I will bet good internet currency Discovery goes first given it's production costs.
Discovery's first season is already paid for thanks to international distribution deals. According to CBS.
I will bet good internet currency Discovery goes first given it's production costs.
You can find every opinion on the Internet. Honestly, the better metric will be the response when it airs, not the gasbagging (to borrow a radio term) that can run rampant with reckless speculation.Funny thing is that I shared the trailer on a couple of other forums, and it got nothing but positive responses. Suppose it depends on where you go.
However, I saw a Youtube speculating that Netflix is unhappy with the final product, wondering how it is so different from what it was pitched, and draws little connection to the rest of the Trek in it's libraries.
You lost me right there.........However, I saw a Youtube speculating ...........
However, I saw a Youtube speculating that Netflix is unhappy with the final product, wondering how it is so different from what it was pitched, and draws little connection to the rest of the Trek in it's libraries.
Season one should be over by now, if it had started in January like they told us it was supposed to have.
Save yourself a click............No it is not a going to be replaced by a mythical show.Oh, well...
You want Star Trek to be a sitcom?
I mean, sure, Orville might be funny, or it might bomb. I'm not sure why people think it will be good just because it looks like the nineties Star Trek it is deliberately mocking.
It's funny, I don't remember Trekkies ever being excited for a new show. They were all never going to be as good as what we already had. How could a bald English guy replace Kirk?
Reckless speculation is reckless.Key word is speculation. Any proof or evidence other then fsns don't like the look so Netflix must not like it either?
That's a fair point. I'm not sure if it fairly represents the actual tone of the whole series, or if it's just a trailer emphasising the action and dark elements of what looks like mainly the pilot episode.I wish the new Star Trek series would be in the middle between The Orville and DIS tone wise. The Orville is obviously a comedy series and looks so far entertaining to me, but for a real Star Trek series a bit more seriousness would be good. DIS though just seems to go in a too dark direction for my taste, lacking fun and humour completely.
Oh, well...
Oh no! A YouTube video made by a crazy crank who has been spouting nonsense for years! Clearly Trek is doomed.
They're missing the point. Take a look at the videos in my sig, if any of it mattered as much as they like to think, Trek's already broken beyond repair.
SG:U IMO was way better that SG:A - so yeah, not an issue if that's the case.Given what we have been shown so far I have a very distinct feeling that Star Trek Discovery will be the Stargate Universe of the Star Trek series.![]()
There are more 'Family Guy'/Seth McFarlane fans then Star Trek fans (and yes, that DOES have a lot to do with that.)You mean no evidence other then the Orville trailer which compared to Discovery's 1.9 million views while sitting at 11,200 likes and 6,200 dislikes has 2.9 million views and is sitting at 22,250 likes and 3,750 dislikes?![]()
Clickbait bullshit that I managed to sit 37 seconds through before moving back to reality.Save yourself a click............No it is not a going to be replaced by a mythical show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.