Re: Hey, everyone! DRG's DS9 novel after Sacraments is called ASCENDA
I had a discussion about religion and religious characters in Trek with a friend of mine who is Jewish Orthodox...he was actually disheartened by some of the new borderline token characters, as he always felt that the federation era earth had moved beyond overt displays of relgious belief towards something more personal to the individuals.
That's interesting. I do understand his point, but I don't think you'd ever have a situation where there's a absence of those who feel more comfortable being overt about such things.
For what it's worth; to me, literally any form of group affiliation, or any identity defined by sheltering under an ideological umbrella, is counter-intuitive and counter-productive, but I have to accept that the majority of people see affiliation and the urge to equate identity with group membership as normal. In the same way, I can't believe that the Federation, even if its "norm" (to whatever extent such a sprawling and diverse civilization could be said to have one where most matters are concerned) is to centre religious feeling internally or indulge it privately, wouldn't accept that there are some people who feel the desire to walk around in overtly religious garb and express themselves publicly. I mean, I have to work hard sometimes to accept that people aren't
always making a political move and posturing / signalling / preening when they do something publicly or express affiliation, that people do have an individual identity outside of where they fit into the political structure. I suppose the Federation would likewise understand that people being overtly and obviously "Muslim", "Christian", "Hindu", etc., are quite often being true to themselves and no more deliberately imposing than anyone else. That is, it's the
same self-committed private belief, only worn a bit more obviously.
Actually, this reminds me of some of the observations I've privately made regarding peoples of various European nations VS Americans on flag-waving and overt patriotic display. Europeans tend to distrust such things, associating them with intolerant, even war-like extremism, and thus have a tendency to shoot suspicious looks at Americans, who like to wave their flag and be overtly patriotic at - if you'll excuse me

- the slightest opportunity. But the perspectives are different, of course, because the histories are different. Europe is a long-established web of nations, races and bloodlines with a history of tribal conflict and national tensions; they thus often shy away from overt signals of national pride in the modern era. Americans, by contrast, are a young nation founded by successive waves of diverse immigrants who all intermixed, built a new nation, fought a civil war and then reaffirmed their union in its aftermath. It strikes me that gathering around a symbol of shared identity and celebrating it is something that strikes many Americans as natural and healthy, to a degree that many Europeans find suspect. I think the idea of overt religious expression in the future of the Federation Earth might well be something similar: it strikes some as uncomfortable while others see it as nothing provocative to the idea of how that society functions.