual media landscape of its contemporaries and its predecessors. We try not to be all about debunking but there's just so much bad information out there it's rather impossible to try to tell the real story (as much as is possible) without having to address the elephants in the room that are the many oft poor "histories" and endlessly manufactured mythology. Cushman's a common target because people treat his books as the last word when they're demonstrably incorrect in many regards.FWIW, I lurk alot but don't comment much, as others often express my viewpoints in a much more articulate fashion than I'd probably be able to....so... I had originally purchased Mark Cushmans OS Trilogy, assuming that this would be the last word on the series. reading up on things here on this forum that seems to be far from the case, so Thank you Maurice and Harvey for the great job you are doing.
Mike
I missed this before. But a de Forest Research report on that episode warned of the similarity of the title and premise.Hmm... I wonder how many TOS episode titles were allusions to movie titles we've largely forgotten. I think "Spock's Brain" was probably an homage to the book and movie Donovan's Brain, which was pretty well-known at the time.
Also include the kid lift out of TWOK though that is movie era.
We covered that in a piece for WhatCulture that they made into a video (link). There's not a lot more to say about it except that Eddie Egan told us they couldn't get the kid to do what they wanted in the transporter room so that scene was scrapped.Also include the kid lift out of TWOK though that is movie era.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.