In fact, it's likely that Romulus represented only a small portion of the Romulan population.
Why would that be likely?
In fact, it's likely that Romulus represented only a small portion of the Romulan population.
Why would that be likely?
Well colonies are usually small, expensive and not effective in the long run. I'd venture to say their home planet had the absolute majority of people. Maybe colonies scattered around with a couple of hundred thousand people at most.
Except that Romulus is not a homeworld, it's a colony itself.
Besides, the USA was initially made of colonies. Colonies grow and they often surpass the countries that spawned them. I don't know where you get this idea that colonies remain small.
Theres absolutely nothing implying that the Romulans are still on Vulcan. To call Romulus a colony is like calling the US a colony. For all intents and purposes Romulus is the Romulan homeworld.
Before the US got its independance the total population wasnt much more than 2 million. It wasn't until the huge influx of immigrants to the new country of USA from many OTHER countries that the population grew in significant numbers
Any starfaring race would be ridiculously inept to have its civilisation and survival tied to one world. Just for diversity of resources and freedom to expand, major colonisation efforts would be required.
Any starfaring race would be ridiculously inept to have its civilisation and survival tied to one world. Just for diversity of resources and freedom to expand, major colonisation efforts would be required.
I'd expect Earth to have millions of humans resident elsewhere by the time of TOS and it hardly stands to reason that the expansionist Klingons and Romulans would be any different.
Why would that be likely?
Precisely.
Whether they were still up for peace, or became even more isolationist, it doesn't matter. There would be plenty of Romulans left and the story potential would be high.
Of course we're still theoretical.![]()
We didn't really know whether Vulcan had an empire (Vulcania?) until the 2009 movie. In retrospect, it's a good thing there never was an unambiguous reference to a Vulcan colony world - the closest thing is the Vulcanis Lunar Colony, birthplace of Tuvok, quite possibly located on Earth's own Luna...
Romulans are Vulcans, though. Sticking to a single planet, even against reason (say, when said planet is a hellhole fundamentally unsuited for Vulcanoid life, such as Vulcan herself), might be deeply ingrained in the Vulcanoid psyche or biology - even if the desire to name every one of those single planets a Galactic Empire of Multiversal Might is in there, too.
Timo Saloniemi
Even so, I'd expect most of the main Federation planets to have thousands of Vulcans resident or visiting, hundreds on each foreign planet with an embassy or trade delegation, thousands on Vulcan ships, perhaps tens or hundreds of thousands on colonies.True, but the Vulcans didn't have an empire like the Romulans. The destruction of Vulcan would be more devastating to the Vulcan population than the destruction of Romulus.
Even so, I'd expect most of the main Federation planets to have thousands of Vulcans resident or visiting, hundreds on each foreign planet with an embassy or trade delegation, thousands on Vulcan ships, perhaps tens or hundreds of thousands on colonies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.