• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Hey, I never noticed that before....

How much time elapsed during their turbolift ride? He could have moved. They don't need to stay still like when they're transporting.

It reminds me of Spock's return in TMP, where logically, Chekov was in the turbolift with him, and if you look closely, when they go back to a wide shot, you can see him just finish sidling up behind Uhura, which means that during Kirk's shocked leap from his chair, and Spock's dramatic stone-faced gaze in close-up, Chekov was off-screen quietly slipping out on to the bridge from behind Spock so as not to disrupt the moment.
 
How much time elapsed during their turbolift ride? He could have moved. They don't need to stay still like when they're transporting.

Any amount of time. Starfleet uses magical and inconsistent turbolifts:

#2 -- 1:23 into the video:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



For more:
#1:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

#3:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Spock cleverly tricks Kirk into taking shore leave by leaving out Kirk's name. It kind of reminded me of when Nathan told David about Uriah the Hittite's death with the allegory about the sheep. Both leaders saw the truth of the matter when they didn't know it was about them.

SPOCK: Very well, Captain. Something I did come to discuss.
KIRK: Yes, Mister Spock, what is it?
SPOCK: I picked this up from Doctor McCoy's log. We have a crewmember aboard who's showing signs of stress and fatigue. Reaction time down nine to twelve percent, associational reading norm minus three.
KIRK: That's much too low a rating.
SPOCK: He's becoming irritable and quarrelsome, yet he refuses to take rest and rehabilitation. Now, He has that right, but we've found
KIRK: A crewman's right ends where the safety of the ship begins. That man will go a shore on my orders. What's his name?
SPOCK: James Kirk.

12 And the Lord sent Nathan to David. He came to him and said to him, “There were two men in a certain city, the one rich and the other poor. 2 The rich man had very many flocks and herds, 3 but the poor man had nothing but one little ewe lamb, which he had bought. And he brought it up, and it grew up with him and with his children. It used to eat of his morsel and drink from his cup and lie in his arms,[a] and it was like a daughter to him. 4 Now there came a traveler to the rich man, and he was unwilling to take one of his own flock or herd to prepare for the guest who had come to him, but he took the poor man's lamb and prepared it for the man who had come to him.” 5 Then David's anger was greatly kindled against the man, and he said to Nathan, “As the Lord lives, the man who has done this deserves to die, 6 and he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing, and because he had no pity.”

7 Nathan said to David, “You are the man!
 
I was watching 'Operation Annihilate', the thing I noticed was Kirk orders hand Phasers to stun setting 3.

This implies either setting 1or setting 2, is standard.

However, we are told in the Star Trek the Next Generation Technical Manual, that Klingons are immune to setting one...

Starship crews, should be trained to independently evaluate the situation.
 
I was watching 'Operation Annihilate', the thing I noticed was Kirk orders hand Phasers to stun setting 3.

This implies either setting 1or setting 2, is standard.

However, we are told in the Star Trek the Next Generation Technical Manual, that Klingons are immune to setting one...

Starship crews, should be trained to independently evaluate the situation.
Possibly:
Setting 1 = light stun (victim not unconscious but groggy like with Dr. Crater in The Man Trap)
Setting 2 = regular stun (victim unconscious for a short while - minutes?)
Setting 3 = heavy stun (victim unconscious for a long while - hours?)
 
As per 'The Star Trek the Next Generation Technical Manual' ; stun 1, for a base level humanoid is five minutes, stun 2 for a base level humanoid is fifteen minutes, stun 3 for a base level humanoid is one hour.

Yes, in the episode 'The Man Trap' a Phaser is set to stun, but note on the close up, the setting wheel has different grades. It isn't zero to one, it is zero point something all the way up to one and so on...

So fractional settings do exist. Not allowing for range.
 
Possibly:
Setting 1 = light stun (victim not unconscious but groggy like with Dr. Crater in The Man Trap)
Setting 2 = regular stun (victim unconscious for a short while - minutes?)
Setting 3 = heavy stun (victim unconscious for a long while - hours?)
Phaser Setting 3 is for when you want your target to be shocked and stunned. ;)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
And a third degree burn of one cubic centimeter in diameter at the point of impact...

Which tells us that the power of setting 3 is one hundred calories.

This is a problem. Permanent scars will result...
 
I rewatched "Devil in the Dark" tonight with my housemate in celebration of TOS' 59th Anniversary, and at one point early in the episode when they're talking about the possibility of silicon-based life, Bones says "silicone" instead. :lol:
Yes, the new ones are so perfectly round as to cause suspicion, whereas the old ones can become hideous misshapen things that can cause alarm.
 
I rewatched "Devil in the Dark" tonight with my housemate in celebration of TOS' 59th Anniversary, and at one point early in the episode when they're talking about the possibility of silicon-based life, Bones says "silicone" instead. :lol:
That was the first episode I ever saw of Trek, back in early October 1973. I was 6 years old. I confess I didn’t notice McCoy’s gaffe. 😉
 
Gaff? I'd say it's just the way some people pronounce it. Like some folks pronounce radiator as "RAD-ee-ay-ter" instead of "RAY-de-ay-tor." Or data instead of data. :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top