Hey, need some Help, does anyone have...

[137th Gebirg]

Roger that. Will try to get to that this week, weekend at latest.

Also, be advised that these are hand-drawn from the "before days", prior to wide-spread use of CAD, Corel, Adobe Illustrator or other such apps and the different views are not likely to sync up well at all. I am genuinely curious what you're going to come up with for this. Based on your historical efforts, however, I have absolutely NO doubt you're equal to the task!

 

[Atolm]

Roger that. Will try to get to that this week, weekend at latest.

Also, be advised that these are hand-drawn from the "before days", prior to wide-spread use of CAD, Corel, Adobe Illustrator or other such apps and the different views are not likely to sync up well at all. I am genuinely curious what you're going to come up with for this. Based on your historical efforts, however, I have absolutely NO doubt you're equal to the task!

That works And thanks again. You'll see.

 

[motx72]

Could you scan it? or take a pic of it?

Okay. I got it scanned a little bit ago, and just uploaded.

Enjoy everyone!!!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/99034771@N00/51433484886

 

[Commodore_Sarvour]

Here's the first I ever saw of it, from Kelly Communique #13

I LIKE this ship! On par with the (canon) Ambassador-class, imho!

I think whoever wrote that description was confused about dates. The Enterprise-A was commissioned in 2286. To say that this Enterprise-C was launched in 2293 means that there was only a seven year span of time between the A's commissioning, the A's decommissioning, the B's commissioning, the B's decommissioning, and the C's launch!

It's based on the old FASA/Spaceflight Chronology timeline, which is off by about 50 years to canon (TOS is the turn of the 23rd century, to tie in Wrath of Khan's intro and Kirk's "200 years ago" TOS references). Pretty sure the text is copied from the 1988 FASA TNG Officer's Manual.

That's what i was thinking!

 

[137th Gebirg]

Okay. I got it scanned a little bit ago, and just uploaded.

Enjoy everyone!!!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/99034771@N00/51433484886

That's the one - Beat me to it!

Thank you, actually. I wasn't looking forward to putting all those little pieces together. It's a big poster.

 

[motx72]

That works And thanks again. You'll see.

Can't wait to see how it turns out!

 

[Atolm]

Okay. I got it scanned a little bit ago, and just uploaded.

Enjoy everyone!!!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/99034771@N00/51433484886

Thanks bro!
@137th Gebirg Can just upload this...as it is large ...lol

 

[137th Gebirg]

Yeah, I'll probably make a new higher-resolution update from the SSDB off this scan. Will be much easier now.

 

[motx72]

Yeah, I'll probably make a new higher-resolution update from the SSDB off this scan. Will be much easier now.

Great idea! I've been hoping to get the Alaska-class "out there". Aside from shipschematics, it's practically non-existent.

 

[Bernard Guignard]

Thank you very much for this.

 

[publiusr]

Now I seem to remember that the top and side view seem to suggest a different length secondary hull...rather like how there are two widths of the Ambassador class.

So you might want to do two versions. A top view to go with a side view and vice versa.

 

[motx72]

Now I seem to remember that the top and side view seem to suggest a different length secondary hull...rather like how there are two widths of the Ambassador class.

So you might want to do two versions. A top view to go with a side view and vice versa.

Yes! I love the front & side views. If we could get the top view to truly match, that would be great. There have been several “interpretations”, but no one has yet to simply correct the top view.

 

[motx72]

So you might want to do two versions. A top view to go with a side view and vice versa.

Actually, I like the idea of vice-versa as well. Gives us an Alaska-class "variant" to enjoy!

Great way to build on the Alaska-class legacy.

 

[publiusr]

Just keep the saucer flat.

 

[motx72]

Just keep the saucer flat.

I agree. I also like the flat/wide secondary hull, just as it is illustrated in the original poster. Most "redesigns" of the Alaska class involve "rounding out" the secondary hull.