• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How long before "The Man Trap" did McCoy know Kirk?

Trying to nail down months for each episodes has been interesting.
For Stardate to Calendar Date conversion, I base almost everything on Thanksgiving around Stardate 1535 and 1000 Stardates in one Earth year or about 365.25 days (since both the UFP and Starfleet Headquarters are on Earth). This puts X000 on May 11 and Christmas, 12/25 on X623.

I speculate that for WNMHGB, they were still using the United Earth Stardate which X000 is tied to the Calendar Date Jan.1 (makes sense since Starfleet is still under UESPA and not UFP ;)). WNMHGB's tombstone C. 1277.1 - 1313.7 is April 10 thru April 23, and the episode started on 1312.4 or April 22. This scenario would have Kirk taking over the Enterprise from Pike probably at the last Starfleet outpost nearest the Galactic edge. Kirk would be taking over Pike's last mission to map outside the Galaxy. If so, there is a chance that Kirk was promoted to Captain before his lengthly space trip to the Enterprise, and maybe even just before his birthday (March 22, for example). Kirk conducts the mission to map outside the Galaxy. He then goes back to a Starbase for repairs/refit and re-provisioning. Within 4 months or 1 year and 4 months later, Kirk's 5YM is underway. (I use a 15 month refit with a launch of 8/11/2266). Also within those 4 months (or 1 year and 4 months), Starfleet switched over the Federation Stardate system, changed uniforms, and McCoy is on Capella Four for a few months.

Additionally, on Stardate 1329.1, Mudd's Women is the first episode ~Sept. 10. YMMV (a lot!) :)
 
Last edited:
Interesting! I started in a somewhat similar place, with "Charlie X" placed around Thanksgiving and assuming that 1000 stardate units equals one year. From there, I placed the episodes of my "first year" of the 5YM (the ones that began with 1XXX) at one month intervals throughout 2265. This gave me the start of the 5YM in April, WNMHGB in May, "The Corbomite Maneuver" in June, and so on. I arrived at April 29, 2265 as the day that Kirk assumed command of the Enterprise based upon the statement in "The Menagerie" that Spock served with Pike for 11 years, 4 months, and 5 days. D.C. Fontana's novel Vulcan's Glory, the story of Spock's first mission on the Enterprise, begins in "late December." Adding 11 years, 4 months, and 5 days to December 24th, 2253 gave me April 29th, 2265 for the Kirk becoming Captain. (This also has the benefit of jibing with McCoy's comment that his daughter Joanna is "graduating college soon" in "The First Mission" story in DC Comics' Star Trek Annual #1.)

From there, I chose a couple of dates as tributes to the real Trek. I gave WNMHGB the time span of May 24th - June 2nd, based upon the shooting dates of "The Corbomite Maneuver," the first regular episode. Since "The Man Trap" was placed in September, I assigned it to September 8th, the date it served as Star Trek's premiere episode in 1966. I've done a few other things like that, like putting "A Piece of the Action" in February because of the St. Valentine's Day Massacre, and setting "Our Man Bashir" on October 5th, the date of Dr. No's premiere. It makes it more fun for me.

But the most helpful thing in assigning specific months for me was deciding on an academic year for Starfleet Academy (based on the academic year at the Naval Academy) and giving the main characters specific birthdays (usually based on their actor's birthdays). So if, say, Wesley Crusher says that he's turning 16 next month, that means that the episode in question would take place in June. And if Riker says that he was seven months out of the Academy at the time of the Pegasus mutiny, that would place it in January. Stuff like character pregnancies helped me place surrounding episodes from there.

I'm not done yet, but I'm having fun with it so far! :)
 
I'm not done yet, but I'm having fun with it so far! :)
That's my last and most important rule in my Stardate Rules:
  1. 1000 stardates = one Earth year or 365.25 days or 8766 hours; or ~2.74 stardates = 1 day;
  2. Scene or actor delivered stardates are actual stardates of the event and cannot be changed;
  3. Log entries are always spoken in the present tense narrative;
  4. "Log" entries can be minutes, hours, days, weeks, months after actual events as-recorded in the ship's records during the episode or as-edited in the mission report after the event;
  5. I try to assume the least amount of lapsed time of log entries (report while still fresh in memory) but you can also assume any length of time prior to the inserted log stardates, even several months on rare occasion.
  6. It is better to sort the episodes by finish stardates, but this is only a minor issue versus start stardates;
  7. Episode durations and time between episodes must be estimated based on episode dialog or action; as a rule of thumb, one to two weeks (20-40 stardates) should be allowed between episodes, but only a day or two is sufficient to travel several star systems if they are in a hurry like answering a distress call (speed of plot can be very fast);
  8. Several unknown stardate episodes must be estimated; as a rule of thumb, try to stick to production order if possible, i.e. put episode 54 as close to 53 or 55 as possible;
  9. I put in additional time to complete the unaired parts of each mission (x days scanning before episode, deliver x to y after episode) or for repairs, set changes and starbase visits; serious ship repairs can take one or two weeks; upgrades maybe longer.
  10. If there is no explanation for something that doesn't fit, assume it is a script error and move along. (This actually occurs with five episodes: TCOTK; TGOT; TDY; ATCSL; SB which I rule all have script errors.)
  11. Have fun is the most important rule.
 
Weighing in on this late: I always figured Kirk knew McCoy from a previous assignment and requested him as Chief Medical Officer as soon as he got the chance to. I'll go so far as to say I think Kirk might've known McCoy as many as 11 years before TOS. McCoy probably knew Kirk during a time when he was more like Bailey (or at least enough like him). That's why he could tell Kirk maybe he saw something in Bailey that reminded him of himself. It's safe to say Kirk probably became a Lieutenant fast. So he wouldn't see a problem with promoting Bailey equally as fast.

I think Kirk inherited Pike's crew when he first took command, so it wasn't much of his own crew that he himself put together at first. In addition to Spock, I think Sulu and Scotty served under Pike. McCoy and Uhura were people that Kirk brought aboard.

For that matter: I think Piper, Kelso, and Alden served under Pike toward the end of his command. Mitchell was brought on by Kirk.
 
Last edited:
Weighing in on this late: I always figured Kirk knew McCoy from a previous assignment and requested him as Chief Medical Officer as soon as he got the chance to. I'll go so far as to say I think Kirk might've known McCoy as many as 11 years before TOS. McCoy probably knew Kirk during a time when he was more like Bailey (or at least enough like him). That's why he could tell Kirk maybe he saw something in Bailey that reminded him of himself. It's safe to say Kirk probably became a Lieutenant fast. So he wouldn't see a problem with promoting Bailey equally as fast.

I think Kirk inherited Pike's crew when he first took command, so it wasn't much of his own crew that he himself put together at first. In addition to Spock, I think Sulu and Scotty served under Pike. McCoy and Uhura were people that Kirk brought aboard.

For that matter: I think Piper, Kelso, and Alden served under Pike toward the end of his command. Mitchell was brought on by Kirk.

SPOCK: Our subject is not Gary Mitchell. Our concern is, rather, what he is mutating into.
DEHNER: I know those from your planet aren't suppose to have feelings like we do, Mister Spock, but to talk that way about a man you've worked next to for years is worse than

So apparently Spock and Mitchell worked closely together for at least two years before "Where No Man Has Gone Before". And presumably Spock never served off of the Enterprise for any long periods of time since several years before Mitchell became a Star fleet officer.

So if Kirk brought Mitchell to the Enterprise when he took command of the Enteprise tht should have been at least two years before "Where No Man Has Gone Before".

And I think that many people don't think Kirk could have been incommand of the Etnerprise that long before "Where No Man Has Gone Before".
 
And I think that many people don't think Kirk could have been incommand of the Etnerprise that long before "Where No Man Has Gone Before".
Good point; fortuitous that Kirk's good friend was already the helmsman under Pike, and for Sulu for the job opening. :whistle:
 
We still don't know if Jim's request for having Gary aboard his first command got granted, but accepting that Mitchell and Spock were aboard the Enterprise together, rather than elsewhere together, does limit our interpretations.

If Kirk did get his wish, it must have been aboard some other ship, and before Mitchell joined Pike's team, and the Enterprise thus isn't Kirk's first command.

If he didn't, well, Gary is with him on the Enterprise, so Jim's first command must have been some other ship. Otherwise we would have to assume Kirk would need to file a special request not to have Mitchell transferred away from the Enterprise when Kirk took over. A somewhat odd requirement, unless Gary himself was somehow hell-bent on leaving (perhaps Kirk made his request to Mitchell directly?). And an odd wording for Kirk to describe this.

A good reason to think the Enterprise wasn't Kirk's first command, then...

Timo Saloniemi
 
We still don't know if Jim's request for having Gary aboard his first command got granted, but accepting that Mitchell and Spock were aboard the Enterprise together, rather than elsewhere together, does limit our interpretations.

If Kirk did get his wish, it must have been aboard some other ship, and before Mitchell joined Pike's team, and the Enterprise thus isn't Kirk's first command.

If he didn't, well, Gary is with him on the Enterprise, so Jim's first command must have been some other ship. Otherwise we would have to assume Kirk would need to file a special request not to have Mitchell transferred away from the Enterprise when Kirk took over. A somewhat odd requirement, unless Gary himself was somehow hell-bent on leaving (perhaps Kirk made his request to Mitchell directly?). And an odd wording for Kirk to describe this.

A good reason to think the Enterprise wasn't Kirk's first command, then...

Timo Saloniemi

The novel "The Captain's Oath" by Christopher Bennett is a story about Kirk's 'first command' and he goes with the idea that he had a command before the Enterprise.

I'll admit, I was one of those fans that just thought the Enterprise was his first command, but listening closely to Dr. Dehner's dialogue, one way to interpret it is he had one before the Enterprise.

And Christopher had made a good point, would they really have given command to one of the 12 most advanced ships in Starfleet to a brand new captain? It'd probably make sense that they'd want their captains of those 12 ships to have some prior command experience.
 
I think Kirk inherited Pike's crew when he first took command, so it wasn't much of his own crew that he himself put together at first. In addition to Spock, I think Sulu and Scotty served under Pike. McCoy and Uhura were people that Kirk brought aboard.

For that matter: I think Piper, Kelso, and Alden served under Pike toward the end of his command. Mitchell was brought on by Kirk.
Yeah, a little while ago I came up with the idea that Mitchell might've served under Pike during the tail end of Pike's tenure. That's why he was unavailable when Kirk requested him for his first command (the Saladin in my mind) and how Mitchell has served next to Mr. Spock "for years" by the time of WNMHGB. I personally like the idea that at that particular point in time, Mitchell knew Kirk and Spock better than either one of them knew each other.
 
I think Kirk wanted Mitchell on his first command but Mitchell probably just got his rank and position on the Enterprise, so a lateral move to a lower-profile ship would've been seen as a step down. So the situation just wouldn't have worked out.

So Kirk took it as a challenge. He did the best he could with his first command so he'd impress Starfleet enough so that they'd give him a Constitution Class Starship. Not necessarily the Enterprise, but a ship like it in general. He made it a goal. Then he got lucky because not too long after, as fate would have it, there was an opening for Captain of the Enterprise.
 
And Christopher had made a good point, would they really have given command to one of the 12 most advanced ships in Starfleet to a brand new captain? It'd probably make sense that they'd want their captains of those 12 ships to have some prior command experience.

Well, that in turn involves the assumption that Kirk's ship was among a group of very special ones. And not special in the Ralph Wiggum sense, either.

Yet most Trek goes strongly against this suggestion.

- Kirk's ride isn't modern - she's ancient, even if well maintained. She looks ancient now that we have assuredly ancient ships to compare with; she also has a sordid history of extreme refits befitting an aging vessel.
- While being a starship skipper is a big deal, Kirk isn't one out of twelve. He is one out of thousands active at the time. This is fully in line with Commodore Stone's "one in a million" line, FWIW, and with the greater Trek context of there having to exist thousands of Starfleet ships, and with the specific establishing in recent DSC that most if not all of these are in fact called "starships".
- The logical connection between the fact that Kirk's ship is one out of 12 and that Kirk's ship is a starship is often misread anyway. We cannot deduce that there would exist 12 starships, any more than we can deduce that the universe contains but one man because Kirk is a man (on those days when he happens to be one, that is).
- Interestingly, Kirk himself is not famous in TOS - he knows a number of his peers, but while some of them are famous (Tracey, Garth), Kirk is never indicated to be, either among his peers or outside the community (of Constitution skippers, of starship skippers, of Starfleet officers, you don't have to take a pick because you can tick all the boxes). Relative nobodies are allowed to command Constitutions - heck, Pike appears to have been another one, even if just a few years later he is among the most decorated skippers in history.

Kirk gets famous later on all right. And it might take special guts to even accept command of an old tub like the Constitution, with decorations automatically raining on even a semi-competent CO. But getting a Constitution need not have been a feat, but more like a dare. (Also in that other context, of Mike Burnham recommending an assignment aboard one of those as a means to career progress.)

Timo Saloniemi
 
Well, that in turn involves the assumption that Kirk's ship was among a group of very special ones. And not special in the Ralph Wiggum sense, either.

Yet most Trek goes strongly against this suggestion.

- Kirk's ride isn't modern - she's ancient, even if well maintained. She looks ancient now that we have assuredly ancient ships to compare with; she also has a sordid history of extreme refits befitting an aging vessel.

Your argument here appears to be based on two things:

-Enterprise's appearance - it is possible that the fact that she sands out visually is an indication of extreme age, i.e., a significantly older design, which would go far in explaining the very out of line registry numbers we see during the show. At the same time, we see a lot of experimentation within Star Fleet (e.g., all of Discovery's drive system, or transwarp), and it's possible that someone somewhere had come up with a reason to build very smooth ships as another such experiment.
- Enterprise's history of refits - I would only call the TOS>TMP refit "extreme". The others had involved relatively low percentages of the ship and presumably easily replaceable elements like bridge modules and nacelle caps, much more tame and more along the lines of an upgrade

- Interestingly, Kirk himself is not famous in TOS - he knows a number of his peers, but while some of them are famous (Tracey, Garth), Kirk is never indicated to be, either among his peers or outside the community (of Constitution skippers, of starship skippers

But Kor knows him, and is delighted to be facing off against him. One interpretation of this datum is that Kor has been briefed by Klingon Intelligence about the guy and the ship he's constantly facing off against across the Neutral Zone, but another is that Kirk DOES have a reputation, which extends even into an alien service.
 
-Enterprise's appearance - it is possible that the fact that she sands out visually is an indication of extreme age, i.e., a significantly older design, which would go far in explaining the very out of line registry numbers we see during the show. At the same time, we see a lot of experimentation within Star Fleet (e.g., all of Discovery's drive system, or transwarp), and it's possible that someone somewhere had come up with a reason to build very smooth ships as another such experiment.

Wasn't it noted in Discovery also that the Constitution class is one of Starfleet's most advanced classes?

Appearances can be deceiving ;)
 
-Enterprise's appearance - it is possible that the fact that she stands out visually is an indication of extreme age, i.e., a significantly older design, which would go far in explaining the very out of line registry numbers we see during the show. At the same time, we see a lot of experimentation within Star Fleet (e.g., all of Discovery's drive system, or transwarp), and it's possible that someone somewhere had come up with a reason to build very smooth ships as another such experiment.

On the other hand, many of the spinoffs do their damnedest to establish nacelle shape as the era-specific thing, and the ship of Kirk/Pike in all its incarnations has the nacelles of Archer's ship, until we finally see her get a refit that supposedly truly modernizes her - and that one involves changing the nacelle shape.

In the DSC context, every ship seems to have gotten a nacelle refit to the latest boxy standard, except for Pike's ship, and that other vessel whose plot function is to indicate days past, the Shenzhou...

But that's indeed just technicalities that can be interpreted in many ways. It's just that the TOS ship being an old one goes so well with the general gist and author intent that the ship be loaded with some history, and with the general attitude that our heroes aren't operating new and fancy gear in general, except in the specific and specifically highlighted case of M-5.

What's less of a technicality here is the argument over whether the Enterprise specifically was a famous ship when Kirk got her or not. In TOS and the spinoffs coming after it in-universe, nothing of the sort is stated - but "Errand of Mercy" hints at the Klingons finding the ship infamous, even though there is no known history of it having irritated the Klingons during Kirk's tenure (unlike was the case with the Romulans).

What has now changed in that respect is that we know the ship was famous in the 2250s. We don't know the reasons, and it might simply be she was a thing because she was Christopher Pike's Ship, not because she herself would have been involved in anything important after receiving that Great Celebrity as her CO. Would the fame linger when Pike hands the ship over to Kirk? Well, d'oh - it's Pike Himself handing her over, so obviously the public would take note.

Does this mean Kirk would have to do better than others in order to receive this great gift? This is when technicalities kick in again. Perhaps Pike gives her up because she's now too outdated even for a hero to properly command? And then Kirk proves this conventional wisdom wrong, and is all the more a hero for it.

- Enterprise's history of refits - I would only call the TOS>TMP refit "extreme". The others had involved relatively low percentages of the ship and presumably easily replaceable elements like bridge modules and nacelle caps, much more tame and more along the lines of an upgrade

This is again a DSC thing, mostly. And possibly something to be worked into the fanwank of the ship's relative fame. But we'll see. In ST: Strange New Worlds, most probably.

But Kor knows him, and is delighted to be facing off against him. One interpretation of this datum is that Kor has been briefed by Klingon Intelligence about the guy and the ship he's constantly facing off against across the Neutral Zone, but another is that Kirk DOES have a reputation, which extends even into an alien service.

Yeah, this is an important distinction. Garth thinks Kirk was a great leader of warriors before he became an explorer. There's a narrow time window for that, and Kirk himself sometimes sprouts propaganda of having left war behind long ago - perhaps retroactively nicely establishing the late 2250s Klingon War as the last big one. So Kirk's fighting heroics might well precede his tenure as Enterprise CO, and the Klingons thus remember the man rather than the ship (as opposed to the Romulans again). Kor associating the man with the ship would be incidental, then. But Klingons being the ones to remember Kirk would not be incidental: Kirk would have decorated himself in Burnham's War specifically!

Might it be that McCoy knows Kirk from 11 years back - but Kirk doesn't know McCoy? Perhaps Kirk's fighting heroics were the talk of the day, and McCoy is well versed in them; conversely, Kirk can rightly assume that McCoy would know exactly what happened 11 years ago, even though the two never met, or at least Kirk never learned the name or face of McCoy.

But that would have been a tad earlier than Burnham's War... Possibly Kirk did a lot of fighting, and the big one with the Klingons was both the culmination and the point at which the UFP for a long last finally got a breather and could let Kirk do something else.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Last edited:
What has now changed in that respect is that we know the ship was famous in the 2250s. We don't know the reasons, and it might simply be she was a thing because she was Christopher Pike's Ship, not because she herself would have been involved in anything important after receiving that Great Celebrity as her CO. Would the fame linger when Pike hands the ship over to Kirk? Well, d'oh - it's Pike Himself handing her over, so obviously the public would take note.

Does this mean Kirk would have to do better than others in order to receive this great gift? This is when technicalities kick in again. Perhaps Pike gives her up because she's now too outdated even for a hero to properly command? And then Kirk proves this conventional wisdom wrong, and is all the more a hero for it.

This is again a DSC thing, mostly. And possibly something to be worked into the fanwank of the ship's relative fame. But we'll see. In ST: Strange New Worlds, most probably.
I'm staying within the bounds of TOS when I post in this forum, but we don't need DSC to be able to say the ship was probably already famous under Pike, being that it was a Constitution Class ship, but then became even more famous under Kirk. So then Pike, unfortunately, became mostly known as The Captain Before Kirk.

To use an analogy: I think it's similar to when Batman Begins was well-received when it was released, but then it was completely overshadowed by The Dark Knight three years later, so now that's the one everyone talks about.
 
What has now changed in that respect is that we know the ship was famous in the 2250s. We don't know the reasons, and it might simply be she was a thing because she was Christopher Pike's Ship, not because she herself would have been involved in anything important after receiving that Great Celebrity as her CO. Would the fame linger when Pike hands the ship over to Kirk? Well, d'oh - it's Pike Himself handing her over, so obviously the public would take note.

I'm agreeing with most of your arguments. One element here I think is worth noting, and that is "Who is famous to whom?", with the added implication of "why?" Jim Morrison's father commanded the Bonhomme Richard, but I would bet that 1) most people who went to Doors concerts wouldn't have been aware of that, and 2) most people who served on Bonhomme Richard wouldn't have been aware of that. On the other hand, it did create concerns at the Pentagon, especially once Morrison started getting arrested.

This is again a DSC thing, mostly. And possibly something to be worked into the fanwank of the ship's relative fame. But we'll see. In ST: Strange New Worlds, most probably.

Either through logical thought or reckless retconning, I'm sure they'll establish all sorts of things. :)
 
Aside from Dehner's comments I really can't see Mitchell working under Pike for 'years'. Pike was a serious Captain. He wouldn't have tolerated Mitchell's hand holding while manning the helm during a crisis..
Kirk is a 'cool' captain and ay have tolerated it from his friend. He tolerates heaps of insubordination from McCoy. Maybe Mitchell was holding back his bad behavour for years until his friend became Captain and he could relax.
 
Well, functionally Pike is Kirk, and Kirk supposedly mellowed out a lot after his uptight youth. Perhaps, after getting over his own stack-of-books-with-legs phase, Pike took Mitchell as his lover?

We already see what Pike is like when not brooding, in a series of post-"The Cage" adventures that feature both general tight spots and some personal issues. Now that guy might be on his way to embracing Mitchell and his antics, as reminders of the youth he never had. (No, he's not there yet, and probably SNW will not be long enough to show him getting there, but it's a possibility. Although whether it's a fun one is the crucial thing here.)

Timo Saloniemi
 
How old is the Enterprise in TOS?

Well, that in turn involves the assumption that Kirk's ship was among a group of very special ones. And not special in the Ralph Wiggum sense, either.

Yet most Trek goes strongly against this suggestion.

- Kirk's ride isn't modern - she's ancient, even if well maintained. She looks ancient now that we have assuredly ancient ships to compare with; she also has a sordid history of extreme refits befitting an aging vessel.
- While being a starship skipper is a big deal, Kirk isn't one out of twelve. He is one out of thousands active at the time. This is fully in line with Commodore Stone's "one in a million" line, FWIW, and with the greater Trek context of there having to exist thousands of Starfleet ships, and with the specific establishing in recent DSC that most if not all of these are in fact called "starships".
- The logical connection between the fact that Kirk's ship is one out of 12 and that Kirk's ship is a starship is often misread anyway. We cannot deduce that there would exist 12 starships, any more than we can deduce that the universe contains but one man because Kirk is a man (on those days when he happens to be one, that is).
- Interestingly, Kirk himself is not famous in TOS - he knows a number of his peers, but while some of them are famous (Tracey, Garth), Kirk is never indicated to be, either among his peers or outside the community (of Constitution skippers, of starship skippers, of Starfleet officers, you don't have to take a pick because you can tick all the boxes). Relative nobodies are allowed to command Constitutions - heck, Pike appears to have been another one, even if just a few years later he is among the most decorated skippers in history.

Kirk gets famous later on all right. And it might take special guts to even accept command of an old tub like the Constitution, with decorations automatically raining on even a semi-competent CO. But getting a Constitution need not have been a feat, but more like a dare. (Also in that other context, of Mike Burnham recommending an assignment aboard one of those as a means to career progress.)

Timo Saloniemi

On the other hand, many of the spinoffs do their damnedest to establish nacelle shape as the era-specific thing, and the ship of Kirk/Pike in all its incarnations has the nacelles of Archer's ship, until we finally see her get a refit that supposedly truly modernizes her - and that one involves changing the nacelle shape.

In the DSC context, every ship seems to have gotten a nacelle refit to the latest boxy standard, except for Pike's ship, and that other vessel whose plot function is to indicate days past, the Shenzhou...

But that's indeed just technicalities that can be interpreted in many ways. It's just that the TOS ship being an old one goes so well with the general gist and author intent that the ship be loaded with some history, and with the general attitude that our heroes aren't operating new and fancy gear in general, except in the specific and specifically highlighted case of M-5.

What's less of a technicality here is the argument over whether the Enterprise specifically was a famous ship when Kirk got her or not. In TOS and the spinoffs coming after it in-universe, nothing of the sort is stated - but "Errand of Mercy" hints at the Klingons finding the ship infamous, even though there is no known history of it having irritated the Klingons during Kirk's tenure (unlike was the case with the Romulans).

What has now changed in that respect is that we know the ship was famous in the 2250s. We don't know the reasons, and it might simply be she was a thing because she was Christopher Pike's Ship, not because she herself would have been involved in anything important after receiving that Great Celebrity as her CO. Would the fame linger when Pike hands the ship over to Kirk? Well, d'oh - it's Pike Himself handing her over, so obviously the public would take note.

Does this mean Kirk would have to do better than others in order to receive this great gift? This is when technicalities kick in again. Perhaps Pike gives her up because she's now too outdated even for a hero to properly command? And then Kirk proves this conventional wisdom wrong, and is all the more a hero for it.



This is again a DSC thing, mostly. And possibly something to be worked into the fanwank of the ship's relative fame. But we'll see. In ST: Strange New Worlds, most probably.



Yeah, this is an important distinction. Garth thinks Kirk was a great leader of warriors before he became an explorer. There's a narrow time window for that, and Kirk himself sometimes sprouts propaganda of having left war behind long ago - perhaps retroactively nicely establishing the late 2250s Klingon War as the last big one. So Kirk's fighting heroics might well precede his tenure as Enterprise CO, and the Klingons thus remember the man rather than the ship (as opposed to the Romulans again). Kor associating the man with the ship would be incidental, then. But Klingons being the ones to remember Kirk would not be incidental: Kirk would have decorated himself in Burnham's War specifically!

Might it be that McCoy knows Kirk from 11 years back - but Kirk doesn't know McCoy? Perhaps Kirk's fighting heroics were the talk of the day, and McCoy is well versed in them; conversely, Kirk can rightly assume that McCoy would know exactly what happened 11 years ago, even though the two never met, or at least Kirk never learned the name or face of McCoy.

But that would have been a tad earlier than Burnham's War... Possibly Kirk did a lot of fighting, and the big one with the Klingons was both the culmination and the point at which the UFP for a long last finally got a breather and could let Kirk do something else.

Timo Saloniemi

Some facts about the age of the Enterprise:

In "The Menagerie":

MENDEZ: You ever met Chris Pike?
KIRK: When he was promoted to Fleet Captain.
MENDEZ: About your age. Big, handsome man, vital, active.
KIRK: I took over the Enterprise from him. Spock served with him for several years.
SPOCK: Eleven years, four months, five days.

So Spock began serving with Pike 11 years, 4 months, and 5 days before Pike stopped being Spock's commander, which should be when Kirk took command of the Enteprise from PIke.

We know that the last part of Spock's service on Pke was on the Enterprise:

:
KIRK: I took over the Enterprise from him. Spock served with him for several years.

Spock was on Earth, for unmentioned reasons, a few years before the first season of TOS According to "This Side of Paradise"::

ELIAS: You've known the Vulcanian?
LEILA: On Earth, six years ago.

Possibly Spock was on Earth to take leave and visit relatives on his other's side. Possibly Spock and Pike were handling the upgrades to the Enteprise before it got a new commander. In any case, those words do not necessarily disprove Spock serving with Pike on the Enterprise for 11 years before serving with Kirk on the Enterprise.

In "The Menagerie":

MENDEZ: Oh, I'm certifying I ordered you to read it. Know anything at all about this planet?
KIRK: What every ship Captain knows. General Order 7, no vessel under any condition, emergency or otherwise, is to visit Talos Four.
MENDEZ: And to do so is the only death penalty left on our books. Only Fleet Command knows why. Not even this file explains that. (unlocks the magnetic strip) But it does name the only Earth ship that ever visited the planet.
KIRK: The Enterprise, commanded by Captain Christopher Pike.
MENDEZ: With a half Vulcan science officer named Spock.

So we know that Captain PIke and Spock visited Talos IV on a spaceship named the Enterprise. Nobody mentions an old Enterprise or a new Enterprise, so they should be talkng about the same ship. How much earlier was the visit to Talos IV?

When Spock begins telling his story of the visit to Talos IV:

SPOCK: This is thirteen years ago. The Enterprise and its commander, Captain Christopher Pike.
.

And:

SPOCK: As I stated, gentlemen, this was thirteen years ago. We were on routine patrol when the ship's sensors detected something ahead. At first we were not certain what it was.

So The Enterprise was aleady commissioned and on active service thirteen years before "The Managerie". If thriteen years is between thirteen and fourteen, and if 11 years, 4 months, and 5 days is about 11.3469 years, and if Spock began sperving with Pike duiring teh voyage to Talos IV, Kirk would have become the commander of the Enterprise about 1.6531 to 2.6531 years before "The Menagerie". If Spock began serving with Spock before the voyage to Talos IV, Kirk would take command of the Enterprise earlier.

In any case, the age of the Enterprise in "The Menagerie" should be at least 13 to 14 years.

When Pike decides to go to Talos IV:

PIKE: Address intercraft.
TYLER: System open.
PIKE: This is the captain. Our destination is the Talos star group.

[Hearing room]

PIKE [on screen]: Our time warp, factor seven.

And this implies that the engines of the Enterprise generate some sort of time warp, and the strength of the time warp determines the speed of the journey.

In "Where No Man Has Gone Before" the Enterprise is damaged by the galactic barrier:

Captain's log, Star date 1312.9. Ship's condition, heading back on impulse power only. Main engines burned out. The ship's space warp ability gone. Earth bases which were only days away are now years in the distance. Our overriding question now is what destroyed the Valiant? They lived through the barrier, just as we have. What happened to them after that?

So the space warp engines were damaged and unusable. If days means at least one but less than a week, and if years means at least one year but less than a decade, the speed of the Enteprise has now been reduced by about 52.178 to 3,652.5 times.

So is the reduced speed .which the Enterprise is now capable of faster than light or slower than light? Spock recommends that the Enterprise repair itself at delta Vega and leave Mitchell there:

SPOCK: Recommendation one. There's a planet a few light days away from here. Delta Vega. It has a lithium cracking station. We may be able to adapt some of its power packs to our engines.

I assume that a few light days are the distance light travels in a time period between one and seven days, or about 0.00273 to 0.0191 light years. If the Enterprise can now travel only slower than light, it should take at least one to seven days to reach Delta Vega. If the Enteprise can reach Delta Vega in less than one to seven days, it has to be travelling faster than light.

The latest star date before making the decision to head to Delta Vega is in Kirk's log:

Captain's log, Star date 1312.9. Ship's condition, heading back on impulse power only. Main engines burned out. The ship's space warp ability gone. Earth bases which were only days away are now years in the distance. Our overriding question now is what destroyed the Valiant? They lived through the barrier, just as we have. What happened to them after that?

And the next stardate after making the decision to change course to Delta Vega is in Kirk's next log:

Star date 1313.1. We're now approaching Delta Vega. Course set for a standard orbit. This planet, completely uninhabited, is slightly smaller than Earth. Desolate, but rich in crystal and minerals. Kelso's task, transport down with a repair party, try to regenerate the main engines, save the ship. Our task, transport down a man I've known for fifteen years, and if we're successful, maroon him there.

So the entire voyage to Delta Vega seems to take less than 0.2 stardate units. The next log in 0.2 stardate units later:

Captain's log, Star date 1313.3. Note commendations on Lieutenant Kelso and the engineering staff. In orbit above us, the engines of the Enterprise are almost fully regenerated. Balance of the landing party is being transported back up. Mitchell, whatever he's become, keeps changing, growing stronger by the minute.

And apparently right after the log Dehner says:

DEHNER: He's been like that for hours now.

So apparently there are at least ten hours in a stardate unit in that era.

Later, after regaining consciousness, Kirk says:

KIRK: When Mister Spock recovers, you'll both transport up immediately to the Enterprise.
PIPER: But Captain
KIRK: If you have not received a signal from me within twelve hours, you'll proceed at maximum warp to the nearest Earth base with my recommendation that this entire planet be subjected to a lethal concentration of neutron radiation. No protest on this, Mark. That's an order.

The last stardate is in Kirk's last log:

KIRK: Captain's log, Star date 1313.8. Add to official losses, Doctor Elizabeth Dehner. Be it noted she gave her life in performance of her duty. Lieutenant Commander Gary Mitchell, same notation. I want his service record to end that way. He didn't ask for what happened to him.

It is possible that 1313.8 is a little bit after the 12 hours are over. But Kirk's fight with Mitchell should be before the 12 hours are over. And Mitchell makes a tombstone with an inscription predicting Kirk's death at 1313.7, apparently the stardate at the time of the fight.

So there are fewer than twelve hours in 0.4 of a stardate unit, making a stardate unit less than 30 hours long, and more than 10hurs long. Thus the voyage to Delta Vega should take fewer than 6 hours between stardates 1312.9 and 1313.1. Assuming that the voyage takes two to six hours and is one to seven light days, or 24 to 168 light hours, the speed of the Enterprise would seem to be somewhere between four and eighty four times the speed of light. And so the previous speed of the Enterprise, when the space warp capability could be used, would have been in the range of 208.712 to 306,810 times the speed of light,

So either the impulse engines are capable of faster than light travel, or the Enterprise's warp drive uses both time warp and space warp to travel faster than light, and only the space warp was disabled, and the ship could travel faster than light using impulse engines and the time warp capability.

So it seems consistent for Pike to say:

PIKE [on screen]: Our time warp, factor seven.

When they find a camp of survivors on Talos IV:

SURVIVOR: Is Earth all right?
PIKE: The same old Earth, and you'll see it very soon.
TYLER: And you won't believe how fast you can get back. Well the time barrier's been broken. Our new ships can

So it seems that the time barrier has been broken and the new ships can get the survivors home to Earth in a very short period of objective or subjective time compared to the time it took them to get to talos IV.

So assuming that the mention of "time warp factor" means that the Enterprise is one of those "new ships" resulting for the breaking of the time barrier, it must be a ship that Tyler thinks that the survivors would not have known about when they left Earth. How long ago did the survivors leave Earth?

Nobody knows. But there is a minimum time span.

When the Enterprise intercepts the distress message from the Columbia:

COMM OFFICER: A ship in trouble making a forced landing, sir. That's it. No other message.
TYLER: I have a fix. It comes from the Talos star group.
NUMBER ONE: We've no ships or Earth colonies that far out.
SPOCK: Their call letters check with a survey expedition. S.S. Columbia disappeared in that region approximately eighteen years ago.
TYLER: It would take that long for a radio beam to travel from there to here.
SPOCK: Records show the Talos group has never been explored. Solar system similar to Earth, eleven planets. Number four seems to be Class M, oxygen atmosphere.
NUMBER ONE: Then they could still be alive, even after eighteen years.

And later:

NUMBER ONE: Well, shall we do some time computation? There was a Vina listed on that expedition as an adult crewman. Now, adding eighteen years to your age then.

Spock's "approxiamtely eighteen years" should be 18.0 to 19.0, or maybe 17.5 to 18.5, or maybe at teh most 17.0 to 20.0 years. So 17.0 to 20.0 plus 13.0 to 14.0 should be somewhere between 30.0 and 34.0 years.

So the crew of the Columbia should have been out of touch with events on Earth for 17.0 to 20.0 years at the broadest, plus whatever length of time they were cut off from contact with Earth before crashing on Talos IV. So "our new ships" should have been constructed sometime between 13.0 years and 34.0 years before "The Menagerie", plus whatever length of time the Columbia was out of contact with Earth before crashing.

So I have considered the Enterprise to be about 13 to 34 years old in "The Menagerie".

But today, September 23, 2020, I thought that possibly the Enterprise wasn't one of "our new ships". Possibly the time warp was invented and ships like the Enterprise had it as part of their warp drive. But there was a "time harrier" which limited the effectives of the time warp in making space travel faster. Sometime after 30 to 34 years befre "The menagerie", the "time barrier" was broken and new ships could travel much faster than older ships like the Columbia.

Maybe Tyler didn't claim that the Enterprise was one of "our new ships". Maybe he meant that the Enterprise could take the survivors to a base where they could take a new ship to Earth and get there much faster than on an old ship like the Columbia or the Enterprise.

And such a theory would seem to be the only hope for those who want the Enteprise to be older than about 13 to 34 years in "The Menagerie".

In "Is There no Truth in Beauty?" One of the guests aboard the Enteprise is Lawrence Marvick.

KIRK: We mustn't keep the ambassador waiting. If you'll go with Mister Scott, I'm sure the two of you will have a great deal in common.
SCOTT: Aye, indeed. It's a rare privilege meeting one of the designers of the Enterprise.

So Lawrence Marvick was one of the designers of the Enterprise. He was portrayed by David Frankham, who is still alive, born 16 February1926. He was aged 42 years, 5 months, and 0 to 6 days when his scenes for "Is There no Truth in Beauty?" were filmed July 16 to 24, 1968. And whenever I watch the episode he doesn't look like they used makeup in an attempt to make him look older than this age.

So 42 minus 13 to 34 makes Marvick aged about 8 to 29 when designing the Enterprise, perhaps as a junior member of the design team. Thus belief that the Enterprise is at the older part of its possible age range implies that Marvick was a boy genius when he helped to design it. Or maybe the character of Mark was many years older than he looked, maybe twice as old as Miranda Jones.

If someone considers tAS canon, there is information on the age of the Enterprise in "The Counter-Clock Incident".

Captain's log, stardate 6770.3. The Enterprise is on course for the planet Babel, where ambassadors from all Federation planets are waiting to honour the Enterprise's distinguished passenger, Commodore Robert April, first captain of the USS Enterprise, and for the past twenty years, Federation Ambassador at large. Now seventy five years old, Commodore April has reached mandatory retirement age.

So April last commanded the Enterprise twenty years earlier, when he became a Federation Ambassador at large, or sometime earlier before becoming an ambassadore. If "The Counter-Clock Incident" must be less than 6 years after "The Menagerie", 20 years before "The Counter-Clock Incident" must be more than 14 years before "The Menagerie", so it is possible that Pike became captain of the Enterprise when April became ambassador at large. Or possibly Pike became captain of the Enterprise before April became ambassador at large, since there could have been one or more captains between April and Pike.

If April is aged 75, and was at least 35 when he became captain of the Enterprise, that would have been less than 40 years before "The Counter-Clock Incident".

(McCoy enters with Mrs. April)
MCCOY: Jim, I didn't realise how many of the tools I use in Sickbay were designed by Sarah.
SARAH: As the first medical officer aboard a ship equipped with warp drive, I'm afraid I had to come up with new ideas all the time.

This implies that Sarah was already an adult and a doctor when warp drive was first used on ships. So possbly there is a science fictional reason why she is a lot (centuries?) older than she looks. Or maybe she left out some important qualifiers in her statement. Possibly she was the first medical officer on a ship eqipped with the new form of warp drive, the time warp drive introduced after the time barrier was broken. In that case the Enterprise should be no more than thirty to forty years old, and possibly younger, in "The Counter-Clock Incident".

In Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan both Khan and Kirk say it has been fifteen years since their last meeting, which presumablyw as right after "Space Seed"..

If "Space Seed" was less than 6.0 years before or after "The Menagerie", happening durint the same five year mission, the Enterprise should be 7 to 40 years old in "Space Seed". Adding 15.0 to 16.0 years to that, the Enterprise should be 22 to 56 years old in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Assuming that "Space Seed" happens less than half a year before or after "The Menagerie", the Enterprise would then be about 27.5 to 34.5 years old in "Space Seed" and about40.5 to 50.5 years old in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.

So it seems very strange that in the next movie, Star Trek II: The search for Spock , which begins soon after Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan ends, Admiral Morrow, claiming that the Enterprise is old and useless, says:

MORROW: I'm sorry, Mister Scott, but there will be no refit.
KIRK: Admiral, I don't understand. The Enterprise is not...
MORROW: Jim, the Enterprise is twenty years old. We feel her day is over.

Possibly Morrow's home planet has years much longer than Earth years.

And that si all the evidence I can remember about the age of the Enterprise.
 
Last edited:
...And the Correct Answer that has now been revealed to us is within those bounds - if we freeze-frame and squint in a certain ENT episode, we can tell NCC-1701 was launched in 2245, and the Gregorian dating of TOS is established elsewhere, giving Kirk's ship her slightly over two decades of service history during the TOS adventures. And then roughly two more during the TOS movies.

Not that we couldn't one day get an Even More Correct Answer, though. If Morrow is saying that the Enterprise was born with her latest refit (a time interval easily approximated as two decades), perhaps the "IaMD" readout is saying that 2245 is when she was first refitted into the ship we know and love, despite having previously been sailing the depths of space under some other name or in some other configuration.

As for Sarah April, it's pretty trivial to read her statement as her having been the First Medical Officer aboard a ship equipped with warp drive, the equivalent of her hubby saying he was the Captain aboard a ship equipped with warp drive. That is, being the CO or the CMO is a bigger responsibility on a deep space starship than on a shallow space sublight boat, and the "First" is merely part of Sarah's title.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top