I like a good laugh.
That's not the topic here, in case you've forgotten.What have you?
Nothing much at all - but I'm not the one knocking this movie across the board and calling the people in charge twerps without ever having seen it. Firing my own question back at me is a sure sign of someone with no answers and no rational basis for any of his arguments. If you took the time to explain why you think they're wrong (without ever having seen anything of the movie), that at least would be something.What have you?
Nothing much at all - but I'm not the one knocking this movie across the board and calling the people in charge twerps without ever having seen it. Firing my own question back at me is a sure sign of someone with no answers and no rational basis for any of his arguments. If you took the time to explain why you think they're wrong (without ever having seen anything of the movie), that at least would be something.What have you?
End of rant and off-topic discussion.
So, back to my point: Why do so many here think that lithium HAS to be dilithium? Isn't it reasonable to think they might need lithium for something in the 23rd century, or that they used it before dilithium, or that you need the one to make the other?
KIRK: If you mean strand Mitchell there, I won't do it. That station is fully automated. There's not a soul on the whole planet. Even the ore ships call only once every twenty years
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.