Whereas Worf and Quark and Neelix and Phlox and Saru [and Bortus] are all made up according to the exact same aesthetic or style with only slight variations
I disagree. The bumpy foreheads could get a bit repetitive, but particularly the Ferengi, the Talaxians and...uh...Saru's people (sorry don't wtch enough DISC) look fairly distinctive. I'd also call the Cardassians distinctive, as were the Bolians, the Benzites, the Jem'Hadar, the Rat and Cobra aliens from Lonely Among Us, the Binar, that four-armed piano player Riker talked to when he looked for Picard, or the many, many very distinctive looking background Aliens on DS9 (Dabbo girl with jewels glued to her Parasaurolophus horn, those aliens with "trunks" hanging from the back of their head, Morn...)
I do wish however that they would have employed more non-human skin and hair colours, but well.. Particularly with the Bajorans. While I like their culture and storylines and Kira is one of my favourite Star Trek character, their nose ridges are just lazy (but they apparently had to keep Ro Laren "pretty" for the heterosexual male audience

) And the Betazoids (who, for the same reason just got black contact lenses)
And well, same could be said about the TOS aliens, a lot of them were just people painted a funny colour or had strange wigs. Stuff like the Gorn or that Yeti-creature suits wouldn't have worked anymore in the 80s, technology wasn't there yet to GCI them and more realistic costumes (I'm talking Star Wars quality) might have been to expensive.
However what I *really* don't understand is how the TNG Andorian makeup could have ended up looking THAT bad when they were one of the better make-up jobs in TOS, a show 20 year older...