What do you mean probably?I'm probably a teenager, and I wasn't bored at all by Hellboy II. How could you be? The movie was a visual feast.
I act a lot younger than I am.
What do you mean probably?I'm probably a teenager, and I wasn't bored at all by Hellboy II. How could you be? The movie was a visual feast.
OK. I had thought you were post school age, post college.What do you mean probably?I'm probably a teenager, and I wasn't bored at all by Hellboy II. How could you be? The movie was a visual feast.
I act a lot younger than I am.
OK. I had thought you were post school age, post college.What do you mean probably?
I act a lot younger than I am.
Heck don't we all act younger than we are at times. Maybe here of all places?
I thought Hellboy II had character development. It wasn't extraordinary character development, but it was existent.
It made good money, reviews from critics and audiences alike are possitive, so there's a good chance for a part 3.Hellboy 2 edged out Hancock on its second week this past weekend at $34m dollars compared to its $85m + marketing budget. No foreign boxoffice, it seems.
A respectable enough opening, I suppose, I hope it continues to do well and the foreign box-office helps it out some. I'd sure like to see a Hellboy 3.
Sounds like every comic book I've ever read in the last 30 years, honestly.I thought Hellboy II had character development. It wasn't extraordinary character development, but it was existent.
No, it really didn't. There was almost a story there about Red growing up, but really it was just about Liz thinking he wasn't ready when there was nothing in the story that demonstrated he actually wasn't ready. Abe falling in love, likewise. There were plot points, but no actual development. No one changed. Besides all that there were three different Little Bads (the troll thingy with the arm, the elemental and the Golden Army soldiers) who all show up and do nothing but smash things and roar inarticulately. I've already seen the Incredible Hulk this summer...
The down side is that IF if gets part 3, which I hope it does, AND the studio wants to wait on Del Torro to finish his dual Hobbit films it will be about 5-6 years before HB:3 comes to us. So we are looking at 2013 or 2014.It made good money, reviews from critics and audiences alike are possitive, so there's a good chance for a part 3.Hellboy 2 edged out Hancock on its second week this past weekend at $34m dollars compared to its $85m + marketing budget. No foreign boxoffice, it seems.
A respectable enough opening, I suppose, I hope it continues to do well and the foreign box-office helps it out some. I'd sure like to see a Hellboy 3.
It depends also if Del Toro is doing the Hobbit films straight thru or seperate filming schedules. He could easily do the Hobbit if he films straight thru and starts Hellboy 3 while the Hobbit is working on the visual effects.The down side is that IF if gets part 3, which I hope it does, AND the studio wants to wait on Del Torro to finish his dual Hobbit films it will be about 5-6 years before HB:3 comes to us. So we are looking at 2013 or 2014.It made good money, reviews from critics and audiences alike are possitive, so there's a good chance for a part 3.Hellboy 2 edged out Hancock on its second week this past weekend at $34m dollars compared to its $85m + marketing budget. No foreign boxoffice, it seems.
A respectable enough opening, I suppose, I hope it continues to do well and the foreign box-office helps it out some. I'd sure like to see a Hellboy 3.![]()
Now they could get another director but really I'd rather wait for Del Torro than get a Ratner like fill in for part three.
Five years is straight from Del Torro in an interview. Unless he said the shooting of HB:3 was relocated to him. I guess he has time but he will be in New Zealand overseeing so much with editing and Weta's F/X he will have to be in NZ for that whole time. So the only way to get ahead of that 5 years it seems, at current, to move any possible HB:3 shoot to him.It depends also if Del Toro is doing the Hobbit films straight thru or seperate filming schedules. He could easily do the Hobbit if he films straight thru and starts Hellboy 3 while the Hobbit is working on the visual effects.The down side is that IF if gets part 3, which I hope it does, AND the studio wants to wait on Del Torro to finish his dual Hobbit films it will be about 5-6 years before HB:3 comes to us. So we are looking at 2013 or 2014.It made good money, reviews from critics and audiences alike are possitive, so there's a good chance for a part 3.![]()
Now they could get another director but really I'd rather wait for Del Torro than get a Ratner like fill in for part three.
We shall see, I guess.Five years is straight from Del Torro in an interview. Unless he said the shooting of HB:3 was relocated to him. I guess he has time but he will be in New Zealand overseeing so much with editing and Weta's F/X he will have to be in NZ for that whole time. So the only way to get ahead of that 5 years it seems, at current, to move any possible HB:3 shoot to him.It depends also if Del Toro is doing the Hobbit films straight thru or seperate filming schedules. He could easily do the Hobbit if he films straight thru and starts Hellboy 3 while the Hobbit is working on the visual effects.The down side is that IF if gets part 3, which I hope it does, AND the studio wants to wait on Del Torro to finish his dual Hobbit films it will be about 5-6 years before HB:3 comes to us. So we are looking at 2013 or 2014.![]()
Now they could get another director but really I'd rather wait for Del Torro than get a Ratner like fill in for part three.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.