I'm way behind BUT what a show... Breaking Bad good. With my brain I'll lose a thread here and there, but the presentation has been so good despite a complicated storyline that I'm still halfway up to speed. 4 eppies in.
Shocked she didn't die already. It was a classic "You'll never guess what I found, I've uncovered the entire secret plot! Hold on, I'll tell you about it in a couple minutes instead of letting you know right now..." moment, which usually guarantees death within seconds to keep the other characters in the dark. That she isn't already dead is in itself shocking...One thing I don't like about last night's episode, Elsie made a classic horror movie mistake. Just hang around in the place you know a dangerous person frequents after you prove something seedy is happening. Bad things shouldn't happen to characters because they make silly obvious mistakes.
Tons. Here's just a few.
1. Why the logo for Westworld was drastically different for William than it is in the current time frame.
Why do you think this matters? Yes, designs change over time, but there's no guarantee that every single instance of the WestWorld logo would be updated to fit changes in said design
And before I get accused of "ignoring evidence" again, an older logo and a an area that looks like it could be an abandoned subway entrance to the park aren't evidence of anything without external interpretations being applied to them and therefore don't mean much.
Nah, they just add stuff like that due to... let's call it incompetence or laziness or something. Showing both a pristine subway and a rundown one? Just happenstance; doesn't mean anything at all. Showing William and Logan completely disappearing from the background when the camera goes around Delores? They just had to take a wee break. True nuff, true nuff. It has no meaning.Now, from our real world storytelling standpoint, there was a reason the show staff intentionally chose to use a 43 year old logo for that particular scene.
Do we have a real reason to believe it's not? That they created a whole new set just for background scenery, and decided to scuz it up for funsies? Or was there an actual reason to show two completely different subways, especially for a facility that -- you know -- doesn't need two subway stations.Do we know its the same subway?
Yeah, Yul Brenner's host was a nice Easter egg (and that is a great example of what an Easter egg actually is, by the way).Anyway, an intriguing episode, I did a little squee when I saw the Brynner Host. Elsie was pretty dumb, I mean the damn place even looked like a set from a horror movie and she hung around there way too long.
I think he was just a prototype or proof-of-concept model. The park had already been up and running for a few years by the time William (if the theory is correct) arrived, after all, and Robert and Arnold had to create some sample models to sell the idea to their investors to begin with. It's the fact that Old Bill is literally the only host we've seen that looks anything like that says a lot, however. I mean, even in the flashback (a real one) we got of the first gen hosts being built, their skinjobs were just as realistic as the modern ones despite having more traditionally robotic guts, just like Robert's family.The animatronic Hosts Arnold made for Robert did look as convincing as Delores, but I still don't understand where Old Bill fits into things design wise.
I don't get why people keep saying that. The vast, vast majority of people I've seen saying it probably never would have noticed all the telltale clues until it was pointed out to them. But because a few people did notice them and "spoiled" them (which, no, you're not doing by theorizing about a show; spoilers are facts) about it seems to be the real reason I see comments like this.I will still be annoyed if William does turn out to be MiB, not saying the idea is completely without merit but the contrivances to make it work will dilute the effect.
And, again, she was in both a drawn picture and in a mugshot shown in the database of first gen models Bernard pulled up. She was in the episode, just not "live."As for Rachel Evan Wood being in the titles, when Maeve was watching the ad for Westworld we did see a blonde woman in a blue dress riding across the range, it looked like Delores to me. The video also contained a brief glimpse of Angela from ep 2 so maybe she's been around for 30 years as well?
Actually -- and this is just persona conjecture with nothing to really back it up -- I think they're slowly making it so that Maeve will be the villain of the piece, while Delores will be the hero once more and more of the hosts begin to awaken. I also think Maeve's artificial awakening is being orchestrated by Robert himself (someone directly tinkered with her programming) while Delores is clearly Arnold's "natural" awakening. Given that Robert seems to have been largely oblivious or ignoring Arnold's plan until recently, that gives quite a bit of merit towards what's going on with Maeve. Especially since he has been aggressively initiating his own overly complex plans to... I dunno, thwart? Arnold's.Thandie Newton has rapidly become the most interesting character in the show, although it is a frightening commentary on free will that her rebelliousness is just another set of programming, although now she's upped her perception score (loved that bit from an RPG/computer game perspective) perhaps she will become more sentient?
Having everyone be a robot (guests, staff, and hosts) would seem to be too much of an obvious cliche.
I suspect I'll have to watch the whole thing again at the end of the season -- something I sometimes find necessary with the the other Nolan brother's movies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.