It was a great design that was hardly used, and it fitted the writers' bible specifications. Did you have the same complaint when the Enterprise-B reused the Excelsior model?
That's not really the same, because the Excelsior was consistent with the timeframe of the E-B and the ship had been assumed to be an Excelsior for years anyway. It was depicted as such on TNG long before Generations "confirmed" it canonically. The only real complaint about the B was that they added a bunch of unnecessary stuff to the Excelsior model to make the ship look "special."
As for the Pasteur, while it clearly draws some design elements from the conjectural Daedalus design, it's also reasonably distinct. And that both ships share design elements does not automatically mean that the Pasteur was derived from the Daedalus. It may be that Starfleet has a number of designs that use spherical hull modules, and we've simply seen them rarely.
I don't really want to dive into the can of worms here, as that's a separate topic from the original one. On a personal level, I do agree with Trekker - while one could argue that the Akira could have been derived from the NX, the reality is that the producers were lazy and cut corners. They modeled the NX on the Akira because it was a "cool" and "popular" design, not because they could have created something more original and more in keeping with the overall continuity of Trek.
And that's all I'll say about that.

