Re: If you're outside time when the universe changes... You stay the s
Ah ok. But I was automaticaly discounting the single timeline being re-written method of time travel because that is the one method that scientists universally reject. Whatever the characters' own perceptions and theories seen on screen, if we accept that the laws of physics apply unless we are expressly told differently, then I prefer to follow the theory that is consistent with what phycisists say is possible.
Your mileage may vary since a lot of trek tech is impossible given our current knowledge of physics but re-writing the history of your own timeline is universally panned by everybody except sci fi writers and there is an alternative explanation that scientists are willing to gie a tiny bit of credibility.
Plus, ST Online is an alternate timeline in and of itself.
No, it isn't. Path to 2409 is Prime timeline after the destruction of Romulus.
Pauln6 said:Where you have several, inconsistent methods of time travel you should pick the one that is consistent with the most material.
There is no reason different methods of time travel cannot coexist if based on different circumstances. Since we have never seen red matter black hole time travel before, there is zero inconsistency on the subject of how red matter black hole time travel works.
Ah ok. But I was automaticaly discounting the single timeline being re-written method of time travel because that is the one method that scientists universally reject. Whatever the characters' own perceptions and theories seen on screen, if we accept that the laws of physics apply unless we are expressly told differently, then I prefer to follow the theory that is consistent with what phycisists say is possible.
Your mileage may vary since a lot of trek tech is impossible given our current knowledge of physics but re-writing the history of your own timeline is universally panned by everybody except sci fi writers and there is an alternative explanation that scientists are willing to gie a tiny bit of credibility.