Soran wasn't human, he was an El-Aurian.
Whoops, my bad.
But before anyone else says it, Khan, being an Augment, is still human

Soran wasn't human, he was an El-Aurian.
And, on my scorecard, the Federation, with all of its problems, is a far ideal society than the one offered in 23rd century Klingon, or 24th century Romulans. If not, then why don't we just let the Romulans take us over?
Rob
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense. By this same argument, Nazi Germany was a "far ideal society" than the Allies, since they didn't "just let the Allies take them over". Saddam's Iraq and the Taliban's Afghanistan were "far ideal societies" than the US, and so on. The Federation fighting for its own survival has nothing to do with how ideal it is.
Yes it does. You are being far to 'elitist' here. The Federation, as depicted in the shows and movies, are the good guys. It doesn't have to be made more complicated than that. From TROUBLES WITH TRIBBLES to BALANCE OF TERROR to SACRAFICE OF ANGELS, the Federation is doing this for a good cause.
Rob
Rob
Where?Heck, we DID have female Captains in TOS even before ENT showed us a female captain in the 22nd century.
...The Borg have assimilated MILLIONS...
Well, I know. But Star Trek IV isn't exactly The Original Series.The Captain of the Saratoga in Trek IV was a woman.
So then why do Spock and Q both harp on about Human barbarism, when the other races are so much worse?
Yeah, but what about Q's "tests" of humanity? He keeps putting humans through their "trial" and ultimately puts Picard through a test wherein if he fails all life in the Universe would ultimately cease to exist (All Good Things).
So why did he test humanity this way to see if they deserved to exist, yet he never tested the Klingons or Romulans or Cardassians in similar ways? Surely if humans are "barbarians" then they must be too, and constantly tested as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.