I contend that ejecting the Tardigrade was an act of professional selfishness on the part of Lt. Stamets let's not confuse human ego with altruism. Is this not the same man who said, and I quote:It was an act of compassion on Burnham, Tilly, and Stamet's parts from as soon as they learned the creature was sentient/sapient and suffering, and (eventually) on Saru's part as well. Stamets risked his life for it, Tilly her career, and Burnham risked her life (by testing its sapience in not attacking her) and her only chance at some semblance of redemption with Starfleet to do the right thing.
"If I go, I'm taking everything with me. My spores, my drive. This entire ship was designed around my scientific speciality." "I've spent my entire career trying to grasp the essence of mycelium. Now for the first time I do.
I saw the network. An entire universe of possibilities."
And what of science specialist and convicted mutineer Michael Burnham? Are we expected to take anything this defendant says as nothing less than a means to an end to redeem her own reputation? Risk her own life?? Tell that to Security Officer Landry now sadly deceased and whose job is presently occupied by Michael's Burnham's current lover! I implore you not to be fooled.
So now we come to the word of cadet Sylvia Tilly. An apnoea afflicted young woman with delusions of grandeur of one day becoming a Starfleet Captain once she overcomes a fabric allergy and the unfortunate social immaturity of needing to express profanity in the work environment.
I suggest these are not examples of humanity that should be taken at their word.
(By the way I'm just kind of kidding here, playing devil 'Q' advocate).

Last edited: