• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I just realized why I rate TMP as the best movie!

I'd say designed for the sake of bad design ... shoot, look at another 1979 flick that could be called 'designed just for design's sake' ... ALIEN (or any R Scott flick.) The difference is that the Scott films, regardless of their flaws in design and plot, at least look interesting. I hate the exposed and easily-bumped-into toggle switches in ALIEN, but acknowledge that the look works. TMP's color scheme and lack of detail (not even vents in the consoles, nothing to please the eye) manages to make scientific credibility look like a bad thing. And lighting from the floor makes everybody look bad as well as being nonsensical, unless you have everybody on the bridge lying on their backs on the floor to read their clipboards.
 
EEE said:
Bingo! Thank you for seeing that. I never see that mentioned.
It's mentioned in every ST:TMP best/worst thread.

It's also bullshit perpetrated by people who can't see past the superficial similarity between the two, completely missing the many obvious fundamental differences.
 
St Nicholas said:
You forgot to mentioned that Spock finally came to terms with his human half and was no longer afraid of it and since that time he bagan to embrace and use it.

Indeed, that was Spock's "obvious and essential" thing: that his humanity--his friendships--were what made life worth living.

Blitzen said:
EEE said:
Bingo! Thank you for seeing that. I never see that mentioned.
It's mentioned in every ST:TMP best/worst thread.

It's also bullshit perpetrated by people who can't see past the superficial similarity between the two, completely missing the many obvious fundamental differences.

:lol: Bad cop to my good?
 
Blitzen said:
EEE said:
Bingo! Thank you for seeing that. I never see that mentioned.
It's mentioned in every ST:TMP best/worst thread.

It's also bullshit perpetrated by people who can't see past the superficial similarity between the two, completely missing the many obvious fundamental differences.

So, are you saying it would be OK for every Trek movie to be superficially very similar to a TOS episode? Couldn't the "fundamental differences" have been expressed in a different story?
 
In TMP, Shatner played Kirk very much like he did in TOS, a no nonsense, man of action. If he seemed less happy it was because he had been behind a desk too long, and without green alien pussy.

In Star Trek II, Shatner started playing Kirk in a different way. He was softer and didn't have the same kind of likable, slightly pompous, stoicism.
 
Armus said:
In TMP, Shatner played Kirk very much like he did in TOS, a no nonsense, man of action. If he seemed less happy it was because he had been behind a desk too long, and without green alien pussy.

I dunno, Kirk never had THAT much of a stick up his ass. It helps that McCoy calls him on it.

In Star Trek II, Shatner started playing Kirk in a different way. He was softer and didn't have the same kind of likable, slightly pompous, stoicism.

The Kirk of TWOK was older. I think it was entirely consistent with the character as played in TOS. People start to have doubts as they hit middle age. Believe me.
 
I think that's the point. The Kirk of TMP was essentially supposed to be the Kirk of the series, except that he was grouchy because he had been behind a desk too long. OTOH, the Kirk of TWOK was supposed to be an older, more mature and (at that particular time) rather depressed version of the character who, by the end of the film, lost the depressed part as he came to terms with his aging and what life still had to offer him.

It's actually some fairly good character development between the two films that was unfortunately lost as Shatner stopped playing Kirk in later films and just started playing William Shatner.
 
CorporalClegg said:
Or maybe TMP is the best Star Trek movie because it's the only one that's actually STAR TREK!?

And people wonder where the Trekkie stereotype comes from...
 
^ ...and if he'd written "Or maybe TWOK is the best Star Trek movie because it's the only one that's actually STAR TREK" he would have been what?

A dolt?
devil-smiley-009.gif
 
elton said:
EEE said:
Bingo! Thank you for seeing that. I never see that mentioned.
It's mentioned in every ST:TMP best/worst thread.
No, it hasn't been. The operative phrase was "I never see." Not "you never see."

elton said:It's also bullshit perpetrated by people who can't see past the superficial similarity between the two, completely missing the many obvous fundamental differences.
Your (unecessarily vehement) statement is a non sequitur, as proven by your need to say it.
 
EEE said:
No, it hasn't been. The operative phrase was "I never see." Not "you never see."
Yeah, that changes everything.
Your (unecessarily vehement) statement is a non sequitur, as proven by your need to say it.
Only for those who didn't see it.
 
CorporalClegg said:
Or maybe TMP is the best Star Trek movie because it's the only one that's actually STAR TREK!?
I think it's the best Trek movie because so far it's the only one that has been a movie in terms of cinematic 'oomph'. The rest have been jumped-up telemovies, in my opinion.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top