• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

How is interrogation done?

JoeZhang

Vice Admiral
Admiral
Starfleet intelligence performs a covert op (using their standard team of some random starship crew wearing black suits carrying hand phasers) and they capture a top romulan agent.

They know this agent has some information vital to the survival of the Federation - how do they get it off him?

Polite questions? Drugs? telepaths? rubber hose around the balls?
 
Kirk did it Starfleet style and with all due vehemence in "Journey to Babel" after capturing the fake Andorian agent:

"He's been subjected to questioning under verifier scan and truth drug. He reveals nothing. I suggest his mind has been so conditioned as part of a preconceived plan."

We don't know what was done in hopes of inducing the prisoner to talk, but we can assume that the "verifier scan" (probably similar to what we saw in "Wolf in the Fold") and "truth drug" would massively increase the reliability and value of the information gained. They would also make the process much more efficient and thus perhaps more humane, as the prisoner could not engage in falsehoods and thus misdirect the interrogation.

Indeed, it might be that there would be little or no need to coerce the victim when these apparently near-perfect truth-verifying means are available. Unless specially and very carefully trained, the prisoner would quickly reveal his deepest secrets even when only uttering a few initial phrases. The interrogators could now ask the exact right questions, and under the scan, a refusal to answer a question would tell almost as much as an answer.

In contrast, Klingons in "Errand of Mercy" used their "mind sifter" or "mind ripper" at what they thought was sufficient setting against Vulcans, yet failed to get through Spock's cover story. Spock knew something of the device in advance, but this experience would probably lead Starfleet to completely dismiss this and related techniques. What good can mindreading technology be when it so utterly fails even in the hands of the most ruthless operators?

Romulans and Cardassians are credited with classic interrogation tactics, many of which take a lot of time to be effective. Nothing futuristic there, and although the Federation might engage in similar tactics, those wouldn't much help our covert ops team which presumably is in a hurry.

However, a couple of novels, short stories and an ENT episode have dabbled in the use of virtual reality in futuristic interrogation. I guess any TNG era interrogation would automatically take place on a holodeck where reality could be subtly or grossly manipulated to enhance the process.

There's one aspect that has never quite been explored in onscreen or printed Trek yet, but might affect 24th century interrogations: the advanced state of the healing arts. Future medicine might not be useful only in the form of truth drugs - it might also be applied in a more sinister manner. The victim could be essentially skinned alive, cut to pieces and burned to crisp, and then restored to perfect health afterwards... Perhaps a Federation covert ops team in a hurry would proceed simply by applying a sledgehammer on the victim and promising that the effects will be reversed the very moment he, she or it talks?

Timo Saloniemi
 
There's one aspect that has never quite been explored in onscreen or printed Trek yet, but might affect 24th century interrogations: the advanced state of the healing arts. Future medicine might not be useful only in the form of truth drugs - it might also be applied in a more sinister manner. The victim could be essentially skinned alive, cut to pieces and burned to crisp, and then restored to perfect health afterwards... Perhaps a Federation covert ops team in a hurry would proceed simply by applying a sledgehammer on the victim and promising that the effects will be reversed the very moment he, she or it talks?

I'd seriously hope the Federation doesn't do that.
In "Terok Nor: Dawn of the Eagles" however the Cardassians
skin Tahna Los alive during an interogation, then heal him using dermal regenerators and start over again.
 
I'm going with Timo on this. Once again, his reply is clear, well-thought out and makes sense. As for the skinning, etc-Maybe the Federation doesn't do that...:klingon:
 
in the novel "A Time to Heal" Deanna uses a variety of interrogation techniques on a Tezwan prisoner including:

prolonged sleep deprivation through white noise, odd meal times, having a Spec Ops drill instructor sing cadences and marching songs, having Data sing opera, playing Klingon opera and all sorts of other psychological tactics that are legal under UFP law, but aren't entirely ethical...

none of which actually succeed in making him talk, but hey...
 
I wonder if the use of drugs was acceptable in "Journey to Babel" only because an agent who will not identify his allegiance/affiliation isn't protected under any accord relating to the treatment of prisoners.

The use of drugs and torture on Picard during "Chain of Command, Part Two" at least seemed a violation of the Seldonis IV Convention, in context.

By the same token, Janeway seems perfectly willing to say, "Tuvok ... mind meld," if it'll garner her the information she wants ... and she's not the only captain who's done this.
 
Last edited:
I would imagine that some type of psychological torture is allowed during Federation/Starfleet interrogations.

Please, do not be alarmed.
We are about to engage The Nozzle.
Please, do not move while The Nozzle is engaging.
Moving will disrupt calibration of The Nozzle.
Please, wait while we calibrate The Nozzle.
Please, do not look away from The Nozzle.
The Nozzle is now calibrating.
The Nozzle is still calibrating.
The Nozzle has completed calibration.
Thank you.
 
I wonder if the use of drugs was acceptable in "Journey to Babel" only because an agent who will not identify his allegiance/affiliation isn't protected under any accord relating to the treatment of prisoners.

I don't think this sort of legal protection would have any practical value. After all, if the agent says "I work for myself" or "I work for the Pink Elephants Marching Band", he would have to immediately come under the protection that the "no identification" clause would deny him. The interrogators could never be allowed to wantonly decide "he's lying" or "the PEMB doesn't exist", or the protection would be worthless.

The Seldonis Conventions were said to deal specifically with prisoners of war, which Picard chose not to be; a classic plot twist in these types of stories. Whether any comparable rules exist on the treatment of secret agents or other practitioners of malicious masquerade remains unknown.

Timo Saloniemi
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top