Maybe it's God. I hear that to know the face of God is to know madness.So...there's something...and we don't know how big it is...viewable only from the South Pole from it's trajectory between Sag and Scorpio...and it'll get here in 3 years?
So...there's something...and we don't know how big it is...viewable only from the South Pole from it's trajectory between Sag and Scorpio...and it'll get here in 3 years?
I guess this is the result of "doing research," as Tachyon Shield suggested.I love all this Nibiru stuff.
You know it was invented by some crazy bitch in 2000, it's not even historical. There's nothing from before that time that even mentions this horseshit, it's just been perpetuated and retconned by various conspiracy nuts on the Internet since that time.
She claims she was told about the approach of 'Nibiru' by Zeta Reticulians (yeah, those guys with the gray faces and the big eyes) via paranormal means, and was totally convinced by them that the world was going to end in May 2000.
Oh wait, it didn't.
So then she revised it to 2003.
Oh well, still no Nibiru...
So now it's 2010 or 2012 (which just happens to match up with this stupid-ass "Mayan calendar" nonsense that isn't even significant, please see here for an explanation).
Excuse me if I'm not worried.
Just to put some of the claims about Nibiru in to context:
- Nibiru and/or a tenth planet IS NOT talked about in ancient texts. Zechariah Sitchin MADE THIS UP.
- There is no indication astronomically of an object in our Solar system this size, or indeed any size. Every single planet discovered has been discovered by telescopes with less resolving power than what you can buy in a shop thanks to modern precision lens technology. Additionally, the maths shows no perturbations in any of the planets' orbits or wobble of the Sun to indicate an object of this size.
- There are not more earthquakes than normal, please read the Earthquake myths page here if you want to know more. They are better reported by the media than they used to be, which can lead us to believe there are more, but the number of quakes of different magnitudes has remained unchanged since we started recording them. It's just that before, we might've ignored a magnitude 5.5 earthquake in China, but now, we have Wikipedia.
- Likewise, there hasn't been an increase in 'freak weather'.
- BROWN DWARFS emit significant amounts of EM radiation, you know like light, and heat. If 'Nemesis' existed and was in our back yard, we could easily detect it. They are indeed old stars at the end of their life, but they're not dead balls of rock.
I could go on.
But honestly it's not worth my time.
Please, by all means go and build your bomb shelter and stay in there if you wish.
That's the research of ignorance.
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.
Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all. None of that is evidence, but there is plenty of other evidence proving it's there and cataclysms are coming, cataclysms that come around in cycles. You have to sift through the false stuff to find the real evidence.
When you research something don't just look for evidence against something and then leave it at that because you'll always find something or other no matter what the subject, you should search for the evidence in favour as well. That kind of evidence is there, there's plenty of it but hard to find because everyone who knows of the subject of Nibiru come out with bullshit. Just go on youtube and you'll see people are putting up bullshit videos saying they've got photos of Nibiru. You sift through the rubbish and find the truth.
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.
But basically all the Niburu-nonsense is made up by or connected to Zechariah Sitchin's imagination...
I still don't know where you get your certainty from.
Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?
And why are you so opposed to providing the evidence behind your "truth"?
I guess I didn't realize I was studying for a Nibiru exam.That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.
But basically all the Niburu-nonsense is made up by or connected to Zechariah Sitchin's imagination...
I still don't know where you get your certainty from.
See, you believe the whole Nibiru thing is connected only to Sitchin, it isn't and you'd know that if you bothered to find out.
I'm not bothered if you're not going to research the subject in more depth and just think Nibiru is all to do with Sitchin. Your choice.
Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?
And why are you so opposed to providing the evidence behind your "truth"?
The evidence is all over the place and there's also a lot of shit out there, you've got to research yourself to find the relevant evidence. I've seen all the evidence in question but it's something you come across and find on your own. I can't direct you to specific material because it's all over the place and some of the real evidence is actually buried in the shit and you've got to pick it out.
I could direct you to something with the evidence and you'll read some of the shit and immediately dismiss it instead of studying it and finding the relevant evidence.
If I do your math for you then you're not going to learn how to do an equation. Do you get me?
If i'm going to teach you to ride a bike I don't ride the bike for you.
Wait a second...this all reminds me of something...
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.