Harry Potter 7 to not be in 3D

[AvBaur]

By the way, has anyone made a 3D black & white film yet? You know, just to be needlessly artsy?

Apparently, Tim Burton is making one: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1142977/

 

[Greylock Crescent]

^ 3D, black & white, and animated? It's the holy trinity!

EDIT:
I see that it's stop-motion animation. Still. Just wow.

 

[Canadave]

In Cameron We Trust.

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

 

[Itisnotlogical]

I wouldn't pay extra to see a movie in 3D, because the effect is never as spectacular as I'd been led to believe. Sure, it's kind of a nifty optical effect, but in the end it's the same movie, except you're wearing stupid glasses to watch it.

Besides, Avatar is one of the more well-known 3D movies, and I won't touch anything that came within 5 meters of James Cameron's political statem- I mean, propa-

... you know what I mean.

 

[T'Baio]

In Cameron We Trust.

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

Transformers 3 will be in 3D.

And millions will seizure, stroke and die.

 

[Harvey]

How on Earth will Michael Bay's fast cutting translate to the 3D process without being an incomprehensible mess? By which, I mean, even more incomprehensible than his directorial style is at present in two dimensions.

 

[Candlelight]

In Cameron We Trust.

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

Transformers 3 will be in 3D.

And millions will seizure, stroke and die.

No, that got canned.

Oh wait, now it's back on.

 

[Mr. Adventure]

Not 3D? This movie will make $60M tops. Man, this is going to look SOOOOO dated in 2025, mark my words.

 

[T'Baio]

How on Earth will Michael Bay's fast cutting translate to the 3D process without being an incomprehensible mess? By which, I mean, even more incomprehensible than his directorial style is at present in two dimensions.

I'm hoping if the movie is as bad as the second, that the 3D will kill me.

 

[Skywalker]

James Cameron was quoted as saying by 2025 all films will be in 3D.

Knowing Cameron, we won't even see Avatar 2 until 2025.

 

[theenglish]

In Cameron We Trust.

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

Transformers 3 will be in 3D.

And millions will seizure, stroke and die.

I thought that Michael Bay said this would not be in 3D? But I could be wrong.

And for all the doubters out there, I read on CNN that Toshiba? is debuting a no-glasses-needed three D television this weekend.

 

[Joshua Howard]

^ Seeing the overdone, cluttery graphics in the first Transformers movie made me completely uninterested in ever seeing any more Transformers films ever again, 3-D or not. Even without the 3-D, it gave me a headache.

I don't want to see Harry Potter in 3-D, so this is good news. I like Harry Potter as it is and has been, and I see no reason to go down that road. Certainly, there are great graphical elements in Harry Potter; but the greatest parts of the film are the acting, the score, and the drama/story. It doesn't really need to be a rollercoaster ride.

 

[cultcross]

Glad to hear this news, I had deep reservations about HP shifting to 3D just for the last two instalments, and especially Part 1 is likely to be more an atmospheric road/quest type movie that (hopefully) isn't too effects reliant. I'd rather have it in 2D.

 

[Greylock Crescent]

I wouldn't be surprised, though, if Deathly Hallows, pt. 2 was in 3D.

 

[T'Baio]

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

Transformers 3 will be in 3D.

And millions will seizure, stroke and die.

I thought that Michael Bay said this would not be in 3D? But I could be wrong.

The inventor of the PACE 3D camera changed Bay's mind. It's been shot in 3D.

 

[theenglish]

^^^^
Really? Okay. Not a fan of the movies myself, but my wife really likes them.

 

[Tulin]

In Cameron We Trust.

I'll believe it when I see it. And when big-name directors like Christopher Nolan and (of all people) Michael Bay come around to the technology.

Transformers 3 will be in 3D.

And millions will seizure, stroke and die.

If they're paying money to see that shit, ESPECIALLY after knowing how bad the first two were, they deserve to die.

Take 'em out of the gene pool and make the human race better.

 

[Mike Farley]

I wouldn't be surprised, though, if Deathly Hallows, pt. 2 was in 3D.

Right now, that's the plan.Warner's simply ran out of time to finish converting Part 1 before the premier date and didn't want to push it back.

 

[Shazam!]

I imagine they'd already spent a fair bit of time and money in converting it, so I think it'll probably get re-released in 3D just before Part II comes out.

 

[FordSVT]

I wouldn't pay extra to see a movie in 3D, because the effect is never as spectacular as I'd been led to believe. Sure, it's kind of a nifty optical effect, but in the end it's the same movie, except you're wearing stupid glasses to watch it.

Besides, Avatar is one of the more well-known 3D movies, and I won't touch anything that came within 5 meters of James Cameron's political statem- I mean, propa-

... you know what I mean.

Yup, because "killing the planet and destroying indigenous cultures to secure mining rights" is just a terrible message. Commie pinko liberal leftist propaganda at its worst. There has never been a director so obviously concerned with pushing an agenda as Mr. Cameron, no sir.

Oh, you were talking about the so-called anti-military/Anti-American angle. Can't help you there, everyone knows the US Armed Forces have never done anything immoral or unjust or self-serving.