• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Has Strange New Worlds returned to a more 'hopecore' vision of the future?

As long as we never have to think about the 31st century, Star Trek is about hope. That's also about the setting not the show.
The 31st century, when they’re actively rebuilding the Federation and acting entirely out of hope, and inspiring it where it has been gone?

(And the flip side: Plenty of TOS episodes were pretty bleak, especially early on. “Where No Man Has Gone Before” doesn’t speak too well for humanity; “Charlie X” and “The Man Trap” are tragic, etc.)
 
The 31st first century seasons were all about hope though.

Yes, and bluntly, I got actively angry with their portrayal of it.

Building the Federation back gets done offscreen and they argue forgiving negligent mass murderers is a happy ending.

The 31st century, when they’re actively rebuilding the Federation and acting entirely out of hope, and inspiring it where it has been gone?

Basically, mocking the actual difficulties and saying that the Orion dictator who wants peace needs to die but the genocidal mining barons should be forgiven.

Also, they killed Adam Jensen and that cannot stand.
 
Basically, mocking the actual difficulties and saying that the Orion dictator who wants peace needs to die but the genocidal mining barons should be forgiven.
The what now? What mocking of difficulties is there? The Orion dictator wants order at the point of a gun, and iirc the barons work for her. She only wants peace if she’s forgiven. Whereas the Federation’s rebuilding a world where all that’s not a thing. It seems pretty clear-cut.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top