That wouldn't have been possible even if she stayed until the end of the series, given she wasn't introduced until the second season. So at most you'd get six seasons of Pulaski.Should have been there for all seven.
That wouldn't have been possible even if she stayed until the end of the series, given she wasn't introduced until the second season. So at most you'd get six seasons of Pulaski.Should have been there for all seven.
Should have and Could have are two different things.That wouldn't have been possible even if she stayed until the end of the series, given she wasn't introduced until the second season. So at most you'd get six seasons of Pulaski.
But that ignores the context of how the character was even created, specifically in this case when they had to create a new character to be the ship's doctor in the second season, they decided in reaction to fan response to the first season this new character should be more in line with a TOS character. They would not have thought up such a character when planning out the first season because they were trying to distance the show from TOS to be its own thing. And for that very reason, even if Pulaski were there in Farpoint, they most certainly would not have made her McCoy's granddaughter. One of Roddenberry's first rules for TNG was that there wasn't to be those kind of connections to TOS.Should have and Could have are two different things.
She should have been introduced in Farpoint, with Admiral McCoy coming to see off his granddaughter. The cast would have had no reasons to feel a certain way about her, and the Data stuff would have happened at the beginning of the series. Its a Feature, not a Bug applies - she would have been an instant fan favorite.
well yeah, thats why i said should, instead of would, or even could. I have never agreed with most of Roddenberry's rules. He SHOULD have had a TOS lineage character in there from the beginning. Shrug. (and they referenced TOS in the second episode, so they never listened to their own rules anyways.) The first two seasons had a lot more TOS dna in it then what came later, and it is why they are my favorite seasons.But that ignores the context of how the character was even created, specifically in this case when they had to create a new character to be the ship's doctor in the second season, they decided in reaction to fan response to the first season this new character should be more in line with a TOS character. They would not have thought up such a character when planning out the first season because they were trying to distance the show from TOS to be its own thing. And for that very reason, even if Pulaski were there in Farpoint, they most certainly would not have made her McCoy's granddaughter. One of Roddenberry's first rules for TNG was that there wasn't to be those kind of connections to TOS.
More Dedicated than Beverly?Dedicated means putting a lot of time and effort in. Essentially it’s like ‘hard-working’.
People often say I’m a dedicated teacher. I’ve never taken it to mean ‘better than others’, just an indicator that I work hard and 99% of the time tend to make sure that the job gets done.
I don’t know, Guy.
I don’t even really know why I’m having this conversation at all… I think I posted in this thread when I was high.
Eugenics is illegal in the Federation.
Rascals.
Uh, you might remember that we are talking about a work of fiction. In a body of fiction where a ban on eugenics did not become canonical, so far as I can recall, until eight years after this episode aired.
Hey!
Isn't a Therapist a Physician?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.