If not, there's always selling crack.
But where does one find crack in the first place? Is there a supply depot somewhere? Can I order it from a catalog? Or is it like a Tupperware party...but with crack?
I don't know how these things work.
If not, there's always selling crack.
I have no idea. Look it up on WikiHow.If not, there's always selling crack.
But where does one find crack in the first place? Is there a supply depot somewhere? Can I order it from a catalog? Or is it like a Tupperware party...but with crack?
I don't know how these things work.
part of the problem, IMO, seems to be that people are going to college because they are supposed to, instead of wanting to. So they go, but go to have fun, or major in easier things, just graduating with whatever degree they can get, instead of having a plan going in. Not to say you should know what you want to do with your life at 18, but an attempt to train yourself in a needed or useful field is certainly helpful.
Fortunately, I ended up working at a company that uses MUMPS, and most of the people who know MUMPS are in the process of retiring. There's a ton of legacy systems out there running MUMPS, too. That, combined with the version control expertise I picked up, should serve me well for at least another 10 years, if not longer. I'm picking up other skills along the way, but my MUMPS expertise is still the core of my resume.
Sometimes things work out, and sometimes they don't and you're forced to course-correct.
So, if I had any advice to give to the under-30 crowd, it would be this: specialize, specialize, specialize! Find a niche in your industry and learn it, inside and out. Try to be a generalist and no one will want you, because generalists are cheap and interchangeable.
The flip side of this is my dilemma: the niche you specialize in disappears.
I wanted to be a commercial automotive shooter, and the niche was still viable when I was in school. So, I concentrated my studies and experience there.
Shortly after I graduated, the industry switched from traditional photography to computer generated imagery. Most automotive shooters have had to scramble for a new skill set, or fail. Upstarts like me never had a chance. I have a big expensive education and no job, no industry to show for it.
I'm fortunately employed, but hate my job. Instead of making the 100K per shoot I would have as a first assistant, as I would have been had I graduated and entered the field 5-10 years earlier, I'm stuck behind a freaking desk, photoshopping jpegs for peanuts.
That's also a very good point. You gotta be sure the niche you pick is a strong, healthy one. Sometimes that's not very easy to predict.
Back when I was a teenager, I had my hopes pinned on getting into web programming. CGI programming was still fairly new--it was the mid-'90's and interactivity hadn't really taken off on the web yet. Well, the dotcom explosion happened, then it collapsed. I had no idea what I was going to do, because I wanted nothing more than to do web programming.
Well, there isn't much money in web programming anymore. Not to say there are no jobs in that field, just that there's a glut of people with that skill set, and not enough jobs to go around.
Fortunately, I ended up working at a company that uses MUMPS, and most of the people who know MUMPS are in the process of retiring. There's a ton of legacy systems out there running MUMPS, too. That, combined with the version control expertise I picked up, should serve me well for at least another 10 years, if not longer. I'm picking up other skills along the way, but my MUMPS expertise is still the core of my resume.
Sometimes things work out, and sometimes they don't and you're forced to course-correct.
The flip side of this is my dilemma: the niche you specialize in disappears.
I wanted to be a commercial automotive shooter, and the niche was still viable when I was in school. So, I concentrated my studies and experience there.
Shortly after I graduated, the industry switched from traditional photography to computer generated imagery. Most automotive shooters have had to scramble for a new skill set, or fail. Upstarts like me never had a chance. I have a big expensive education and no job, no industry to show for it.
I'm fortunately employed, but hate my job. Instead of making the 100K per shoot I would have as a first assistant, as I would have been had I graduated and entered the field 5-10 years earlier, I'm stuck behind a freaking desk, photoshopping jpegs for peanuts.
That's also a very good point. You gotta be sure the niche you pick is a strong, healthy one. Sometimes that's not very easy to predict.
Back when I was a teenager, I had my hopes pinned on getting into web programming. CGI programming was still fairly new--it was the mid-'90's and interactivity hadn't really taken off on the web yet. Well, the dotcom explosion happened, then it collapsed. I had no idea what I was going to do, because I wanted nothing more than to do web programming.
Well, there isn't much money in web programming anymore. Not to say there are no jobs in that field, just that there's a glut of people with that skill set, and not enough jobs to go around.
Fortunately, I ended up working at a company that uses MUMPS, and most of the people who know MUMPS are in the process of retiring. There's a ton of legacy systems out there running MUMPS, too. That, combined with the version control expertise I picked up, should serve me well for at least another 10 years, if not longer. I'm picking up other skills along the way, but my MUMPS expertise is still the core of my resume.
Sometimes things work out, and sometimes they don't and you're forced to course-correct.
Eat, or program in MUMPS; that's a really tough choice...
Retirement is still going to happen, whether you want it to or not, so it's not changing. What's changing is how you fund your retirement.
Holdfast, your plan is great provided you planned to never have a family!
{stuff}
While I can understand why some people hate MUMPS with a passion, I kind of like weird languages that give you a loaded shotgun and then don't tell you how to avoid shooting yourself with it.I'm also a perl programmer.
Hey I'm a Delphi expert so there ya go...
Retirement, I'm saving as best as I can, but the ultimate goal is to have a business that funds it.
Retirement is still going to happen, whether you want it to or not, so it's not changing. What's changing is how you fund your retirement.
I know this is your field anyway, but still, this is one of the best posts on the subject I've read here.
Reasonable goal, would require some effort.I came to the conclusion that I needed to plan properly for my own retirement a long time ago. I aimed to retire at 50,
A ridiculous goal that was worthy of working for. What's the worst that could happen if you were focused on it?though secretly hoped that I could manage at 40 or in my wilder moments, 35,
But since I've saved and planned so aggressively, I should be able to work the equivalent of about 20-25% of full time and still be comfortable for about 10+ years, assuming no sideline grows, and the market is static.
QFTPoint is - plan properly, and start early. No-one else will do it for you.
Holdfast, your plan is great provided you planned to never have a family!
This is true. I guess that made it easier. I don't have any plans to do so, and frankly, never have. If I change my mind, I'll just need a rich wife.![]()
I would like to first say that financial terms make my head hurt. Even simple stuff like deciding if my 401k contributions would be "Roth" or "pre-tax" caused me a massive headache, and that was before I figured out what those actually meant.
That said, I was looking at my 401k yesterday and it occurred to me that I'm not sure if I'm doing all I can with it. I'm contributing 6% on a Roth basis; 6% is the maximum employer-match amount. There's about 20k in the account right now.
But it's all in a "stable value fund", which gets me a "rate of return" of only 1.6% or so at best. Should someone like me bother looking at other investment options, or is that just going to get me in trouble since I probably won't keep on top of it enough? What about letting Fidelity's "experts" manage it for me? They might be able to do something more useful with it, but they also take an annual fee for their services, and I have no way of knowing whether the one will exceed the other.
I would like to first say that financial terms make my head hurt. Even simple stuff like deciding if my 401k contributions would be "Roth" or "pre-tax" caused me a massive headache, and that was before I figured out what those actually meant.
That said, I was looking at my 401k yesterday and it occurred to me that I'm not sure if I'm doing all I can with it. I'm contributing 6% on a Roth basis; 6% is the maximum employer-match amount.
But it's all in a "stable value fund", which gets me a "rate of return" of only 1.6% or so at best.
Should someone like me bother looking at other investment options,
or is that just going to get me in trouble since I probably won't keep on top of it enough?
What about letting Fidelity's "experts" manage it for me? They might be able to do something more useful with it, but they also take an annual fee for their services, and I have no way of knowing whether the one will exceed the other.
Holdfast, your plan is great provided you planned to never have a family!
This is true. I guess that made it easier. I don't have any plans to do so, and frankly, never have. If I change my mind, I'll just need a rich wife.![]()
Never marry for money, you can always borrow it cheaper.![]()
So my question is, is retirement changing due to these job hoppers?
Most of us who have tried to get good jobs are often turned down because of our lack of experience. The thing that sucks about that is that in this current climate it's damn near impossible to actually get the experience you need.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.