But DS9 did those things on its own terms. The sexy babes wore standard uniforms (most of the time). The explosions made sense in the context of the story. They went all-in with TNG characters Miles and Worf. And they left the Borg to Voyager.
The difference is that DS9 did it better. OK, they had sexy babes, nothing wrong with that. But they didn't over-do it or exaggerate it as it was with one character in Voyager's later season. As for ENT, I'll get back to that.
Explosions and effects can be OK if they are contributing to the story. With Braga in charge of Voyager, it became too much.
They brought in TNG characters like Miles and Worf to DS9 and that was done in a good way. Of course they knew that TNG characters would be appreciated in DS9 and nothing wrong with that. Tere were also logical reasons that TNG characters should show up on DS9, I mean The Federation, Starfleet and everything.
But on Voyager? In the Delta Quadrant?
Actually, it was OK to see Barclay in
Projections and
Riker in Death Wish and i must admit that they never over-did it in Voyager. But it was a lot of desperate thinking among those in charge of Voyager. Instead of pulling up items from TNG in some sort of panicking, they should have built up something unique with Voyager which actually had a wonderful premise for that.
When it comes to The Borg, keeping them out of the DS9 story was one of the best thing those in charge did.
The Borg were finished after
Best Of Both Worlds and the humanization of The Borg which started with Hugh an continued with The Borg Queen and maybe Seven. At that point The Borg had lost everything which made them interesting. In fact, both the cardassians and The Dominion were far more interesting and in some ways even more scary than The Borg after
Best Of Both Worlds.
As for Voyager... like I said, I find it infuriating that so many of its flaws could have been corrected so easily. But I still enjoy watching it (some episodes more than others).
I can agree on that. I still like the characters. They were great!
And I like the first three seasons of the series. But I can't help thinking what the series could have become with better writers and producers.
It reminds me a bit of NCIS New Orleans which was great in the first seasons but turned into a total mess due to certain producers who kicked out actresses and deleted their characters for "not being ****able enough, then adding bad characters and turning the whole show into a mess with the main character constantly seing hallucinations, not to mention ridiculous "enemies" and overall bad story telling.
I must admit that Voyager, despite for one episode, never became that bad.
As for Enterprise, I think that it squandered its premise far worse than Voyager did: T'Pol's outfit was ludicrous, given that Vulcans normally wear loose-fitting robelike garments. Including transporters and 24th century weapons was just dumb. And don't get me started on the temporal cold war.
"Enterprise" was wrong from the start. A retro series which looked more like a spin-off to any other SF-series than the TOS it was supposed to resemble. Add to that bad characters and a constanly messing-up of established Star Trek history.
And T'Pol........I must admit that she made me see Seven in a different way that i had done from the start. Seven did at least have some quality and was played by a great actress. T'Pol was nothing of that.