As to people giving you the relavent local links and support you need, I love the way we all pull together here in times of need. Beautiful.
Me too. It's why I'm proud to be a part of this community.
I've faxed the police report to my apartment manager. I've written a 30 day notice of my intent to move but have not yet sent it.
In cases of disputed rent or the contention of unsafe environment in Maryland, we have the option of paying our rent into escrow until the dispute is resolved. That generally results in official mediation of the dispute. Does California not have a similar option?In the 30 day notice, I explained why I am unable to continue living in the complex, and how the management's apathy and uncooperative nature has forced me to seek relocation. Tomorrow I must drop off my rent check (can I write write "fuck you motherfucking bitches" in the memo space?).
I've faxed the police report to my apartment manager. I've written a 30 day notice of my intent to move but have not yet sent it.
Send it Registered Mail!!! If you've already sent it regular mail, SEND IT AGAIN.
In the 30 day notice, I explained why I am unable to continue living in the complex, and how the management's apathy and uncooperative nature has forced me to seek relocation. Tomorrow I must drop off my rent check (can I write write "fuck you motherfucking bitches" in the memo space?).
Some one has sent me the verbatim rental code on relocating after a domestic violence incident. There is no escrow provision.In cases of disputed rent or the contention of unsafe environment in Maryland, we have the option of paying our rent into escrow until the dispute is resolved. That generally results in official mediation of the dispute. Does California not have a similar option?
Try looking here: http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/resolve-problems.shtml. Anyway, it's clear you need to consult a lawyer. If the legal aid society doesn't get back to you very soon, you may want to contact the local bar association.
This case in CA was in reference to a mobile home park, but it may be useful. Just some possible ammunition to take to your lawyer consult.Unless the lease provides otherwise, there is an implied warranty or covenant by the landlord that during the term of the tenancy, the tenant is entitled to "quiet enjoyment" of the premises. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals has held that even where the disruption to tenant's quiet enjoyment is caused not by the landlord but by another tenant, the disruption may be attributable to the landlord because the landlord could take action (such as notification and, if necessary, eviction) against the offending tenant.
When the landlord fails to correct or terminate the disturbance, and the disturbance seriously interferes with the tenant's use and enjoyment of the leased premises, the tenant is justified in abandoning the premises. Tenant who leaves under these conditions will have no further obligation to pay rent. In the eyes of the law, the landlord has breached the covenant of quiet enjoyment and has "constructively evicted" the tenant. Landlord may be required to compensate tenant for moving expenses, attorney's fees, and other expenses resulting from the constructive eviction. (The Court of Special Appeals case is Bocchini v. Gorn Management Co., 69 Md. App.1 (1986).)
NOTE: The facts in Bocchini v. Gorn, mentioned above, were that the landlord knew about the problem and failed to take action against a tenant who persisted over a period of several months in making very disturbing noises and also threatened the complaining tenant after she asked him to modify his behavior and after she asked the landlord for help. The court stated that these facts constituted a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and supported the tenant's claim that she had been constructively evicted.
“Quiet enjoyment” does not simply refer to issues of noise. Rather, it denotes the ability to enjoy the premises “free from disturbance, interference, or dispute…” If, for example, a neighbor were to continually block your access to and from your garage, that would interfere with your quiet enjoyment of the property.
When it is said that a rental agreement implies – whether or not it is spelled out – that a tenant will have quiet enjoyment of a property, this does not mean only that the landlord will refrain from interfering with that enjoyment. It also means that the landlord will not allow other tenants to interfere with that enjoyment. Conversely, the landlord cannot be held responsible for other neighbors – ones who are not tenants of the landlord – interfering with that enjoyment. For that, one would have to engage law enforcement.
^Good to hear you're making some progress on the lawyer front.
On the tennancy law question, this may not fall under domestic violence, but under a "Quiet Enjoyment and Constructive Eviction" clause in the law. It's pretty common, from what I can see. From the MD state law:
This case in CA was in reference to a mobile home park, but it may be useful. Just some possible ammunition to take to your lawyer consult.Unless the lease provides otherwise, there is an implied warranty or covenant by the landlord that during the term of the tenancy, the tenant is entitled to "quiet enjoyment" of the premises. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals has held that even where the disruption to tenant's quiet enjoyment is caused not by the landlord but by another tenant, the disruption may be attributable to the landlord because the landlord could take action (such as notification and, if necessary, eviction) against the offending tenant.
When the landlord fails to correct or terminate the disturbance, and the disturbance seriously interferes with the tenant's use and enjoyment of the leased premises, the tenant is justified in abandoning the premises. Tenant who leaves under these conditions will have no further obligation to pay rent. In the eyes of the law, the landlord has breached the covenant of quiet enjoyment and has "constructively evicted" the tenant. Landlord may be required to compensate tenant for moving expenses, attorney's fees, and other expenses resulting from the constructive eviction. (The Court of Special Appeals case is Bocchini v. Gorn Management Co., 69 Md. App.1 (1986).)
NOTE: The facts in Bocchini v. Gorn, mentioned above, were that the landlord knew about the problem and failed to take action against a tenant who persisted over a period of several months in making very disturbing noises and also threatened the complaining tenant after she asked him to modify his behavior and after she asked the landlord for help. The court stated that these facts constituted a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and supported the tenant's claim that she had been constructively evicted.
eta: Here's an article that provides more information:
“Quiet enjoyment” does not simply refer to issues of noise. Rather, it denotes the ability to enjoy the premises “free from disturbance, interference, or dispute…” If, for example, a neighbor were to continually block your access to and from your garage, that would interfere with your quiet enjoyment of the property.
When it is said that a rental agreement implies – whether or not it is spelled out – that a tenant will have quiet enjoyment of a property, this does not mean only that the landlord will refrain from interfering with that enjoyment. It also means that the landlord will not allow other tenants to interfere with that enjoyment. Conversely, the landlord cannot be held responsible for other neighbors – ones who are not tenants of the landlord – interfering with that enjoyment. For that, one would have to engage law enforcement.
You're assuming that all attempts to "fight the power", whether that power is an attacker or the system, will be unsuccessful. That's kind of a losing mindset.If everybody had her mindset, we'd have a bunch of physically fucked up people who cant' get justice.
JAmes Bond:
And had you actually been reading this thread, you would have seen that it was Bears herself who said that she would have not been able to live with herself had she not interfered, and perhaps allowed the other victim to be killed. Had she not been incredibly heroic as she was, she would have just been thrust into another terrible emotional and mental situation.
Anyway, I don't want to get into a debate with someone who simply won't understand what's actually going on. This thread is for us to support Bears through this atrocity.
I've faxed the police report to my apartment manager. I've written a 30 day notice of my intent to move but have not yet sent it.
Send it Registered Mail!!! If you've already sent it regular mail, SEND IT AGAIN.
I was intending to give it to them in person when I turn in my rent, with witnesses.
You could always move to North Dakota, as it's fairly cheap to live here. Of course it's fucking cold here a good 4-5 months out of the year.The relocating thing is overwhelming in part because I really don't want to live in LA anymore. I've spent 2 1/2 years here and I still don't care much for the city nor have I made any career headway while here. If there was ever an opportunity to get the hell out of Dodge, I think this is it.
Hell, at this point I don't even like California very much. It's too expensive to live here and its about to get more expensive because the state is in such a shit hole deficit.
If my boyfriend and most of my close family weren't in California, I'd pack up and move to Phoenix to be with my sister. It's still not out of the question. But, barring that, I like Orange, San Diego and even Riverside Counties more than I like LA County. I like the desert areas. I also like the Bay Area but its very expensive and damp. My now twice broken foot doesn't do damp. It's a humidity diva.
So I have a lot to think about. I want to telecommute but whether work will let me remains to be seen. If they let me telecommute, that means I can go anywhere. If I can go anywhere, I will tell LA to fuck off. I just don't know where the hell to go next.
I shouldn't even be trying to make a decision like this at this time, but I gotta choose NOW.
Aye yayayay.
Send it Registered Mail!!! If you've already sent it regular mail, SEND IT AGAIN.
I was intending to give it to them in person when I turn in my rent, with witnesses.
I'd still send it registered with a return receipt (or at least Delivery Confirmation). That way they can't bullshit you about never getting it, forcing you to deal with the word of witnesses.
...and I'm JuanBolio.I can bench 350, walk thru most front doors like wet cardboard, and a grip that has crushed jaws. Add into it I am a big, ugly and menacing looking mofo.![]()
Similarly, there is no sexual battery that occurred here because the state has to prove that the suspect's intent was lascivious (i.e. there was some sexual gratification from it). That's not the case here.
Similarly, there is no sexual battery that occurred here because the state has to prove that the suspect's intent was lascivious (i.e. there was some sexual gratification from it). That's not the case here.
Excuse me?The guy ripped her shirt off. What other intent could he possibly have HAD?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.