There are two people who think that Voyager ruined their life?
I was wondering about that, myself.
I voted "I like Voyager, but I prefer DS9."
The show had enough issues and problems to fill several runabouts, but on the whole, I still liked it more than I disliked it. And I think some of the problems stemmed from inconsistency within the staff: looking back, it seems like several of the primary writers at various points in the shows life had different ideas about where to go with certain characters, storylines, etc. That and a general lower level of quality of writing in general from the entire writing staff when compared to TNG or DS9 (IMO, naturally) led to a lot more weak episodes, and (more importantly when discussing the flaws of the show as a whole) severe inconsistency, particularly when it came to Janeway. Meddling from UPN and Rick Berman's frustrating insistence that they "play it safe" and not push the boundaries (on a show that - because of it's premise - had the potential to push Trek's boundaries every bit as much as DS9 did) didn't help matters.
I enjoyed it more often than I hated it (though I was often just indifferent to it, especially during the first 3 seasons), but it could have been SO much more.
This is what really gets me most about Voyager. They had so much potential to not just be "TNG in the Delta Quadrant", but that's what it ended up doing. What's maddening to me is that by the time the writing generally was better, they had long since dropped the intial premises of the show.
This is also why I don't think DS9's first season is that great compared to subsequent ones; many of the stories felt like TNG episodes that just got slapped onto DS9. When they started taking more advantage of their unique position, it got better. And I think the episodes where Voyager did that are among its best, too. Unfrotunately, VOY didn't go into a trend of it, unlike DS9; it was just once in a while.
And I love TNG. But TNG is TNG. I want something different when I watch DS9 or VOY.