Maybe some of these figures need to be adjusted for 2014 as this was a necro'd thread from 2010. I'm sure it's even more expensive now in today's dollars.


I know the "canceled" subject has been debated to death... mediocre ratings matched to a very expensive budget per episode spelled the death of Enterprise. Although I'd question how effective the rating systems really are, outside of "grand slam" showings.
Anyway, since the budget was noted a number of times as being very expensive, I'm wondering what made it so and how it ranked next to other Star Trek series. I have to admit, season 3 and 4 were more elaborate than season 1 and 2. The show seemed to be hitting its stride by the 2nd half of its run. But what are the aspects of production that are the most expensive? Would the show have gone to season 5 if the staff had been a little more conservative, made more with less to keep the budget down?
"Broken Bow" cost as much as $15 million before the mainstay sets were even factored in. "Caretaker" cost as much as $25 million, all in. Each episode cost something like $3 million, sometimes more, so it was not cheap for anyone involved. Because a lot of costs (namely CGI) came down over time, "Enterprise" seemed to do more with the same budget DS9 and Voyager had.
Completely agree with both of you. Whatever money was spent, it was all up there on the screen. Enterprise looked fantastic.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.