Yes, but the ship is powered by beer. Function over form!
Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted design?
- Thread starter Chrisisall
- Start date
- Status
Yes, but the ship is powered by beer. Function over form!
You are SO lucky I can't locate you on my sensors, beam to your location, & open up a can of Finnegan whoopass on your butt for that remark...
Go back to Kelvin & explain your findings, with some scotch.
Yes, I was focusing on MY favourite era designs, obviously.
I am prepared to accept negative comment on a design I merely appreciate; dis the original OS design, and be prepared for full phaser fire.
*Hic*
Federation Ale rules!!!
*Hic*
I think it looked decent onscreen. I wasn't too thrilled about the basic design before seeing the movie, but I felt the same way when I saw the first live-action Transformers images. I felt they looked too "busy" to keep them realistic, but they largely translated well onscreen.
Re: Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted the desig
It's one of the worst features of the new movie.Yes or no will do unless you feel the need to wax positive or negative.
Re: Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted the desig
I actually like it somewhat less now than I did originally. Call me strange, but I think the original promotional image showcased it from one of it's best angles, and my opinion changed accordingly the more I saw of it.
I actually like it somewhat less now than I did originally. Call me strange, but I think the original promotional image showcased it from one of it's best angles, and my opinion changed accordingly the more I saw of it.
Re: Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted the desig
No sir, don't like it.
No sir, don't like it.
Nardpuncher
Rear Admiral
I think the first pic they released (with the shuttle approaching) was not very flattering. That was one thing...it just hit my eye wrong.
Other views made it look a bit better...and it did look great moving on screen.
Other views made it look a bit better...and it did look great moving on screen.
The ships is amazing. Love its massive size,increased speed and firepower
The ship was seemingly designed to look its best from a side profile view, but when at an angle it can be a mixed bag. A VERY mixed bag. Some angles it actually looks terrific (I'm thinking of the grocery store standee of the Enterprise which looked great.) Then some it looked really bad, I.E. the first angle we saw. I think they just got a bit carried away with the secondary hull/pylons/nacelles is all.
Disillusioned
Commander
I've always accepted that it's ugly, inside and out.
Yeah! Because Starfleet ships are built for war, dammit!
If the ship doesn't look good at a neutral angle, it's not a good design, period
Last edited by a moderator:
Its size is highly debatable, but what evidence is there of any increased speed or firepower?
I was being sarcastic.
No
Re: Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted the desig
Yes they have
Yes I will answer for them.
TY
Yes or no will do unless you feel the need to wax positive or negative.
Yes they have
Yes I will answer for them.
TY
Re: Have those who disliked the Abramsprise finally accepted the desig
At this point in the thread, 15 accept it, 12 don't & 1 finds it, seemingly, too mixed to say.
At this point in the thread, 15 accept it, 12 don't & 1 finds it, seemingly, too mixed to say.
Based on its fast trip to Vulcan, its crazy ROF for the phasers and the powerful torps
- Status
Similar threads
