• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

I Am Officially Pooping My Pants Now!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So...there's something...and we don't know how big it is...viewable only from the South Pole from it's trajectory between Sag and Scorpio...and it'll get here in 3 years?
 
"Breaking News: Some person on a forum dedicated to the television classic cult show Star Trek finds out that world will soon end due to what could be a massive thing headed towards Earth or just a smudge on his telescope. More at 11. Also at 11, is corn really healthy? New studies are inconclusive..."
 
So...there's something...and we don't know how big it is...viewable only from the South Pole from it's trajectory between Sag and Scorpio...and it'll get here in 3 years?
Maybe it's God. I hear that to know the face of God is to know madness.

Maybe Tachyon Shield saw the face of God hiding behind the big black square and then went nuts.
 
So...there's something...and we don't know how big it is...viewable only from the South Pole from it's trajectory between Sag and Scorpio...and it'll get here in 3 years?

Or may only pass through the Oort Cloud. And it's viewable only in infrared light. And it might be made out of dark matter (which wouldn't be viewable in infrared). Or it might be a dark star.

So, if "people" have seen this object and have observed it enough to know that it's moving--apparently at an enormous speed--then wouldn't those same people have been able to plot its course with a fair degree of accuracy? Certainly with more accuracy than it might hit us or it might pass through the Oort Cloud--which is THOUSANDS of AUs from us?

And to reference a post sometime back that I can't be troubled to find and quote: we do sometimes miss asteroids until they are practically right on top of us. But that's because even big asteroids are really, really small for the most part. But a planet (or star) massive enough to already be affecting us (causing global warming) from the outer reaches of the solar system? That would be really, really big. It defies any kind if logic to suggest that thousands of astronomers across the planet wouldn't have noticed it by now. Even if they couldn't see it directly (because they're not at the south pole) its effects on the rest of the objects in the solar system would be readily apparent by now.
 
I love all this Nibiru stuff.

You know it was invented by some crazy bitch in 2000, it's not even historical. There's nothing from before that time that even mentions this horseshit, it's just been perpetuated and retconned by various conspiracy nuts on the Internet since that time.

She claims she was told about the approach of 'Nibiru' by Zeta Reticulians (yeah, those guys with the gray faces and the big eyes) via paranormal means, and was totally convinced by them that the world was going to end in May 2000.

Oh wait, it didn't.

So then she revised it to 2003.

Oh well, still no Nibiru...

So now it's 2010 or 2012 (which just happens to match up with this stupid-ass "Mayan calendar" nonsense that isn't even significant, please see here for an explanation).

Excuse me if I'm not worried.

Just to put some of the claims about Nibiru in to context:

  • Nibiru and/or a tenth planet IS NOT talked about in ancient texts. Zechariah Sitchin MADE THIS UP.
  • There is no indication astronomically of an object in our Solar system this size, or indeed any size. Every single planet discovered has been discovered by telescopes with less resolving power than what you can buy in a shop thanks to modern precision lens technology. Additionally, the maths shows no perturbations in any of the planets' orbits or wobble of the Sun to indicate an object of this size.
  • There are not more earthquakes than normal, please read the Earthquake myths page here if you want to know more. They are better reported by the media than they used to be, which can lead us to believe there are more, but the number of quakes of different magnitudes has remained unchanged since we started recording them. It's just that before, we might've ignored a magnitude 5.5 earthquake in China, but now, we have Wikipedia.
  • Likewise, there hasn't been an increase in 'freak weather'.
  • BROWN DWARFS emit significant amounts of EM radiation, you know like light, and heat. If 'Nemesis' existed and was in our back yard, we could easily detect it. They are indeed old stars at the end of their life, but they're not dead balls of rock.

I could go on.

But honestly it's not worth my time.

Please, by all means go and build your bomb shelter and stay in there if you wish.
 
I love all this Nibiru stuff.

You know it was invented by some crazy bitch in 2000, it's not even historical. There's nothing from before that time that even mentions this horseshit, it's just been perpetuated and retconned by various conspiracy nuts on the Internet since that time.

She claims she was told about the approach of 'Nibiru' by Zeta Reticulians (yeah, those guys with the gray faces and the big eyes) via paranormal means, and was totally convinced by them that the world was going to end in May 2000.

Oh wait, it didn't.

So then she revised it to 2003.

Oh well, still no Nibiru...

So now it's 2010 or 2012 (which just happens to match up with this stupid-ass "Mayan calendar" nonsense that isn't even significant, please see here for an explanation).

Excuse me if I'm not worried.

Just to put some of the claims about Nibiru in to context:

  • Nibiru and/or a tenth planet IS NOT talked about in ancient texts. Zechariah Sitchin MADE THIS UP.
  • There is no indication astronomically of an object in our Solar system this size, or indeed any size. Every single planet discovered has been discovered by telescopes with less resolving power than what you can buy in a shop thanks to modern precision lens technology. Additionally, the maths shows no perturbations in any of the planets' orbits or wobble of the Sun to indicate an object of this size.
  • There are not more earthquakes than normal, please read the Earthquake myths page here if you want to know more. They are better reported by the media than they used to be, which can lead us to believe there are more, but the number of quakes of different magnitudes has remained unchanged since we started recording them. It's just that before, we might've ignored a magnitude 5.5 earthquake in China, but now, we have Wikipedia.
  • Likewise, there hasn't been an increase in 'freak weather'.
  • BROWN DWARFS emit significant amounts of EM radiation, you know like light, and heat. If 'Nemesis' existed and was in our back yard, we could easily detect it. They are indeed old stars at the end of their life, but they're not dead balls of rock.

I could go on.

But honestly it's not worth my time.

Please, by all means go and build your bomb shelter and stay in there if you wish.
I guess this is the result of "doing research," as Tachyon Shield suggested. :lol:
 
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all. None of that is evidence, but there is plenty of other evidence proving it's there and cataclysms are coming, cataclysms that come around in cycles. You have to sift through the false stuff to find the real evidence.

When you research something don't just look for evidence against something and then leave it at that because you'll always find something or other no matter what the subject, you should search for the evidence in favour as well. That kind of evidence is there, there's plenty of it but hard to find because everyone who knows of the subject of Nibiru come out with bullshit. Just go on youtube and you'll see people are putting up bullshit videos saying they've got photos of Nibiru. You sift through the rubbish and find the truth.
 
I'm just sad that we won't get to see any of Tachyon's great inventions.

I guess that with this new found panic, he has a good excuse for not creating prototypes and trying out his ideas.

Just to let you know, this will be my last post in this thread. My closing remarks to Tachyon are:

Know that trial-and-error, and learning from one's mistakes, are not marks of failure. On the contrary, they can be marks of progress, and all that is required is that you accept it as such. :)
 
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.

But basically all the Niburu-nonsense is made up by or connected to Zechariah Sitchin's imagination...

I still don't know where you get your certainty from.
 
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all. None of that is evidence, but there is plenty of other evidence proving it's there and cataclysms are coming, cataclysms that come around in cycles. You have to sift through the false stuff to find the real evidence.

When you research something don't just look for evidence against something and then leave it at that because you'll always find something or other no matter what the subject, you should search for the evidence in favour as well. That kind of evidence is there, there's plenty of it but hard to find because everyone who knows of the subject of Nibiru come out with bullshit. Just go on youtube and you'll see people are putting up bullshit videos saying they've got photos of Nibiru. You sift through the rubbish and find the truth.
Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?

And why are you so opposed to providing the evidence behind your "truth"?
 
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.

But basically all the Niburu-nonsense is made up by or connected to Zechariah Sitchin's imagination...

I still don't know where you get your certainty from.

See, you believe the whole Nibiru thing is connected only to Sitchin, it isn't and you'd know that if you bothered to find out.
I'm not bothered if you're not going to research the subject in more depth and just think Nibiru is all to do with Sitchin. Your choice.

Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?

And why are you so opposed to providing the evidence behind your "truth"?

The evidence is all over the place and there's also a lot of shit out there, you've got to research yourself to find the relevant evidence. I've seen all the evidence in question but it's something you come across and find on your own. I can't direct you to specific material because it's all over the place and some of the real evidence is actually buried in the shit and you've got to pick it out.
I could direct you to something with the evidence and you'll read some of the shit and immediately dismiss it instead of studying it and finding the relevant evidence.

If I do your math for you then you're not going to learn how to do an equation. Do you get me?
If i'm going to teach you to ride a bike I don't ride the bike for you.
 
Look, if the evidence is "all over the place", just post a couple of links. It'll stop the naysayers and give them something to ficus on.

All the stuff I've seen so far is either dismissive/mocking, or the batshit crazy stuff. Nothing in between. It won't kill you to post links to what you consider "true" sources.
 
That's the research of ignorance. I already said not to listen to those people who claim to speak with aliens or other beings and I said not to even consider any of Zacharia Sitchins (sp?) work at all.

But basically all the Niburu-nonsense is made up by or connected to Zechariah Sitchin's imagination...

I still don't know where you get your certainty from.

See, you believe the whole Nibiru thing is connected only to Sitchin, it isn't and you'd know that if you bothered to find out.
I'm not bothered if you're not going to research the subject in more depth and just think Nibiru is all to do with Sitchin. Your choice.

Not to sound like a jackass here, but why the hell would anyone put that much effort into researching something they're debating on a Star Trek message board?

And why are you so opposed to providing the evidence behind your "truth"?

The evidence is all over the place and there's also a lot of shit out there, you've got to research yourself to find the relevant evidence. I've seen all the evidence in question but it's something you come across and find on your own. I can't direct you to specific material because it's all over the place and some of the real evidence is actually buried in the shit and you've got to pick it out.
I could direct you to something with the evidence and you'll read some of the shit and immediately dismiss it instead of studying it and finding the relevant evidence.

If I do your math for you then you're not going to learn how to do an equation. Do you get me?
If i'm going to teach you to ride a bike I don't ride the bike for you.
I guess I didn't realize I was studying for a Nibiru exam.

I've never seen anyone do such a fine job of being vague and evasive.
 
Wait a second...this all reminds me of something...

HC1080UB_5thElement_multipass_Lg.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top