• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Horrific miscasting of the week - Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher?

I've never heard of this character but the description sounds very generic. Anything to distinguish him from a hundred other action roles?
 
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/one-shot-tom-cruise-090000289.html

Regardless of whether you love or hate Cruise, this is horrific miscasting - Reacher is a huge guy with a build like Schwarzenegger and a laconic straight-talking personality that's kind of halfway between a John Wayne character and a Clint Eastwood one. Cruise is totally wrong in both build and screen personality.

And it's a rubbish choice of first adaptation too - they should start with Killing Floor...

I've never read any of the Lee Child novels, but I'm willing to go with you on this because it said he and the director last collaborated on "Valkyrie" and I thought Valkyrie was boring shit.
 
Am not happy with this either.

Reacher is much more than I have ever seen TC present on screen. The character is a drifter/loner (though that is not the right term if you take it at face value.)

TC just never impressed me as the kind who could convincingly forgo his creature comforts.
 
I don't know, he was pretty impressive in Collateral Damage.

That's the other thing - really a relative unknown would be a better fit, because as is, even if Cruise is on top form as in, say, Collateral Damage, we're going to be seeing Cruise not Reacher.

Collateral_Damage_film.jpg

Yes, I'm thinking of just Collateral for Cruise on top form...
 
I didn't like Collateral, I thought he was poor in that, he seemed the most obvious hitman ever (maybe that was the point I don't know) I quite liked him in Knight and Day however, I think he's better suited to lighter roles these days (maybe even always, though he was very good as Lestat) but for me the trouble is that he's always Tom Cruise.

Oh well could be worse, they could have cast him as Bond :eek:
 
I've never heard of this character but the description sounds very generic. Anything to distinguish him from a hundred other action roles?

He has a policeman's curiosity and detective skills and a soldier's fighting ability. He has underdog instincts and an a suspicion of authority. He also has a dry sense of humour and is irresistible to women. Reacher owns nothing but the clothes on his back, his fold-up toothbrush and, latterly, some ID. He has no home and travels from town to town, exploring America (as he grew up an army brat around the world and thus didn't see his own country).

This may all sound generic but Lee Child's writing style is so addictively sparse and yet descriptive, as he explains how Reacher solves crimes, uncovers wrong-doing and takes down the bad guys all with relentless, unassailable logic.

I do think part of Reacher's essence is his size - people don't want to fuck with him and when someone is foolish enough to, they discover that appearances aren't deceptive. He really can kick your ass! Sure, Cruise asskicked very well in MI and others, but he's not the same relentless force of nature that Reacher is
 
Well he was supposedly miscast as Lestat as well...

Indeed he was.
Not to Anne Rice. Granted, she did voice publicly her initial reservations and doubts when he was first cast, but that ended once she saw him in action.
http://www.angelfire.com/ri/cerat/AnneOnTom.html

Bully for Anne Rice, she created Lestat and all, but for my money (which I spent on a ticket to the damn movie), Cruise-as-Lestat did not evoke in me any recognition of the dude I'd just finished reading about.
 
I thought he was rather good as Lestat. The whole cast were good. I just didn't warm to the story.
 
Starkers said:
Well he was supposedly miscast as Lestat as well...
Indeed he was.
Not to Anne Rice. Granted, she did voice publicly her initial reservations and doubts when he was first cast, but that ended once she saw him in action.
http://www.angelfire.com/ri/cerat/AnneOnTom.html

Bully for Anne Rice, she created Lestat and all, but for my money (which I spent on a ticket to the damn movie), Cruise-as-Lestat did not evoke in me any recognition of the dude I'd just finished reading about.
He may not have been your cup o' tea, but it still means that not everyone believed he was indeed miscast for the part.
 
I'm curious to see the shortlist (pun intended) for this movie:


Dustin Hoffman IS Jack Reacher!

Al Pacino IS Jack Reacher!

Michael J. Fox IS Jack Reacher!

Danny DeVito IS Jack Reacher!

Peter Dinklage IS Jack Reacher!

Warwick Davies IS Jack Reacher!

Verne Troyer IS Jack Reacher!
 
Let's just pretend that this isn't happening.
I just hope that they don't start putting Cruises gurning mug on the book covers.
They have done that with Ken Branagh for the Wallander books(he's all wrong too IMO)and that other guy(name?) for Mark Billinghams' Tom Thorne books.Very offputting.
 
There's wrong (Mark Wahlberg as Bob Lee Swagger in Snhooter) and then there's spectacularly wrong, which is what this is. This is 'invent a bad piece of casting' bad. This is Woody Allen as Superman. Arnold Schwarzenegger as Robin Hood. Rupert Grint as Zorro. That level of bad.

And I actually like Cruise. But the only Reacher he is is Chest-High Reacher.
 
When I'm reading a Reacher book I'm visualizing Russell Crowe from the L A confidential period.
Granted Crowe is no world-beater but he seems to have the necessary menace to play Reacher.
 
^ Adam Baldwin works for me. Could see Crowe with the requisite attitude and delivery but he too is far too small. Ray Stevenson is another possibility. Liam Neeson is physically a good choice but I don't think he has the right personality.

If they'd started filming the series with that prequel novel set when Reacher was still in the army, Chris Hemsworth or Alexander Skarsgard could have played him.
 
Let's just pretend that this isn't happening.
I just hope that they don't start putting Cruises gurning mug on the book covers.
They have done that with Ken Branagh for the Wallander books(he's all wrong too IMO)and that other guy(name?) for Mark Billinghams' Tom Thorne books.Very offputting.


But it sells books--and gets more people to read the original novels, which is almost always a good thing.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top