As soon as penguin surfaces, no that is not a pun, Jim is going to get Harvey's gun pressed up against the back of his head, and we are going to be witnesses to a very interesting conversation.
It would have been much more interesting if we saw Bullock at least struggling a bit with the orders he had to carry out.
We did. He said outright that his heart wouldn't be in it if he had to try to kill Gordon, and just warning him at all shows that he was conflicted.
It was pretty good, some of it felt odd (like the face-pointed GoPro shots during Gordon's pursuit of the presumed shooter) worth watching again next week to see where it goes.
There's a reason Ivy's name isn't Pamela Isley, and I'll let Bruno Heller deliver it:
"It’s really about being able to tell the secret histories of these stories. If you just re-tell stories exactly as they’ve been told before, whilst you’re being true to the created mythology, you’re not really adding anything to it. So you have to find ways of finding more. And in this case, we’ve set up a situation in which Ivy Pepper, her mom is sick, her dad is dead… She’s going to go to the orphanage. And she’s a nice young girl; relatively undamaged. And she will find people to adopt her. And then we will start on the Poison Ivy story that people are familiar with."
Source
It's a comic book universe derived hybrid world. I'm sure corruption can be at high levels of the FBI in such a world.
So why isn't her name Pamela Isley?
Penguins eat fish.The whole setup with Penguin and Fish (is there some connection with the names there?)
He's already getting his start in the way that you suggested.I think it would have worked better if the Penguin started out as a disfigured kid that's just getting started out with Fish Mooney, working his way though the lower ranks and learning the ropes.
Hopefully the actor will age into someone we can believe as Batman. Eddie Furlong anyone?I really don't know how they're going to sustain these characters' development for so long without Batman making an appearance when Bruce is like, 16/17...
So do cats. I have a feeling it'll be more interesting than that.Penguins eat fish.The whole setup with Penguin and Fish (is there some connection with the names there?)
She won't be around when Batman arrives on the scene. That's why we've never heard of her before.
I was impressed by David Mazouz as Bruce. He conveys a lot of intelligence and intensity. The character is just what I would've expected the young Bruce to be -- a disciplined mind and a keen observer.
Sure he doesn't want to kill Gordon, but he still has no problem ordering Gordon to execute someone else. Which doesn't seem a whole lot better in my book.
And sure he tells Gordon his girlfriend's life will be in danger if he doesn't cooperate... but if the cops and their families are really under that huge a threat all the time, you have to wonder why they even bother to stick around Gotham. Or why someone doesn't appeal to the FBI or Attorney General for help rooting out the corruption. Unless the Gotham PD is literally only made up of criminals, which seems unlikely.
As a Batman show, it misses the target.. though it does so deliberately. It's a prequel that doesn't even focus on it's target (Batman) but instead the host of characters.
My biggest problem with Gotham is that villains seem way too far in their character evolutions for a prequel set ten or so years before Batman arrives. Selina Kyle is already a slick thief jumping off rooftops, the Penguin is already a murderous psychopath in deep with the mob...
I think it would have worked better if the Penguin started out as a disfigured kid...
that's just getting started out with Fish Mooney, working his way though the lower ranks and learning the ropes.
Hopefully the actor will age into someone we can believe as Batman. Eddie Furlong anyone?
niece? in what continuity is Batgirl not Gordon's biological daughter?![]()
One of the “problems” with Frank Miller’s Batman: Year One is that he really did not care about Batman continuity.
That is not a big problem, of course, but it tends to make things a bit hairy when those at DC who DO care about continuity got involved.
Stuff like having Alfred be the Wayne’s butler from the start, or Catwoman getting a new origin, that really did not cause all that much rattles in the cage.
However, what DID was Miller’s determination that Gordon was a much younger man when Year One began.
As a result, the baby his wife was carrying in the series could not POSSIBLY have been Barbara Gordon, as Miller intended (which, in and of itself, ALSO “violated” continuity as Gordon always had a firstborn son) as it would mean that Babs would have been born when Batman was already in his mid to late 20s, and that would not work well, time-wise.
Therefore, an off-hand reference to Gordon having a boy was turned into it BEING a boy.
And Barbara? She became his young “niece” who he later adopted (and Devin Grayson later wrote an issue that made it so that Gordon had an affair with his sister-in-law so that Barbara WAS his real daughter).
I'm thinking they're going for an Animated Series take on Bullock. Someone Gordon can trust, but a far cry from an honest cop.
The effect given in the series is that of an honest, if not exactly by the book, cop who "looks" like the stereotypical corrupt officer.
Actually the target is supposed to be the people around Batman, following the precedent of Gotham Central and similar comics focusing on the GCPD. But I suppose they're under pressure to focus on the Batman-origin elements in the belief that that's what the public will be more interested in. So if anything, they're missing the target of being a solid GCPD show by trying too hard to be a proto-Batman show.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.