But VOYAGER never really measured up to TOS and TNG. It's my opinion that those two shows had higher highs, whereas VOYAGER was usually middling.

Last edited:
But VOYAGER never really measured up to TOS and TNG. It's my opinion that those two shows had higher highs, whereas VOYAGER was usually middling.
EnterpriseUnless one has thoughts about re-writing the other four TREK shows
More than a Decon Chamber, Vulcan Nuropressure or Erotic Troi Foot Rub™ scene, that's for sure.Well please enlighten us. What would a sex scene do for a plot?
At it's most basic, immediately establish intimacy between two (or more) characters. Establish the type of relationship as well. That said, I can't really see it having a place in Berman-era Star Trek or it's target audience. Discovery's use in it's unique context worked quite well and was anything but "titillating".We are all grown ups, we know people have sex, so why would we need to see it? Also if it's gritty you should probably consult a doctor.
I think a lot of Trek fans like imagining a different Voyager simply because the very premise of the concept had a lot more potential than the show actually took advantage of.
Enterprise
Set 30 years after Cochrane's first warp flight achieved warp three.
Enterprise
Which is applying very 21st century mentality to relationships and sex in the 23rd/24th centuries. Look at how such things have moved on in the last century, from the Victorian mindset, notions of sex before marriage being pretty much taboo, the role of women in marriage, the fact that same sex relationships were illegal, etc. How society might view sex may be vastly different, especially taking into account alien perspectives on the matter (Deltan's don't just take an Oath of Celibacy for the sake of it). Even today how many people have had a fling or one-nighter with someone where the only sense of intimacy was the proximity of body parts, the likes of Kirk and Riker hopped into so many beds that it was almost a sport as opposed to anything with any real meaning.At it's most basic, immediately establish intimacy between two (or more) characters. Establish the type of relationship as well. That said, I can't really see it having a place in Berman-era Star Trek or it's target audience. Discovery's use in it's unique context worked quite well and was anything but "titillating".
So you're saying because attitudes to sex will change they shouldn't show it?Which is applying very 21st century mentality to relationships and sex in the 23rd/24th centuries. Look at how such things have moved on in the last century, from the Victorian mindset, notions of sex before marriage being pretty much taboo, the role of women in marriage, the fact that same sex relationships were illegal, etc. How society might view sex may be vastly different, especially taking into account alien perspectives on the matter (Deltan's don't just take an Oath of Celibacy for the sake of it). Even today how many people have had a fling or one-nighter with someone where the only sense of intimacy was the proximity of body parts, the likes of Kirk and Riker hopped into so many beds that it was almost a sport as opposed to anything with any real meaning.
I don't agree with many of these fans. I think it's all about sexism and that after so many years, many still cannot deal with a female lead in a Trek show.
I'm curious about where you're reading that. Maybe I skimmed the forums too often, but I haven't heard anyone suggest that Voyager would have gotten home at the end of the pilot if a man was the captain.
Oh, please. I, for one, was so intent on that incarnation of Trek having a female captain, that I declared my intention not to watch the show if its commanding officer was male! Having watched Trek since I was a teenage girl, and endured the indignities of "Captain, I'm frightened" and episodes like "Turnabout Intruder," having seen the leading women of TNG cast in traditional, "nurturing" roles, I wanted more than anything to see a female captain, a woman who was as capable in her own right as Kirk or Picard or Sisko were in theirs. You may be sure I had absolutely no complaint about the gender of the captain, the series star -- entirely the reverse! I was thrilled, delighted, and satisfied to finally see someone of my own gender in the center seat.I don't agree with many of these fans. I think it's all about sexism and that after so many years, many still cannot deal with a female lead in a Trek show.
I couldn't even make it through DS9I don't agree with many of these fans. I think it's all about sexism and that after so many years, many still cannot deal with a female lead in a Trek show. If "VOYAGER" is guilty of not fulfilling its "potential", then so is "DEEP SPACE NINE", in my opinion. In fact, I believe the 1993-99 series had the potential to rise above the other Trek shows, thanks to its premise. But as far as I'm concerned, that potential was wasted. But I still love the show.
And rarely formed pair-bonds?? Nope.The people of Voyager rarely acted like people who were isolated from the rest of their civilization, or families, or worlds; they never made themselves "at home," and rarely formed pair-bonds.
Well I just disagree. DS9 did not capture my imagination or sense of adventure at all.DS9 is the best of all the shows, though TOS is still my favorite.
Well I just disagree. DS9 did not capture my imagination or sense of adventure at all.
Ds9 does not have a sense of humor about itself the way the other shows do. It takes itself a little too seriously while not delivering on it. It's much less profound than it purports to be.
If I could change one thing, it would be that dynamic and that tension for at least a season.Make some use of the fact that some of the crew belonged to the Maquis, and by that, I mean much more than what has been done.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.