Re: Has the Typhon Pact Books Became Yuuhzan Vong Invasion of Star Tre
Sorry about that.

Not meaning to make light of the issue,
Knight Templar.
On the serious front, I suppose you could see the
NJO and
Typhon Pact books as similar in some respects, as regards challenging some of the assumptions of their franchise's setting. Certainly, the Typhon Pact forces a re-evaluation of the Federation's position in the galaxy and some readers are going to be wary of that, or disappointed with what they see as events unfold. But I don't view the new uncertainty regarding the UFP's role and power in the galaxy as a straightforward negative. Nor do I think it breaks with Trek's optimistic vision in general. After all, Trek is supposed to be about exploring new worlds and seeking out new perspectives, and the "Typhon Pact era" gives us a strange new world for the Federation to find its place in. It lets them (hopefully) reaffirm their ideals and their vision in the face of the unknown and the uncertain. Kirk was never one to let risk and danger put a stop to his Trekkin', was he?

And fans didn't think the
Enterprise flying into danger and facing crises every week made it a depressing ship of the damned. The show was about how and why those dangers or potential dangers were faced, and how our protagonists overcame obstacles and faults. Now it's the Federation's home region that's somewhat risky and dangerous, but the spirit behind the stories remains the same, or so I'd say. Especially seeing that the Pact is a challenge that should provoke self-examination on the Federation's part, raising questions of identity and purpose, challenging self-doubts. They're not just a potential external threat, they serve to fan the flames for familiar ideas about self-betterment and self-affirmation. It's about perservering and growing, seeking new understanding in the face of adversity. And yes, sometimes stumbling. As the Vong would tell us (in a disturbingly eager fashion no doubt), pain is part of the path to self-improvement. And of course the Typhon Pact may be a potential threat, but it's no Yuuzhan Vong.
One of the ideas hinted at often in later 24th century Trek, and explored frequently in literature and in fan discussion, is the 24th century Federation's complacency. "Kirk boldly went, blazing the unknown, while Picard sat in a comfortable flying hotel secure that the Federation was on top of everything".
Losing the Peace even made it explicit that post-
Destiny Trek is a bit more like Kirk-Trek than Picard-Trek. The Typhon Pact is our Strange New World, and yes, we're going to have a few mashed redshirts or insane computer massacres and McCoy shouting "my god man, show some empathy you green-blooded computer!" But it's worth it, isn't it?
Forgive me saying so, but I'm also not sure why the
Typhon Pact books are being singled out for apparent negativity. While hoping this won't backfire by seeming to validate a "Trek lit is depressing" viewpoint (

),
Vanguard featured setbacks and losses nearly every book, and each discovery or piece of groundwork laid diplomatically, scientifically, etc, came at a price.
The Lost Era had cold wars and black ops and any number of complications to the Federation's business, and the
Deep Space Nine Relaunch featured a long string of problems and disasters for Kira, Dax, Taran'atar, etc.
A Time To... had a string of problems for Picard especially; even
Klingon Empire has the Klag Family Troubles. And whenever a character goes home to their planet, whether it's in the
Worlds of DS9 books or
SCE or wherever, it's always just in time for a crisis.

Obviously, there has to be some sort of challenge or complication for the characters to work around or to have their development molded by or their personal qualities explored through. I don't see the
Typhon Pact books as anything other than the next set of obstacles and problems for the characters to work through.
Of course, this is all subjective, so I'm not trying to tell anyone they're wrong if they find the Pact books too negative. I just don't agree, is all.