How we deal with death

Discussion in 'Trek Literature' started by Leaf, Mar 2, 2009.

  1. Brefugee

    Brefugee No longer living the Irish dream. Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    Seeing you quote that I'm amazed no one had already done so, me, even though it's from my favourite Trek film, I clean forgot about it.
     
  2. Praetor

    Praetor Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Location:
    NC
    I was as shocked as you were! :eek:

    I also wanted to add, I see the end Q scene with Janeway much as was attempted with the Nexus and Kirk in 'Generations' - a coda of sorts that in some ways makes the character 'immortal' in-universe, sending them off to a kind of Valhalla if you will. Janeway's dead but drinking coffee with Lady Q as a 'ghost,' and Kirk's dead but still chopping wood with Antonia in the Nexus as a 'ghost.'
     
  3. Newspaper Taxi

    Newspaper Taxi Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Newspaper Taxi
    Here's another way to look at things: How many impossible scenarios have Star Trek characters survived?
     
  4. KRAD

    KRAD Keith R.A. DeCandido Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 1999
    Location:
    New York City
    One of the reasons why we did Wildfire in S.C.E. was precisely because death had become so devalued in Star Trek. I wanted to show that death isn't a minor condition that you eventually recover from, and I wanted to show the characters actually dealing with the consequences.

    (Also: I wanted, for once, a character who goes on a suicide mission to actually, y'know, die....)

    Pretty much every story told after Wildfire had at least some leftover trauma from the events of that story, because that's how it generally works.
     
  5. Therin of Andor

    Therin of Andor Admiral Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
    TOS was set in the 23rd century and commented on contemporary issues of our century, particularly the 60s, the time it was being produced. TAS commented on contemporary issues of the 70s. TNG was set in the 24th century but commented on contemporary issues of the 80s. DS9, VOY and ENT's stories reflected the early 21st century.

    If you see that recent ST series and novels have spent too much time on "doom and gloom", that is perhaps because the early 21st century isn't anywhere near as rosy as people would like it to be, and even ST finds it hard to tackle the big issues. However, Lynx, since you readily admit to having a very narrow focus on what you find to be acceptable as good ST (ie. episodes and novels with Kes in them), most ST stories are not going to be satisfying to you, even if all sweetness and light.

    A recent common theme of ST novels seems to be that (even when times get very tough), comradeship, loyalty, the importance of clear communication, and the setting lofty goals in exploration and information exchange, are still important in resolving dilemmas. How is that not positive?
     
  6. ClayinCA

    ClayinCA Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    California
    'Cause Janeway's dead, apparently.... :p
     
  7. Dayton Ward

    Dayton Ward Word Pusher Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2000
    ^But they saved her brain!!!!
     
  8. LutherSloan

    LutherSloan Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Location:
    Doing the Federation's dirty work
    Noooooooooooooooooo
     
  9. kimc

    kimc Coffee Mod Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    ^ "Final Destiny" = The "Spock's Brain" of Trek Lit. :D
     
  10. Thrawn

    Thrawn Rear Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    I must be missing something, because I'm unaware of any Trek Lit called "Final Destiny". :confused:
     
  11. Geoff Thorne

    Geoff Thorne Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Location:
    Lost Angles
    I spent a good deal of time on death and the wake it leaves in SWORD OF DAMOCLES and CLB and M & M did as well in their TITAN works.

    I would never ever kill a character, even one I don't personally like well, for the sake of a stunt or plot device. Every character has fans.

    In fact one of the main themes of SoD was the repercussions felt after the death of a loved one.

    and, I agree: WILDFIRE was freaking heartbreaking.
     
  12. Rush Limborg

    Rush Limborg Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Location:
    The EIB Network
    Brain, and brain....

    WHAT THE :censored: IS BRAIN???
     
  13. kissthestar

    kissthestar Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Her brain? I can think of other bits that might have merited a save.
     
  14. kissthestar

    kissthestar Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Also, will there be a novel called Kate's Brain, do you suppose?
     
  15. Dayton Ward

    Dayton Ward Word Pusher Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    May 22, 2000
    ^ I like the way you think. :cool:
     
  16. Jbarney

    Jbarney Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Location:
    Between 2273-2278

    I've said it before....Wildfire is one of the best Star Trek stories ever. It was sad to see the da Vinci experience what it did, but it made for a very memorable story.
     
  17. Gotham Central

    Gotham Central Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 15, 2001
    Location:
    Chicago, IL

    Bravo :techman:
     
  18. Gotham Central

    Gotham Central Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 15, 2001
    Location:
    Chicago, IL

    You keep saying "unnecssary character destruction"....what the hell does that mean? Who gets to decide when death is "necessary?"

    Your problem seems to be that you don't like change. You obviously have issues with the notion that these fictional characters are treated as mortals. I don't care how much of a hopey happy future you have....come what may, that which is mortal MUST DIE. Unless you are suggesting that the Q grant everyone immortality, its seems perfectly reasonable for characters to die. Death is a part of life. Only The Sisko has the potential of being immortal. Everyone else, no matter how long lived should die at some point.

    One of the problems that I have long had with Star Trek is that it is really stingy with death. People are so used to heroes getting out of impossible situations that they forget that the situations as depicted are dangerous. In the real world, heroic figues die doing heroic things. In my opinon Star Trek needs to get into the habit of reminding people that being in Starfleet is dangerous. Some times people don't come back. I think that this is one areaa where the books have definately improved over the TV series.
     
  19. Gotham Central

    Gotham Central Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 15, 2001
    Location:
    Chicago, IL

    Yeah, but they just stuck it in a jar and put in a shelf next to all the others. I think that someone is collecting them :lol:

    I bet they figure that it will fetch a good price on Ferengi market
     
  20. Brit

    Brit Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Location:
    Texas
    All that is very nice, but just don't do it to my favorite character. Because I don't want to deal with death, I've been there done that in rela life and it's not pleasent and not what I want to do for pleasure.

    Brit