• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Harlan Ellison COTEF Lawsuit Gains Momentum

The "Angry Young Man" in literary SF has now become the "Embittered Old Man" of SF..


Such is life...
 
I suggest that from this day forward we all simply refer to it as "The Custodian of Forever" and call the woman "Edie Keelhall" and to hell with whiny Harlan.

I'm surprised Ellison hasn't shown up at my house and demanded compensation from me because I WATCHED the episode.

Dude..why did you give him that idea..there's some strange dude knocking at my door right now!!!!

Rob


*EEP!** My bad!
 
David Gerrold has chimed in on the subject. See post #222.

Now it's getting interesting!


The Ellison bashers in this thread should also read post #225.

An excerpt...

David Gerrold: Some of the comments posted about Harlan tell us nothing about Harlan at all, but a great deal about the small horizons of those who have posted them.
 
Funniest part of David Gerrold's second post:

A lot of people are repeating a lot of BS about Harlan Ellison, creating a mental image of him as some kind of cranky belligerent dwarf on a rampage

Priceless!
 
The Guardian, however, is a bit of a problem. Harlan Ellison’s unused drafts included The Guardians of Forever, three ancient beings who controlled time. The finished episode, heavily rewritten by writers other than Ellison, has The Guardian (singular) of Forever, a mysterious, donut shaped time portal.
Except you don't know of what you speak, because by the second draft the Guardians of Forever were the limbo voiced Guardian of Forever singular. All the Trek people did was slap a donut shape around the vortex and make it flash when it talked. It's still Ellison's invention and character.

I still don't understand this venom against the man. It's as if his holding other parties to the terms of their contracted arrangements and/or industry standards is like a personal affront to Star Trek. Star Trek is just a property owned by a faceless corporation that changes hands all the time. Why be in favor of a soulless entity's profit potential over that of a creator and human being?

I just don't get it...
 
Gene Coon and John Meredith Lucas were full-time staff members... Ellison was an freelance writer. I have no experience with these matters, but I think the laws and contracts apply differently.

According to Gerrold's post, DC Fontana stands to benefit heavily if this goes through and she was staff for most of season 1 and all of season 2. So I don' tthink that is going to be the deciding aspect here.
 
^ So he does.

Now I'm really rooting for him. I'd love to see the original creators of the characters (or their estates) get a piece of the pie.
 
Last edited:
I suggest that from this day forward we all simply refer to it as "The Custodian of Forever" and call the woman "Edie Keelhall" and to hell with whiny Harlan.

I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the actual issues involved.

No one is whining, no matter how urgently you may beg to differ.
 
I suggest that from this day forward we all simply refer to it as "The Custodian of Forever" and call the woman "Edie Keelhall" and to hell with whiny Harlan.

I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the actual issues involved.

No one is whining, no matter how urgently you may beg to differ.

Dude got paid initially, right? Is it my fault he wasn't far-seeing enough to protect his potential future interests in the materials he created?

The fact is that he didn't respect the source material enough AT THE TIME to consider it might have value down the line. HIS mistake.

Live and learn.

And, yes, I AM a creative person and a writer and I DO like getting paid for what I do. I also have enough integrity to recognize when I was not responsible enough to look after my OWN interests to not bitch and whine like a little girl. Paramount is notorious for ripping off creative people. In a way, it's part of what they do. Not unlike the cast of Gilligan's Island who got paid for their initial performances and like 6 rebroadcasts and haven't made a dime off the show in forty years. Unfortunate, but those were the deals they made.

There is a long pedigree of people losing or not controlling the rights to their creative endeavors. Siegal and Shuster with Superman. The freaking BEATLES for God's sake. McCartney has to pay royalties to someone ELSE when he plays "Yesterday" in concert.

A shame, yeah. Trying to move the goalpost after the fact though is sad.
 
The fact is that he didn't respect the source material enough AT THE TIME to consider it might have value down the line. HIS mistake.
Back that up. He has a contract and certain rights under it and under Writer's Guild agreements with the studios. How did he not "respect the source material enough AT THE TIME to consider it might have value down the line"? Did you even read the complaint filed?
 
I suggest that from this day forward we all simply refer to it as "The Custodian of Forever" and call the woman "Edie Keelhall" and to hell with whiny Harlan.

I'm surprised Ellison hasn't shown up at my house and demanded compensation from me because I WATCHED the episode.

Dude..why did you give him that idea..there's some strange dude knocking at my door right now!!!!

Rob

Just raise your knockers a few more inches and you'll have nothing to worry about.
 
Kids, unless you happen to have a copy of Ellison's contract and are well versed in contract law, especially entertainment law, you don't know what you're fucking talking about. And since Harlan still has the comic books he bought at the age of twelve, it's a pretty safe bet he has a copy of every contract for every script he ever sold, his agent and lawyer on speed dial, and, as he has done several times in the past, is enforcing his legal rights with his usual calm and charming grace.

I'd like to think any of us would stand up for ourselves with even half the tenacity that Harlan stands up for himself.
 
maybe im wrong here but didnt he lose the rights to coteof when he sold it to paramount all those years ago?maybe instead of suing over something he wrote over forty years ago , he should actually come up with some new stories that will provide him with a revenue stream! what a jerk!;)

NO an author has every right to use that creation. He owns the creative rights to it desptie paramount rejected it.

He does have a right to republish that ya know.

Nathaniel

P.S

is glad someone is taking on paramount... they screw many writers for every series movie or program...
 
So....down with Paramount? Aren't they releasing a new Star Trek movie soon? Do we not want that to happen? Should we boycott the new Star Trek movie? Should we boycott Star Trek as a whole?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top