• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers How it will end, your predictions.

We find out when Georgiou lands during a post end credits scene. I’ll go out on a limb and say she is greeted by Trip in the 23rd century, who isn’t dead after all.

I like it, Trip is one of founding members of Section 31, his "death" was faked so he can take on the job. Possibilities of Archer (and/or Porthos) cameos..
EXCEPT..
Producers will not be touching anything ENT related with a 10-6-foot socially distanced poll. Never... Ever..
 
I like it, Trip is one of founding members of Section 31, his "death" was faked so he can take on the job. Possibilities of Archer (and/or Porthos) cameos..
EXCEPT..
Producers will not be touching anything ENT related with a 10-6-foot socially distanced poll. Never... Ever..

Well, Trip was closer to the blast than anybody else (much closer) and yet the others were dead instantly. That he survived even for a minute is already insanely unlikely but to think that he wasn't dead... Could only be if the whole thing was a lie and nothing of this happened. Archer and Shran got together and concocted this whole incident to allow Trip to go undercover or something like that.
 
Well, Trip was closer to the blast than anybody else (much closer) and yet the others were dead instantly. That he survived even for a minute is already insanely unlikely but to think that he wasn't dead... Could only be if the whole thing was a lie and nothing of this happened. Archer and Shran got together and concocted this whole incident to allow Trip to go undercover or something like that.
Yep, that's how I always took it. Not that I want to recall anything from TATV (still too soon), the whole incident was based on federation records recreated in a holodeck. And records can always be messed with. It's very possible, some of these events, or maybe most or very possibly ALL of these events didn't happen as recorded.
Retcon the reason for all of this being founding of Section 31, and you actually got a half decent plot.
Except, it ain't ever going to happen.
 
Yep, that's how I always took it. Not that I want to recall anything from TATV (still too soon), the whole incident was based on federation records recreated in a holodeck. And records can always be messed with. It's very possible, some of these events, or maybe most or very possibly ALL of these events didn't happen as recorded.
Retcon the reason for all of this being founding of Section 31, and you actually got a half decent plot.
Except, it ain't ever going to happen.

Only in books, maybe.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
"Don't let it end this way, captain."

Basically this, only with Burnham and Book stumbling upon a dying Vance in his office after Osyraa has stormed the Starfleet HQ. No, the line will remain the same. Cue a 200-pages-long shitstorm of a thread debating whether his dying words constitute a field promotion for Burnham or not. Either that, or this'll merely be what some viewers moan at their screens just before the credits roll.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
"Don't let it end this way, captain."

Basically this, only with Burnham and Book stumbling upon a dying Vance in his office after Osyraa has stormed the Starfleet HQ. No, the line will remain the same. Cue a 200-pages-long shitstorm of a thread debating whether his dying words constitute a field promotion for Burnham or not. Either that, or this'll merely be what some viewers moan at their screens just before the credits roll.

The pink blood, just ruined that scene for me. Some warriors!! I mean black blood, dark blue or khaki, I could understand but PINK for warriors!!! Are you kidding me?
 
IIRC, the only reason Klingon blood was pink in ST VI was because we saw so much of it.

Meaning: If the blood had been a normal color, like red, it would have triggered an R rating.
 
IIRC, the only reason Klingon blood was pink in ST VI was because we saw so much of it.

Meaning: If the blood had been a normal color, like red, it would have triggered an R rating.
That's exactly why. In all other instances Klingons bleed red.

Not that it should matter much what color there blood is. Unless Vulcans and Romulans are somehow lesser opponents for bleeding green?:vulcan:
 
I like it, Trip is one of founding members of Section 31, his "death" was faked so he can take on the job. Possibilities of Archer (and/or Porthos) cameos..
EXCEPT..
Producers will not be touching anything ENT related with a 10-6-foot socially distanced poll. Never... Ever..

There have been three ENT characters that have been referenced in the Kurtzman era.

Archer (Admiral Cornwell, Discovery)

Shran (USS Shran, Discovery)

Trip (Boimler, Lower Decks)

There was also the crew of the NX-01 as a holoprogram (Riker, Lower Decks), but that was more of a joke referencing TATV.

I don’t think their references were by accident.
 
I think we’ll find out Georgiou went to the Kelvin Universe.

If she went back, even to the 22nd Century, couldnt she have warned Starfleet about the Burn. Not stop it since she doesn’t know how it started but at least find a way to mitigate the damage.
 
Kovich will be revealed to be the True Enemy.

Vance will be furious that he's been fooled for so long by this Evil Mastermind.

To Be Continued...
 
My predictions are as follows.

Book will die heroically, the Child will do something that justifies them not killing it they moment they discovered it caused the burn, Saru will step down as captain, Tilly will for some reason get to keep her position as commander, and I give it a 50/50 chance that Burnham will get put in the captain's seat.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top