• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Half-Blood Prince (p)reviews

This one's from mugglenet which I thought was a review that wasn't as bleak as aintitcool.

Onward to the movie.

We knew they had filmed a bridge collapse scene which in the book was mentioned during the first chapter, “The Other Minister.” This makes for a great opening sequence and, although we don’t meet the Muggle Prime Minister, we get to see the disaster happen from the Muggle perspective. Actually it’s from both Muggle and a wizarding perspective that we see what happens – a really cool trick which you can do with film. It’s pulled off quite nicely. Already I like the style and care that is put in to characterizing people in this world who we don’t even meet.

The Dursleys are not in this film, but that information was also already available. Instead, we find Harry waiting for Dumbledore, and I won’t say where except to say that they’ve constructed a scene which I think works well. The movie has already given a couple of seconds to reflect quickly on the horrors of Harry’s previous year, and we are ready as moviegoers to watch Harry pick up the journey and go further from there.

Harry and Dumbledore Side-Along Apparate (the special effect, which appeared to be completed, was perfect in matching the canon description of the act) to the village where Slughorn is staying, and one of my largest concerns for the movie was getting to see Jim Broadbent as Horace Slughorn. Don’t worry. Throughout the movie, I was continuously impressed with how they adapted the character to the film, and to say that he does reflect my Slughorn from the books satisfactorily, with a little extra, is true. The scene where they meet Slughorn is surprisingly close to the events of the book, as is most of this movie, actually. I was surprised and delighted to see Couch-Slughorn put to film.

The events of “Spinner’s End” take place also in the beginning of the film. We’ve received a promo picture of Alan Rickman’s Snape and Helen McCrory’s Narcissa doing the Unbreakable Vow, and that’s why - it’s in the movie. Alan Rickman looks good. They’ve tailored his Snape suit and he’s got nicer hair, the full main villain treatment I suspect. The scene is compellingly acted and doesn’t feel out of place with the many events of the start of the film.

And thus, the movie continues. With the initial story-setting behind them, although it didn’t feel rushed at all, we are taken to the Burrow. Here is where I’ll speed up the review.

A lot of the things people seemed to dislike about the fifth HP film, such as vast amounts of time passing in visually appealing yet otherwise disappointing montages, does not happen in this. The film maintains its director’s neat visuals, however. Right from the initial Burrow scene, it is clear that Mr. Yates has not lost his creative edge and rather moved on to do different and wonderful things with the camera.

The entire movie seems to keep its pace, and I think one of the things that has helped the filmmakers is a clear-cut set of events spread almost evenly throughout the year in the book. There’s not too much stuff going on, rather just enough things at significant enough times of year so that they can document the full year without it feeling rushed. Again I mention the closeness of the movie to the book particularly. Some scenes are almost verbatim, but the ones that aren’t serve to really enhance the movie’s impact and its ability to stand alone as a film.

All of my concerns about Bonnie Wright as Ginny were washed away in her first scene. Book Six has either too much snogging or too much Voldemort – neither of which I complained about and both which I rather enjoyed – but this movie completely balances the two quite nicely. It seems effortless almost. But there are really dark scenes and then there are very fun scenes. If you know the characters from having read the books, I think you’ll get more out of the movie than those who haven’t and that’s surprising to me. For the first time, it seems, the filmmakers have made a movie which is REALLY true to the characters of the book and almost not afraid to leave newcomers with the shorter stick.

Also important to mention is that this movie is in NO way, at all, in any shape or form, a children’s movie. I’ve said that before regarding the Potters, but this time it couldn’t be truer. Everything about this movie screams serious intensity, like the Katie Bell necklace scene, and it makes me so happy that they could make such an intense movie, because it gives me real hope for the adaptations of the seventh book. But I think you should think twice before bringing your kid brother to see it.

Such effort is spent on the characters of the trio throughout the course of the movie. In fact, Emma Watson’s never been better. There’s a moment in this movie where I almost screamed “THAT’s my book Hermione!” which hadn’t happened to me since the first movie. Similarly Rupert has had some REAL fun scenes to play with in this film. The Lavender subplot is hilarious and, surprisingly, not annoying at all. And oh, what a joy it is to see Quidditch back!

The movie focuses on the trio perhaps more than ever, but the surrounding characters are well portrayed. Matthew Lewis as Neville again has a small amount of screen time, but we all know how awesome his role is going to be in the next movie. Even in scenes where the characters we all know by now aren’t featured or speaking, their characters show through. That’s no doubt due to improved acting all around, and a seriously commendable tolerance for their bit parts. They do the characters well. Evanna Lynch’s Luna gets perhaps equal screen time as she did in the last movie, and many things from her character in the books are brought to screen and fun to see.

Also commendable is the new casting. Cormac McClaggen’s character and Lavender Brown’s really help to push the school side of the plot throughout the film. The movie almost relies on their convincing roles at times because it’s easier to forget that we’re in school with how dark and mysterious everything else is that’s going on.

There are many scenes with Draco. I’m surprised I haven’t mentioned him yet. From early on, Tom Felton has a lot to work with in this movie and it’s very pleasant to see him get to play his character for a good amount of time. The movie is sympathetic – the story focuses on his plight as a subplot, and we’ll often see him lurking around the castle in the backgrounds of other scenes. We’re being “reminded” that he’s got his mission, without being told everything.

Michael Gambon, in this movie, has finally satisfied me. He has the right inflection of the lines which is necessary for Dumbledore, and altogether seems to be really with it. The climax of the film is very wonderfully done, and throughout the film you are able to embrace his Dumbledore quite nicely.

Another great thing about this film is the reappearance of the little things. Tom Riddle’s diary, from Chamber of Secrets, and The Marauder’s Map, for instance. It’s the little things that add continuity from previous films which I’m a stickler for. Also, the twins! While I realize they’re not props, by far my FAVORITE scene in the movie is the one that takes place at Weasley’s Whizarding Wheezes! It’s so good to see them after the initial subdued opening of the film and their scene, while about five minutes long, is the best. The filmmakers simply couldn’t leave it out – and it does well to show that some people in the wizarding world are able to break through all the fear going on out there. Diagon Alley is otherwise almost completely empty – Ollivander’s shop is empty. Can you believe they mention it? They do. They even have time to walk inside and feel sad.

Next to mention are the Pensieve scenes. It’s been confirmed that there are a lot fewer in the movie than there are in the book. I didn’t have a problem with scenes cut from Movie Five, and I have even less of a problem with them not being included in Six. What the filmmakers have done is meticulously crafted a movie to portray the events that happen in the book and to tell a really compelling story which includes all the most adaptable parts they could to fit the time frame. Would I have liked to have seen The Gaunts? Maybe. But that’s easily a ten to fifteen minute scene which has little to do with the actual path ahead of Harry. There are some things which I’m proud that I can just read them in the book and they’ll always be there, so well done, without a film adaptation.

There are only two Pensieve scenes included. The scene from the teaser trailer, Young Tom Riddle in the orphanage, and the scene in Slughorn’s classroom both shortened and elongated just like in the book where we learn about Horcruxes. These three journeys into the Pensieve are so well-placed in the film and the film doesn’t feel short of them. Nor is there too much snogging. Overall, once more, a great balance between.

The cave scene at the end of the book could have been messed up so badly in the film, but it’s not. It’s amazing. It’s exactly what I imagined and conveys amazing emotional impact. The special features are great. Watching Harry force-feed Dumbledore is just as raw and scary as it was in the book. Dan Radcliffe’s acting all throughout is top-notch.

I forgot to mention the Half-Blood Prince subplot. With so many subplots, it’s a wonder how they all fit into the movie so well, but they do! They weren’t cut! And Slug Club scenes, oh yes, there are a few. And Quidditch, as mentioned. So much is back I am overwhelmed with how much of each that I didn’t think we’d see.

Finally, the climax. It, too, is adapted very well. There is such emotion behind it and, when the score is completed, I’m sure it will be one of the defining moments of the series. I liked watching it much, much better than Sirius’ death scene. There was a funny moment for me at the Burrow with Lupin and Tonks and Mr. Weasley in the room when I thought, “Hey wait a minute, where’s Gary Oldman?” Dumbledore’s death will stick.

The movie score, although we did hear an un-finalized version, was great. They have used some recurring themes, including several from the Prisoner of Azkaban film! I was very in awe to hear the tune to “Something Wicked This Way Comes” set to book six events - so ominous and truly perfect. I have full faith that, when completed, it will be wonderful.

After the movie I introduced myself to David Heyman. Not only was he there, but so was Alan Horn, president of Warner Bros. And David Yates, the director, David Barnes the co-producer, and Mark Day the film editor! They all sat for a twenty minute “focus group” afterwards which I did not attend, and when they came out I spoke with them at length about the film and how I felt it was a big success.

I wrote this review so that I could express to everyone how worth the wait this movie is going to be. I know it’s been delayed and I know that stinks. But they’re going to use the time they now have, screen it some more, and a better movie will be made as a result of it, I am completely convinced. I can’t wait to see proper movie trailers, a movie poster, and all of that because my worries are completely gone. I am sure that the movie I saw is not the final film and once the CGI is completed and feedback considered, there will be plenty more to make it a completely different experience.

Seeing it is still a bit of a blur, but hopefully this helps the wait, and to assure you that the people who are making the movie have the fans’ concerns at heart. We all took surveys which begged us to be as specific as possible about what we did and didn’t like, who our favourite characters were, questions about the pace of the film and all of that. This movie is going to be the best one yet. They have the time and the will-power to make it so.
 
Yeah, I'm not happy with the changes. Some of the stuff they cut out is just infuriating as a Harry Potter fan.
 
Harry/Hermione shipper? ;) j/k

No, not at all. I think Harry and Hermione made much more sense, but I didn't have that much of a problem with Ron and Hermione despite how forced it felt to me (much like Harry and Ginny, which came out of no where).

That part didn't ultimately change my view of the book either way. I was never very interested in the romantic relationships in the series, they were never well done as far as I can recall.


I had no problem with the epilogue because it in essence allow Jo Rowling to clearly state what the character's futures are and that they are happy in general. I just hear that epilogue hatred mostly from those shippers who seem to be really bitter about what the final couples were.

I hate the epilogue because it was terribly written, on par with 15 year old fangirl fanfiction... Only just potentially better edited. I'm surprised my eyes didn't fall out of my head from rolling them so hard during those last few pages.

Frankly, the only people I've found that like the epilogue are Harry Potter apologists.
 
After the initial high of reading a new Harry novel, HBP dropped in esteem in my mind. Nothing really happens in it; it's Voldy flashbacks and teenagers making out the whole time. And the ending is so abrupt and anti-climactic!

Deadly Hallows, on the other hand, is the best of the series and absolutely amazing :D

I think we're both in agreement. Deathly Hallows was indeed amazing and the best of the series.

HBP is my least favorite of the series. Voldemort's backstory doesn't yield any real surprises (he was always evil!) and there's so little action that takes place. That's actually why I don't mind them creating the Burrow scene in this film. The movie needs something to happen before the end. One of the few decent changes (on paper) done by the Hack.

Deathly Hallows is absolutely dull and boring. It is terrible IMO. There is -- so much disconnection, so much junk thrown in it, it seems like she tried to wrap it all up in a hurry, like she just realized she had to end it and quickly. There is very little resolution to the book at all and there are some major plot points that she left out.

HBP, while the shipper stuff is...distracting, I absolutely LOVE Voldemort's back story. Yes, he is always been evil but looking at it, there is a parallel between his back story and Potter's back story. There is much more there than, oh he was always evil. WHY though? And how? I loved how she did this.

To me, there is a lot of subtle action in HPB. True, it doesn't translate well to the screen but rarely do books translate well to screen.
 
A lot o you guys seem to have issues with the movies but I quite like them all so far, sure they are different from the books but also very close in many ways, and it’s nice to see some of the stuff that leaps of the page. I always smile when I see the moving staircases in the films and the paintings… they are filled with little subtle objects that expand and enhance the books. I have to agree that the end of this sounds bad if they have changed as much as has been said. I also think it is foolish to make the last book into 2 films, this should have been done with the OotP which is by far the longest of the books. They cut FAR to much out of that film. I will do as I always do and see this as soon as it’s out. I can live with the changes because any HP film is better than no HP film at this point. [FONT=&quot][/FONT]
 
Rowling has often spoken about that in Harry Potter, it's the choices we make that define us, determine if we're good and evill. But she seemed to do the opposite with Voldemort's backstory. He always was evil. Voldemort has insane and inbred family, that was used to explain some of his insanity. He's rotten to the core from day one. He doesn't choose to be evil...he just is from day one. At 11, he's already taking pleasure at making other children suffer. Really, how Dumbledore allowed him to come to go to Diagon Alley unsupervised and beyond that, go to Hogwarts is beyond me. Young Tom Riddle already displayed many of the signs of a serial killer before he even learned about magic. He can't even look at something he wants without getting an evil glint in his eye.

No, not at all. I think Harry and Hermione made much more sense, but I didn't have that much of a problem with Ron and Hermione despite how forced it felt to me (much like Harry and Ginny, which came out of no where).

I liked Harry/Hermione in the beginning and still think they'd have made a good couple. But I was definitely won over by Ron/Hermione, which built up greatly the seventh book. I just wish we could have seen the early days of them as a couple. THAT would have been fun to read.

Harry and Ginny...this is something I feel Rowling built up poorly. She builds up Harry's angst nicely in HBP about the subject and the scene where Harry finally takes the iniative and kisses her is great (although I read they totally re-worked the scene for the HBP movie and made it crappy). But after they become a couple, Rowling thought it would have be better to talk about Harry and Ginny's relationship instead of showing it. When it comes to Harry, he has a suffering fetish and I guess it would have caused her physical pain to have Harry being happy for more than two consecutive pages.

But those changes, particularly to the end, make me sick. I don't mind the Burrow scene since there isn't a lot of action in HBP and I don't mind the teen angst since it was fun in the books (although basing the entire film around it is stupid) but gutting the final scenes are completely stupid. The Harry/Snape scene should be an intense, emotionally-charged scene with a talented actor like Alan Rickman being given a chance to shine. But instead, it's like the way the movie was adapted and the way that Dumbledore has been portrayed in these films. As generic and lazy. The Harry/Snape confrontation and Dumbledore's death will be anti-climatic because the Hack and the filmmakers were too lazy to invest time in the story and the characters.
 
Rowling has often spoken about that in Harry Potter, it's the choices we make that define us, determine if we're good and evill. But she seemed to do the opposite with Voldemort's backstory. He always was evil. Voldemort has insane and inbred family, that was used to explain some of his insanity.

I think Dumbledore made a strong statement in this. It is the choice his mother made that ultimately corrupted and made Riddle evil. It is also shown that Riddle made the decisions to kill and use his magic for evil. He wasn't ALWAYS evil because we don't know what he was like as a baby. He was abandoned by his mother (a choice) and when his magical abilities manifested, he used it to terrorize and harm other people (another choice). She parallels Potter with Riddle well.

He's rotten to the core from day one. He doesn't choose to be evil...he just is from day one. At 11, he's already taking pleasure at making other children suffer. Really, how Dumbledore allowed him to come to go to Diagon Alley unsupervised and beyond that, go to Hogwarts is beyond me. Young Tom Riddle already displayed many of the signs of a serial killer before he even learned about magic. He can't even look at something he wants without getting an evil glint in his eye.

Actually we don't know if he was evil from day one because she doesn't give us enough of the backstory to understand really a lot about Riddle. We do know that it was his choice to hate his mother's decision and blame his father. He didn't believe his mother was a witch either. He didn't get the entire story of his upbringing.

Dumbledore had no say if Riddle could or couldn't go to Hogwarts. He was disturbed as he said and kept a very close eye on Riddle but he wasn't the Headmaster and didn't have the decision to keep kids from going. He also thought that maybe, maybe Riddle could be redeemed at Hogwarts but unfortunately not. I do agree that I don't know why he let Riddle go to Diagon Alley alone, that made no sense but no matter.

We know this later, the evil glint. He becomes obsessed with power and with influence. You can blame Slughorn as much as Dumbledore for that.

Harry and Ginny...this is something I feel Rowling built up poorly. .

I don't think it is built up slowly. Ginny always had a crush on Harry (re-read the books) and she talks to Harry about this. I think she did a fairly well job on it.
 
Built up poorly was a poor choice of words on my part. I just thing Rowling could have done more with the relationship. From Harry's perspective in HBP, it's built up well and the kiss is a great part in the book. But afterwards, that's about it for the relationship except for one scene in TDH. That's what I didn't care for, that she couldn't show Harry in a happy relationship for more than two straight pages.
 
Built up poorly was a poor choice of words on my part. I just thing Rowling could have done more with the relationship. From Harry's perspective in HBP, it's built up well and the kiss is a great part in the book. But afterwards, that's about it for the relationship except for one scene in TDH. That's what I didn't care for, that she couldn't show Harry in a happy relationship for more than two straight pages.

I don't know, considering how much stress Harry is always under what with being marked for death by an evil dark wizard and all I just don't see Rowling dwelling on pages and pages of lovey dovey stuff. That's what fanfic's for. Plus then we would get the bitching about Rowling focusing too much on the B storyline instead of the A storyline.
 
I'm not a shipper mind you. But it would have been nice once in a while to see Harry happy. I'm sorry but she's got a suffering fetish when it comes to Harry.

I have to admit though, I've always been annoyed with people complaining about the way Harry acts from Order of the Phoenix on. If any of those people went through what Harry has had to gone through, I doubt many of them would go around in the best of moods. I thought Harry took his anger out a little too much on Ron and Hermione but the reason he's in such a state is very understandable. That's where I think the problem with the whole Ginny relationship comes on. We often see Harry suffering and see little of the rewards when something actually does go right for him.

That's another reason I like the epilogue. He's happy and living a normal life.
 
He was whiny in the entire OOTP book. WHINY. If he wasn't, I wouldn't have been that ticked off. Plus he acted like a moron through half the book.
 
He was whiny in the entire OOTP book. WHINY. If he wasn't, I wouldn't have been that ticked off. Plus he acted like a moron through half the book.

He was being 'part of' Voldermort through their connection, thus Dumbledore staying away from him, and Snape trying to teaching him blocking techniques. I get why he was angry, and angst filled in OOTP...plus he was 15! I dunno how many 15 year olds you know (I teach them!) but they are whiny, with no where near Harry's excuse.
 
He was whiny in the entire OOTP book. WHINY. If he wasn't, I wouldn't have been that ticked off. Plus he acted like a moron through half the book.

He was being 'part of' Voldermort through their connection, thus Dumbledore staying away from him, and Snape trying to teaching him blocking techniques. I get why he was angry, and angst filled in OOTP...plus he was 15! I dunno how many 15 year olds you know (I teach them!) but they are whiny, with no where near Harry's excuse.

Damn straight! I think many people judge Harry too harshly and the rest of the trio as well, when in fact they are teenagers and teenagers not only going through the typical difficulties of adolescence but also through this war and all the dangers that come with it.

I think the trio are actually quite good people and well adjusted considering all the things they went through, specially Harry who had a pretty crappy first eleven years of his life. That's enough to make any normal person a complete sociopath.
 
He was whiny in the entire OOTP book. WHINY. If he wasn't, I wouldn't have been that ticked off. Plus he acted like a moron through half the book.

He was being 'part of' Voldermort through their connection, thus Dumbledore staying away from him, and Snape trying to teaching him blocking techniques. I get why he was angry, and angst filled in OOTP...plus he was 15! I dunno how many 15 year olds you know (I teach them!) but they are whiny, with no where near Harry's excuse.

First off: I don't like that Harry totally ignored the mirror that Sirius gave him. Was he that dumb not to use it ever?

Secondly: the book was way, way too long.

Third: No resolution on Diggory. I mean all they did was a toast. Shouldn't there been more to that?

Fourth: Kretcher. Awful. Especially his resolution in the Deathly Hallows.

Fifth: Snape not continuing to teach Harry. Wouldn't Dumbledore be a bit concerned about that?

Six: As much as I liked Hermoine getting Prefect for Girls, I wish that they would have included someone else for Prefect for the guys like Neville. Not only would it boost his confidence but he did stand up against the trio in the first book. I like Ron but I don't see him as prefect. It makes the story so narrow minded that we forget there are other characters in the book. Plus the Prefect thing didn't come up a lot in the story and would have strengthened Neville.

Seventh: Again in totalness, what the hell happened to Percy's girlfriend Penelope???

Eighth: Grawp...Um, okay? Why was he needed?

I think after the 4th book, everything starts...unraveling. I liked the 6th book a lot because of the history but there were a few flaws in the book, major flaws as well.
 
1- Harry being such and emotional person he sometimes acts without thinking. This was one of those times.

2- Yep, but GOF was longer to me.

3- What more do you want a statue? Everyone crying their hearts out the rest of the year?

4- Kreacher was ok I mean him and Dobby are really interesting portrayals of what house elves have been and could become. And Kreacher served the trio well to figure out the mystery of the locket.

5- Dumbledore's plan to keep himself away from Harry to protect him from big V failed big time. This was one of those reasons, he knew how Harry and Snape couldn't work together in any way without it becoming heated.

6- Neville, poor kid wasn't the type I fear. A great kid but still at that point not the sort McGonnagal would give a position of power like that. Anyway good ol' Nev got all the confidence boosting he needed by becoming the brave hero in the trio's absence from Hogwarts in Deathly Hallows. Just 'cause we didn't see it doesn't make it any less real.

7- Guys have lots of girlfriends in their live sometimes. Penny's the past I guess and Rowling didn't need her as a character anymore so she wasn't there. Maybe she moved to America or is living in a magical hippy commune in South America. Who knows? Who really cares?

8- Hagrid has a bro! He has no other family and I thought it was endearing that he took him with him. And Grawp did help out during the final Battle of Hogwarts in DH.
 
It sounds like that hack Steve Kloves butchered another adaptation. Wait till you read what he cut out and altered in the film. That man should be barred from writing and have to find a new profession.

Gambon is an atrocious Dumbledore. He never read the books. Neither did Richard Harris but at least Harris actually had a pretty good idea what DD's character was like. Harris captured Dumbledore's eccentric humor while Gambon's DD is completely humorless, yells at his students, and pratically attacks Harry in the GOF adaptation.

I don't even know if I'm going to enjoy this adaptation and I dread how barely The Hack will butcher The Deathly Hallows.

You cant butcher what was crap to begin with, both the Half Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows are terrible pieces of work.

So say we all...I mean...amen!:)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top