That would fall under your "win-win" category.
David's never heard of the Kobayashi Maru. If he had, he'd kill everyone.Scott Pearson said:
That would fall under your "win-win" category.
Not everyone . . . a lot of people, sure, a ship, a fleet, maybe even a planet or two. Okay, maybe, if pushed, an entire dimension of the multiverse, but not everyone. There are always some witnesses/survivors. Of course, we don't really know what he's up to in the Destiny trilogy yet . . .Xeris said:
David's never heard of the Kobayashi Maru. If he had, he'd kill everyone.Scott Pearson said:
That would fall under your "win-win" category.
XO: "Captain Mack, there's a civilian ship trapped on the wrong side of the Neutral Zone!"Xeris said:
David's never heard of the Kobayashi Maru.
I guess that would be one way to deal with the no-win scenario.David Mack said:
XO: "Captain Mack, there's a civilian ship trapped on the wrong side of the Neutral Zone!"Xeris said:
David's never heard of the Kobayashi Maru.
ME: "Target photon torpedoes on their engines and fire."
XO: "Sir?"
ME: "We can't risk an interstellar incident to save them, but I'll be damned if I let the enemy capture them. Fire at will until there's nothing large enough left to shoot. I'll be in my ready room having a scotch."
I was just thinking the same thing!David cgc said:
Oh. My. God. It just snapped into sharp relief.
David Mack
Mackenzie Calhoun
And I'll just bet no one has ever seen the two of you in the same room at the same time!
David Mack said:
XO: "Captain Mack, there's a civilian ship trapped on the wrong side of the Neutral Zone!"Xeris said:
David's never heard of the Kobayashi Maru.
ME: "Target photon torpedoes on their engines and fire."
XO: "Sir?"
ME: "We can't risk an interstellar incident to save them, but I'll be damned if I let the enemy capture them. Fire at will until there's nothing large enough left to shoot. I'll be in my ready room having a scotch."
David Mack said:
ME: "... Fire at will until there's nothing large enough left to shoot."
David Mack said:
^ When it first came out, a lot of people who commented on it, either here, on Amazon, or to me at conventions, dismissed it as nothing more than an action piece that did nothing to advance the overall storyline of the post-finale DS9 books. There are clues to future DS9 novels' story arcs embedded in different parts of the narrative, but because they will become "obvious" only in retrospect, some readers have assumed the book is just a "waste of time" --- especially since it ends on a cliffhanger.
Other readers accused me of lifting the ending sequence from Aliens (which is ridiculous -- the parallels are superficial at best, and could be applied to many other SF films and books published before and after Aliens -- it has as much in common with the end of Return of the Jedi). In fact, the visual symbolism at work in the final Prynn/Vaughn sequence in Grennokar is rooted in the psychology of confronting depression caused by a dysfunctional father-child relationship.
Another issue that has plagued me is that it suffers from "middle chapter syndrome". Some of my friends and family tried to be supportive of my work by reading the book, only to find themselves hopelessly lost. Warpath is so dependent upon the reader's familiarity with the complex, ongoing narrative of the PF-DS9 books that it really can't be enjoyed on its own. By contrast, my TNG duology, my Vanguard books, my Mirror Universe story, and my Wolverine novel all can be read and enjoyed on their own.
I'm still proud of the book itself. Line by line, and in the context of its series' big picture, I think it works. The bottom line regarding Warpath is that it is exactly what I was asked to deliver. Marco hired me to write a fast-paced, action-oriented adventure ride, and that's what I did.
David Mack said:
^ Well, come on back, pal! The more the merrier...![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.