It made the bridge seem alive. On TNG it felt like it had too much empty space given how big it was. The extra stations made it feel like more of a true command center.
plus Worf finally gets a chair…
It was a nice looking set, and that's just from my perspective watching the movie. And indeed, according to interviews, many involved in the production side of things fell in love with the Generations version and were saddened they only spent something like a couple weeks filming the bridge scenes for the movie before that set was destroyed.
This is just my opinion; nothing more, nothing less. But the extra consoles installed on the walls were kind of pointless to me. There are the ops and con stations at the front, the tactical station behind the three seats, and then the aft stations in the back. That's quite enough.
As for the TNG bridge having "too much empty space" I actually prefer the extra space on the sides. It's nice to have space to be able to comfortably move around whereas the
Generations bridge looked cramped with those side consoles that actually made the bridge look smaller. I don't mind Worf finally getting a chair though lol
You know, I find it fascinating how
Generations is a popularly hated piece of
Star Trek media but a good number of people like it's version of the Enterprise D bridge... whereas I actually don't hate
Generations all that much (but agree that the writing for it was mediocre at best but that's another thread) but I prefer the TV TNG bridge over the one from
Generations.
That actual set of the Enterprise D can never be used as a museum for fans to visit, since the ramp connecting the upper and lower halves of the bridge is too steep to meet public health and safety regulations. It's the whole reason why the replica of the bridge they had at Star Trek The Experience at Vegas was built all on one level.
That's a bummer. I kind of looked forward to being on that bridge, the same one that the TNG cast actually walked on, even if it's not the one from the early 90s back when TNG was in production. It is in the Star Trek Archives though as confirmed by Blass.
Then again I'm sure the steepness of the ramp isn't going to stop some determined superfan(s) from doing their own Enterprise D bridge recreation. But thanks for that piece of information because I've been wondering for years why EAV version of the bridge had that glaringly-obvious inconsistency that was the shallow ramp.
The one thing I don't get though. Is why they didn't update the D's bridge. All the ships from the Generations era are archaic looking compared to Pikes/ Kirks/Burnham's era. They should have not had carpet. Make it look bigger. Lots of bright led lights, window view screen and shiny as a new penny. But we got the bridge from the old outdated 1980's TV show. Back when they used cheap material and stuff you could find in any hotel lobby of the time...
I'm not sure of the in-universe reason for this but I can give you the behind-the-scenes reason:
The goal was to recreate the original TNG bridge as exact to the early 90s version of the set as possible. An "update" wouldn't have given that nostalgic effect that the recreation of the Season 4-7 bridge gave off so I'm glad they stuck with that. Plus remaking that bridge made it feel like an episode of TNG, which I'm sure was Matalas' goal.