That article, wow. Kring is still out to lunch about what killed
Heroes.
Kring blamed the Peacock for having too much interference as far as the plot goes, causing the writers to sacrifice some of their creative ideas.
Of the myriad of problems
Heroes had, "creativity" was not one of them. They presented a lot of creative ideas, pretty much every idea in the superhero playbook. Their problems were more basic: they didn't know what to do with their ideas. They failed with storytelling basics like characters whose motivations make sense; characters who behave with enough intelligence that we won't lose respect for them; characters who have a reason to be in the story; character arcs (that go somewhere!) for at least the major characters if not the minor ones; plotlines that are well-paced and have resolutions and are not just abruptly dropped; plotlines where events follow logically from one to another; dialogue that doesn't make us cringe; and an overarching theme so that we feel that there's a point to what we're watching other than mindless activity.
"It becomes very hard to kill off certain characters," said Kring. "The network has a very strong say in this, because of actors who are under contract and do publicity for them. It's not just up to the writers to decide."
Does this guy not work in the television business?!? It's well known that fan-favorite characters are a strong motivating factor to keep audiences watching, and therefore networks will not permit them to be killed off. He should have expected that if his show were successful at all, there would be at least a few sacred cows to deal with. I woulnd't know what to do with dead weight like Hiro or Claire, either, but Kring should have conceived all the major characters anticipating that he might have to write for them for years. AND THAT INCLUDES SYLAR!!!
Speaking of how he would have changed the story if he could, Kring said "I would have done fewer episodes. Thirteen a season is fabulous - you can really control the quality and the way you craft them. The sheer number of episodes has been a real struggle for us. Most shows shoot eight days, and we sometimes shoot as many as 15 days an episode."
Self-serving baloney. S2-4 of
Heroes was not a killer core story, padded with a lot of extraneous material. It was a bunch of crap with no good core to it at all. If the only thing wrong with
Heroes was that Kring et al were forced to pad out their wonderful 13 episodes with 10 episodes worth of filler, it wouldn't have been nearly as bad as it was. I can handle filler if there's something worthwhile happening - well-paced filler can be a nice way of moderating the emotional intensity of the core story - but that was not the case with
Heroes at all. If Kring had had 13 episode seasons, we would have gotten 13 crappy episodes.
Switching topics: with the carnage of cancellations this season, the number of watchable shows has now crashed pretty severely. (The fact that I would have counted
Heroes among the watchable shows proves that the problem here is not that I have overly high standards.

) When CW and CBS chime in with their new 2010-11 pilots, I'll start a Gen Media thread about them...some do sound promising...even if once upon a time, I thought
FlashForward and
V sounded promising too.

I guess I never learn!