Impact on Star Trek as Disney reboot Star Wars.

Don't get me started on definitely being spelled "defiantly".

 

"Then" for "than", "threw" for "through"...

 

No it makes me want to rid myself of them. The twitching defriend finger is palsied now.

 

Finally and Finale

Though to and too actually makes understanding some posts difficult and causes me to have to read a sentence 2 or 3 times

 

"Loose" for "lose," "rouge" for "rogue."

And, getting all Trekkie on you, "Kahn" for "Khan."

 

The worst, of course, is it's for its.

 

Like Star Trek did with John Logan and Stuart Baird?

 

Their's no way that's true. If anyone tells you so, there lying.

 

If we look at SW writers for example, it's a mixed bag.

 

their defiantly lying just like teh emporer

 

One impact I hope it has on Trek is that we get more of the stuff, without again compromising quality, of course.

GR once spoke of the Galaxy being a big place with room for a lot of stories to be told and I agree. It is every bit as big as a galaxy far, far away so why not get on the ball and take more advantage of all those stories left to tell.

That other franchise is going to do that and so should Star Trek. If they continue to mosey along down the highway at such a leisurely pace they are likely to be left far, far behind.

 

Hey, it worked with Nicholas Meyer and Harve Bennett.

 

This is getting redonkulous...

 

They learned a few lessons since then, assuming their contributions to the latest Bond film were of any significance (Logan as co-writer and Baird as chief film editor). Just sayin'.

 

You should of told them off.

 

As for the new star wars/star trek films it was the worst of times it was the best of times.