Rory will be sent back in time, and the Doctor and Amy find his gravestone. Thus, Rorys death is a set point and cant be altered, but the Doctor CAN deliver the wife to her husband, and let them live life together.
Neither. It's a Futurama episode from season four and ends thusly:Is that a story about Pre-Historic Dogs or Trees?^ Moffat is going to totally rip off Jurassic Bark.![]()
Fair enough. I look forward to it nonetheless (but I still have a ways to because my next story is The Next Life, the final Divergent Universe story).It was the first story I listened to ever, so I had no idea what was happening.
I'm sorry.
But I assure you that what I said is the tip of an unbelievably huge iceberg.
The Ponds' death has been so heavily foreshadowed that I think it's a safe bet that nothing will happen to them. The sudden introduction of Brian Williams, on the other hands, reminds me of the old Tom Fontana technique, a.k.a. "make the viewers care about a character right before you kill him". That's why I think that the dad buys it, which leads the Ponds to leave the Doctor.
Or it wouldn't. There's really no way to have an informed opinion about it now.That would be quite stupid.
Well, seeing as the story is set in New York, the most satisfying result IMO would be to have them zapped back in time to 1969. They then meet and adopt their own daughter, newly regenerated, before relocating back to Leadworth under false names. They then get a chance to raise her properly, eventually passing from old age after a long and happy life together.
Interestingly, though, it would probably mean River being around in the present-day NuWhoniverse and with eleven regenerations left. And there's that whole Silence thing too.Thus removing River with a Paradox.
I completely agree. Fontana was very good at this technique, especially on Oz.The Ponds' death has been so heavily foreshadowed that I think it's a safe bet that nothing will happen to them. The sudden introduction of Brian Williams, on the other hands, reminds me of the old Tom Fontana technique, a.k.a. "make the viewers care about a character right before you kill him". That's why I think that the dad buys it, which leads the Ponds to leave the Doctor.
I completely agree. Fontana was very good at this technique, especially on Oz.The Ponds' death has been so heavily foreshadowed that I think it's a safe bet that nothing will happen to them. The sudden introduction of Brian Williams, on the other hands, reminds me of the old Tom Fontana technique, a.k.a. "make the viewers care about a character right before you kill him". That's why I think that the dad buys it, which leads the Ponds to leave the Doctor.
He was so good at it that after a couple of seasons, we were trained to dread the quieter, nicer moments, because of the tragedy that would invariably follow.I completely agree. Fontana was very good at this technique, especially on Oz.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.